Tag: November elections

Keep Digging Deeper

Kamala Harris to Campaign with Liz Cheney in Birthplace of GOP [More]

I may start calling them URH: Unpopular Republicans for Harris

And naturally, the execrable Michael Steele is part of this cabal of Vichycon clowns who crammed so many RINOs into the Big Tent there was no room left for elephants.

If they prevail, there will never be a credible reason for voting Republican, making it fair to conclude that’s been the plan.

Private Parts

Throughout the document, Smith argues that the actions Trump took to overturn the election were in his private capacity – as a candidate – rather than in his official capacity, as a president. [More]

Speaking of acting in a private capacity, how is that not what election interference apparatchik Smith is doing, and why can’t (haven’t) Republicans and SCOTUS put an immediate halt to it?

According to His Nature

The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms says California Gov. Gavin Newsom is a hypocrite for signing a law barring local governments from requiring voter identification, while still expecting gun buyers to provide ID before exercising their Second Amendment rights. [More]

Same question I asked here…

So… does this mean they’re reconsidering…?

VOTE

While it seems unlikely that anyone who reading this would miss a vote, the reality is many gun owners do not register to vote or return their ballots. [More]

I kind of understand a fatalistic TINVOWOOT impulse. But I don’t get profiles in apathy. Or rejecting a self-defense tactic. I will keep trying with the tools at hand.

And I haven’t seen anyone who does plan on staying above us all flesh out a feasible plan for during whatever war may result and afterward, when rule by somebody is reestablished.

The other thing I haven’t seen from those who refuse to participate is a credible history of personal involvement working the system they reject.

My analogy is climbing out of a well. I’d rather start closer to the top than at the bottom, which is where a Kamala win will lead us. And my question for those who say “Bring it” is, what are you waiting for? When things get worse, the time will not be more opportune.

Meanwhile, Over at the Harris for President Campaign

“The Committee seeks to determine whether the Biden-Harris Administration attempted to use a foreign leader to benefit Vice President Harris’ presidential campaign and, if so, necessarily committed an abuse of power,” Comer wrote. [More]

Of course it did. On both counts. And promises were made in exchange for the endorsement.

You gonna do something', or just stand there and bleed?

The Goldman Standard

Rep. Dan S. Goldman (D-NY), a former aide to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and heir to the Levi Strauss fortune, said Wednesday that former President Donald Trump intends to “execute a coup” on January 6, 2025, if he loses the race. [More]

I haven’t heard from this nepo piece of crap for a while and now we get him spreading dangerous lies twice in one day?

As an aside, I hope no one here is still buying Levis.

[Via bondmen]

Pre-Election Tone-Down

Harris Silent on Past Promise to Give ‘Dreamers’ Pathway to Citizenship – The campaign also didn’t say if Harris would support “using ‘parole in place” for any other group of undocumented immigrants.”[More]

Of course it’s what she intends. She just doesn’t weant to tell the electorate until after she’s in office.

Just like she’s not going to take guns.

From the Ministry of Bread and Circuses

The NFL claims to have engaged in a “nonpartisan” get-out-the-vote effort for the 2024 election, but a look at its list of partners reveals that it has only teamed up with organizations that promote left-wing candidates and causes. [More]

No longtime reader will be surprised.

What do you call a gun owner who spends hours each week on televised sports/going to games and none on promoting and defending the right to keep and bear arms?

[Via Michael G]

GRNC 2024 Candidate Evaluations

This guide estimates where candidates stand on gun issues by comparing their views with those of a control group of gun owners. As noted below, a “4-STAR” candidate agrees with the control group on at least 90% of gun issues, a 3-STAR agrees on least 80%, a 2-STAR on at least 70%, a 1-STAR on at least 60%, and a 0-STAR candidate agrees on less than 60% of gun issues. [More]

It’s a place to start and will no doubt be “single issue” strong.

I’d like to see the criteria and if “the greatest threat” is considered.

The Culpability Consequence

…26 million Americans believe “the use of force” is justified to keep Trump from regaining the presidency. [More]

They mean “by others,” and like the MSNBC moron, most have no clue that it could blow back on them up close and personal. They think they’ll read about it, make some “serve’s the fasicsts right” comments on social media, and that’ll be the end of it.

[Via bondmen]

Graphic, But Hardly Novel

Professor Sends His ‘What If Jan 6 Succeeded’ Comic-Book To All Pennsylvania High Schools [More]

Does it say how they did that while unarmed?

He’s equating Trump agenda supporters with Nazis and white supremacists, replete with Confederate swastikas.

Now tone down the rhetoric before somebody gets hurt!

[Via bondmen]

Adventures in Baselessness

Nothing to see here! Look away! Yeah, it’s just election officials all across the country sounding the warning alarm about problems with the USPS that could interfere with our elections. But don’t you dare say that the election isn’t the most secure ever! [More]

Yeah, except the Post Office is saying it “disenfranchises,” setting the stage for Democrats to say the election was stolen..

[Via Michael G]

There’s an App for That

“Voting requires taking time off work or finding childcare, identifying your polling place, finding time to go there, waiting in line, dealing with confused/hostile people working at the polling place, and then driving or walking back to wherever you started. Not surprisingly, few people bother. The solution is simple: If we want more people to vote, we have to make it easier to do so. If voting requires just opening an app, a lot more people will do it.” [More]

Aw, gee, duty requires effort and rights require responsibility.

Democrats really are the party of the lazy and the entitled.

No Debate?

The Debate Was So Biased It Was Divorced From Reality. Trump Should Refuse To Do Another [More]

And what hay could be made from that?

His people couldn’t have foreseen who they were dealing with and established better ground rules? That hardly speaks to negotiating skills.

If I were Team Kamala, I would be challenging him to more debates and calling him a chicken if he didn’t accept.

Now that they know her tactics and how she will argue on the topics, countering them should be pre-scripted.

[Via bondmen]

Verified by MonsterInsights