Notes from the Resistance
DOJ, despite publicizing its championing of rights restoration, officially disagrees. [More]
“What do we have to do to be considered?” seems a simple enough question gun owners who put this administration in office deserve an answer to.
Jelly Roll says lifelong gun ban as a felon should have ‘path to redemption,’ wants his right to hunt back [More]
My first question was “Why has anyone heard of this person and why does he get major headlines?” and my second question was “Hunting?“
My third question is “How does he vote?” and I guess he can’t and he won’t take a political stance.
Hey, as long as he can be trusted without a custodian we ought to be cool with him being armed, but if the feds green-light rights restoration, I think the rest of us deserve to know the criteria they expect us to meet.
Why does our “pro-gun Justice Department” fight us on that?
[Via Jess]
Manny Abarca served protection order before being reported missing with son [More]
So… the gun-grabber can’t have a gun…?
[Via Steve T]
Major 2A win in Ohio involving an individual indicted for possessing a firearm while under indictment for crime of which he was never convicted. [Watch]
If I’m reading this right, (Republican) prosecutor Melissa Powers evidently believes Ohioans elected a Republican majority so that she could deny the Second Amendment to a man whose robbery indictment was dismissed.
That’ll be useful to know if she ever seeks higher office.
[Via Jess]
A Pennsylvania man convicted of food stamp fraud cannot be barred under federal law from possessing a gun, a U.S. appeals court held for a second time, declining to change its conclusion in light of a major U.S. Supreme Court ruling that clarified the standard for when a firearms regulation can pass constitutional muster. [More]
I’m thinking over how I’d feel about a lifetime ban for those who imposed one on Bryan Range… or better, add “political power” to the law…
[Via Jess]
A North Carolina man whose alias is “AK Guru” has been charged with making and selling hundreds of machine guns built from existing and deconstructed weapons, federal authorities said. [More]
Who’s the snitch?
Instead of taking on the next frontier of firearms regulations, the justices tossed a highly anticipated review of prohibitions on gun ownership for felons. [More]
The distancing from Bruen continues.
As noted before, the only thing the Supreme Court has to do to let infringements stand is… nothing.
[Via Antigone]
North Andover man charged with illegal possession of guns, explosives… Medina is not allowed to possess firearms… [More]
There’s a truism to be admitted here.
[Via Edmund M]
Hennings pleaded guilty in March 2024 to two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm. A U.S. District Court judge sentenced Hennings to 100 months in federal prison. [More]
Since he’s already demonstrated that “gun laws” don’t stop him from getting one, the only rational explanation is he’ll be trustable by then.
[Via bondmen]
Garvey was convicted of two felony sex crimes in 2021 for first-degree rape and second-degree sodomy. [More]
So, the “prohibited person” shouldn’t have been out free to violate “gun laws”…
Funny, how many will miss that and go right along with more infringements against you and me…
Why more American expats are renouncing their US citizenship [More]
I’d ask if they’ve considered all the super implications, but scrooem, I’m with Sam.
The New York State Senate passed legislative measures to advance responsible and effective firearm regulation. The proposed legislation will provide funding for anti-violence education in schools, add reasonable restrictions to the open carry of long guns, establish a ten-day waiting period for firearm purchases, establish a voluntary waiver of the right to purchase firearms, hold firearm industry members accountable for unreasonable conduct, and expand the list of who can petition for Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs). [More]
Here’s to the day when such public bragging of deprivation of rights under color of law is seen as a confession of guilt not protected by the Speech and Debate clause…
[Via Jess]
