Notes from the Resistance
[W]hat they’re really engaging in is trademark gaslighting on behalf of foreign criminals and invaders. [More]
You’ll never see them advise disobeying orders to disarm their countrymen, will you?
“Orders we will not obey,” eh?
So… when is ADL going to label them “Anti-Government Extremists Recruiting Military and Police”…
And when are the Democrats going to condemn enforcing citizen disarmament infringements?
Funny thing– instead of the Constitution they’re defending invaders…
A Washington judge issued a TRO that, among other restraints, prohibited this Montana guy from possessing firearms. The TRO was communicated to the town where the Montana guy lives and the local police department enforced the TRO by confiscating all of this Montana guy’s firearms. Done. Because this guy had not been to Washington in three decades and because the accusing girlfriend recanted her story of threat, the judge reviewing the TRO dismissed it. However, this Montana victim still cannot get his firearms returned. [More]
It would help if we had names of all involved. Shame on those Montana “Only Ones.”
Note Seattle cops won’t help ICE enforce immigration law, but Montana cops will enforce Washington diktats. F_n’ jackboots.
This is why Oath Keepers’ “Orders We Will Not Obey” were so important, and why tyrants feared it and smeared it, to where it’s unlikely to be resurrected in any substantive form.
You really had something, Stewart. And you blew it.
[Via Jess]
Five Colorado Law Enforcement officers are facing unpaid leave, demotions, forced counseling, lawsuits, and fines for alerting ICE about an illegal alien – Attorney General Phil Weiser is personally overseeing that they get punished. [More]
They’re just lucky their Number One priority wasn’t their oath too the Constitution.
[Via Michael G]
“The founder of a violent militia group…” [More]
Really? How many tens of thousands of members were there? What was their violent crime rate? How many have committed shootings, stabbings, and assaults? What orders were given to members to commit those specific acts?
“The reason Oath Keepers is not a Militia is simple — among other considerations, we do not have a command structure, do not assign Militia rank designations or titles… Oath Keepers loves the name ‘Militia,’ but Oath Keepers is not a Militia. We would, however, love to see every State have its Office of the Militia, for we do honor our Oath to the Constitution which requires the Militia. Why else would the SPLC and DHS hate our guts, eh?”
But to think I’ve hosted such violent homegrown terrorists in my home, with my wife and children… And used the good china!
“Real reporter” Sebastian Murdock relieves us of any incentive to read further. It’s not the first time HuffPo has borne false witness.
But yeah, Stewart Rhodes is correct that Donald Trump’s base is upset over the way the administration is dismissing “Epstein files” questions and that could spell trouble.
Let’s say Harris had won and the next day signed an executive order banning all guns. How many cops do you think would follow their oath? [More]
Oath Keepers had to be destroyed by those in power. And they had to make sure everyone believed that was for our own good.
[Via WiscoDave]
White supremacists. This ain’t me just telling you, you can Google this if you don’t believe me, but it was the Oath Keepers. [More]
I won’t speak for racist collectivists fraudulently portrayed as “right wing,” but can document this with certainty about Oath Keepers:
Section 8.02. Restrictions on Membership… (b) No person who advocates, or has been or is a member, or associated with, any organization, formal or informal, that advocates discrimination, violence, or hatred toward any person based upon their race, nationality, creed, or color, shall be entitled to be a member or associate member.
So if that’s the conclusion Google is leading people to, that’s libelous. That and Crockett is a racist voted for by stupid people.
House Democrat Urges Mike Johnson to Increase Capitol Security Following Oath Keeper Visit [More]
Hey, if throwing out a little libel gets you headlines…
Maybe he’d feel safer in his native Peru…
[Via bondmen]
But Williams wants to let his former comrades know “a faggot is doing this to them.” He thinks his story could be his most effective weapon. [More]
Not to mention a proven liar, out to try and ruin lives for personal motivations that appear to reflect on him more than they do on actionable lawbreaking….
Just like what appears to be more of a smear job than investigative reporting does on Pro Publica.
It does touch on what I considered to be Oath Keepers’ greatest vulnerability: Involving itself in actions that strayed from what the controllers feared the most: its mission to educate enforcers about orders not to obey and why.
I’ll also say that some of the names I’m seeing representing new leadership were never included in the many emails I still have with old leadership.
[Via DDS]
One anonymous defense official was quoted in the report saying, “Troops are compelled by law to disobey unlawful orders.” [More]
And here we’ve been told Oath Keepers were an anti-government insurrectionist militia, with most of the information refuting that scrubbed from all but the Wayback Machine…
Trump’s election has also raised questions inside the Pentagon about what would happen if the president issued an unlawful order, particularly if his political appointees inside the department don’t push back. “Troops are compelled by law to disobey unlawful orders,” said another defense official. [More]
And here I thought a top priority was to purge Oath Keepers…
An Oath Keeper Talks Civil War Over Pastrami on Rye [More]
With a Wired propagandist who clearly holds him in disdain? Why?
California law bars non-residents from carrying a gun. Does that violate the Second Amendment? [More]
No one who is not a prohibitionist would even ask.
Or as Democrat Roger Taney wrote when horrified at the prospect of Dred Scott being considered a citizen:
“It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State … and to keep and carry arms wherever they went.”
Wait… that last link is from Oath Keepers…? What are racist Nazi rightwing insurrectionists doing defending rights for all…?
Elias Alias is writing a sequel and working on a project, and is asking for some support. [More]
I talked about Targeted Red here.
And as noted before, I never ask readers to do anything I’m not willing to do myself. My stamped envelope is ready for mailing.
If it all goes wrong, with whom will the police side?… As with our military, cops tend to be conservative. Duty, honor and integrity are part of their everyday lives, as are grooming standards. If a cop loses his reputation for integrity, his career is over. [More]
There will be a few, but for every one of these, there are superiors, colleagues, and underlings who kept their mouths shut.
[Via bondmen]
Watkins… testified that she … never heard any commands for her and other Oath Keepers to enter the building on Jan. 6, 2021… Rhodes … told jurors that there was never a plan to attack the Capitol. He testified that he was surprised and upset when he learned that some group members had joined a pro-Trump mob in storming the building… [More]
