How About ‘No, Your Move’?

Do You Have to Serialized Your Unserialized Firearm in Washington State? [Watch]

He says “Yes.” I say it’s a choice, albeit one with risks that can be mitigated with prudent behaviors.

I get tired of this guy’s defeatist titles. I know as an officer of the court he can’t be out there preaching another great American tradition, but he doesn’t have to go full-on “Resistance is futile – You will be assimilated” Borg.

We all get they say we have to and will punish us if they catch us and have the upper hand.

Ultimately, there’s always another answer to “”Throw down your arms, ye villains, ye Rebels, Disperse!” and that prospect terrifies those making the demand, who understand their would-be victims aren’t the only ones with personal risks. That explains why government predators pick isolated easy targets and haven’t done confiscations on a mass scale, and that means, battered and vilified as it may be, the Second Amendment is still working.

[Via Jess]

Hold Onto Your Hat

A Washington State University (WSU) student says he was assaulted outside a popular campus bar in February by an instructor and another university employee for wearing a hat supporting President Donald Trump. [More]

Misdemeanor assualt charges are hardly adequate. Since fists can and do kill, their victim would have been justified “buying them each a round.”

Let’s hope this follows cowardly lying communists Patrick Mahoney and Gerald Hoff around for a good long time, and that they both run into men who want to see what they’re capable of one-on-one.

[Via Jess]

It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Infringed’ Is

HB 1163 – 2025-26 Enhancing requirements relating to the purchase, transfer, and possession of firearms… Third reading, passed; yeas, 29; nays, 19; absent, 0; excused, 1. [More]

It’ll be signed. Then it’s on gun owners paying to have their rights infringed to come up with more money to fight it in courts for years.

Unless...

[Via Jess]

Back the Blue (Helmets)

A Washington state sheriff has taken a firm stand against a proposed bill that would permit noncitizens to become law enforcement officers, granting them the ability to take away the constitutional rights of US citizens. [More]

Not the first

And like they say in the ShamWow commercials: But wait! There’s more!

And the reason Washington leftists now want to have everyone forget what they said before and fund the police?

How else are you going to have a police state?

[Via Straight Shootr]

The Fudd’s Lament

‘It’s getting unaffordable to have fun in this state;’ Washington senate passes bill to raise hunting, fishing licenses [More]

I guess I need to lighten up– it’s just that if that’s the biggest complaint a Washington gun owner has about changes to their laws, I’m wondering what their level of involvement with the real purpose behind the Second Amendment is, and what that means for the rest of us.

It takes me back to another “hobbyist” with “toys” who threw Second Amendment activists under the bus to try to distance himself from them and suck up to a notorious LA Times enemy propagandist. And, of course, it wasn’t long before his “toys” were banned.

I get that paying more for a hunting and fishing license is no “fun.” I’d be curious to know how many who will have donated a significant fraction of what they spend on sporting purposes to groups/lawsuits fighting infringements, and how many are morons who vote for Democrats.

[Via George K]

For the Children

SB 5098, if signed into law, will prohibit the presence of weapons in locations where children are likely to be present… [More]

Well, sure. You don’t want them protected because dead kids really add to the blood dance potential.

The minds manipulating the useful idiots are evil.

What must it take to be a Democrat? And what kind of parent who knows better would comply?

[Via Jess]

The Whole Point of Newspeak

Naming a law that unconstitutionally displaces American workers with foreign invaders the “Keep Washington Working Act” is comparable to calling a Green New Deal spending blowout the “Inflation Reduction Act” and a desecration of holy matrimony the “Respect for Marriage Act.” [More]

And they want you disarmed to “protect public safety.”

“The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect.”

[Via Michael G]

They Tyrannize Because They Can

Washington House Dems Pass Permit-to-Purchase Bill; Defies 2A, Say Critics [More]

That means the Marxists in charge can say “No,” and expand denial criteria with majority votes. This is naked, in-your-face tyranny.

As Constitutional scholar Edwin Vieira Jr. noted in Kolbe v. Hogan:

“This reliance on a permanent private market for firearms guaranteed that most militiamen, through their own efforts, could always obtain firearms suitable for both collective and individual self-defense, and forestalled tyranny by precluding rogue public officials from monopolizing the production, distribution, and possession of firearms.”

That’s why it’s a mistake to rely exclusively on “self defense” in legal arguments and avoid making a case for the Constitutiopnal Militia.

WA Gun Insurance Bill Shows No Depths Are TOO LOW for Gun Hating Democrats

This is all obviously unconstitutional and will never stand up to the text, history, and tradition standards of Bruen… [More]

They’ll keep harassing until they’re made to stop.

Commie Sense Gun Laws

Rep. Kristine Reeves, D-Federal Way, proposed House Bill 1504… individuals would have to obtain a firearm liability insurance policy or bond before purchasing or possessing the weapon…the liability policy or bond must cover at least $25,000 of coverage per incident [and] would also require firearm range operators to obtain general liability insurance with at least $1 million of coverage per incident. If an individual owns more than 25 firearms, they would qualify as a self-insurer by obtaining a certificate from the state…“establishing that the person named therein has deposited with the department $25,000.” [More]

This will not survive Bruen. What I’m wondering is, will Bondi ever direct Justice to defend the law, and if not why not?

And no. Stop with the chronic defeatism.

[Via Jess]

Speaking of Conspiracy to Deprive Rights…

Let’s ask ourselves: Why would @wastatepatrol want to give legislators a tour of things? Why, it’s because I caught them colluding with legislators to take your Constitutionally protected gun rights. [More]

Interesting thread that shows how gungrabbers operate…

If we could ever get Pam Bondi interested in defending ALL rights…

[Via Tacticool Memes]

So It’s Not About Principle

HB 1386 creates an additional 11% excise tax on the sale of all ammunition in the state. Firearms and ammunition are already subject to an 11% federal excise tax through the Pittman-Robertson Act, along with a variety of other state and local taxes and fees. The NRA has current litigation against California’s similar 11% excise tax, and will be present at the hearing to oppose this bill. [More]

So 11% taxes are praiseworthy when they benefit Fudds but bad when they benefit gun-grabbers…?

[Via Jess]

Speaking of Missing the Barn…

AN ACT Relating to protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers [More]

Go after the people whose livlihoods already depend on proving — on demand — that they comply with the law… really?

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights