Beasts of Burden

“The State bears the burden of proving that its immoral scheme to criminalize rights is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition, and they will fail.” [More]

Actually, unless and until the Supreme Court rules in favor of the uninfringed right of the people to keep and bear arms, the burden will continue to be entirely borne by the state’s victims.

We’re the Only Ones Taking Back Enough

A former South Carolina sheriff pleaded guilty Thursday to federal charges that he helped steal about $80,000 from his force’s benevolence fund and took pain medication that was supposed to be destroyed as part of a pill take-back program. [More]

So, like with gun “buybacks,” the pills were the sheriff’s department in the first place?

Interesting character, Sheriff Wright:

Sheriff Missing Amid Federal Probe, Armed With Fully Automatic Weapons And SWAT Gear

The benefits of being an “Only One”…

Except he’s not any more.

And so much for “a few bad apples”:

Wright is at least the 12th sheriff in South Carolina to be convicted or to plead guilty to on-duty crimes in the past 15 years, for misconduct including extorting drug dealers, having inmates work at their homes, and hiring a woman and pressuring her to have sex.

Those are the ones who have been caught…

[Via Jess]

The Assault Foot and Shopping Cart of War Loophole

Kristin Hartman, 54, is facing charges of disorderly conduct, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (shod foot), vandalism, assault and battery, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon (shopping cart), driving under the influence of liquor, resisting arrest, and two counts of assault and battery on a police officer. [More]

Some people just can’t be trusted with anything.

[Via Edmund M]

Shall Not Be Infringed UNLESS…?

Viramontes’s criticism of Bevis on this point carries little weight, given Heller’s holding that “the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes[.]” Id. at 625. Heller did not hold, as Viramontes seems to imply, that military-style weapons are protected “arms” because military action by civilians is lawful. Instead, Heller characterized self-defense as the “core lawful purpose” of firearm use. 554 U.S. at 630. [More]

I beg to differ. And have warned that ignoring the militia aspect would be used against us.

Funny, how a common prohibitionist argument is that 2A advocates ignore the first 13 words, and here it is they’re doing just that in their legal argument.

In any case, the amendment says “arms.” And as for the contention that its ban “finds support in this nation’s history and tradition,” tell that to Tench Coxe.

F-n’ lying Illinois Democrats…

[Via Jess]

Smelling Like a Rosie

“My child chelsea belle – before addiction took over her life – i loved her then i love her now as she faces a scary future- prayers welcomed- #addiction awareness #love #family,” O’Donnell wrote on Instagram, alongside a photo of Chelsea as a child. [More]

Ah, the old Trayvon Martin redirection

And it’s “addiction took over her life,” not her chronic and habitual poor choices landed her where she is. Just like it’s the gun’s fault.

Considering the bat$#!+ crazy environment she was raised in, that girl never had a chance. Funny, how someone so intent on controlling our lives has made such a mess of her own and of everyone she has touched.

The Times, They Are A-Changin’

As NRA 2.0 Takes Control, Big Changes and a Shakeup in Operations Ahead [More]

John Petrolino notes some belt-tightening and re-prioritizing.

Here’s what the Association has to say, and clicking on that will open the thread:

Some may say this explains the reluctance to go all in for Winsome Sears, that they just don’t have the resources. I’d argue admitting weakness in the face of circling enemies is questionable survival strategy, and the long term costs of a Spanberger win will far exceed an investment now. Think of it as deflecting an asteroid instead of waiting for it to hit.

And in any case, much of that burden would fall to the NRA Foundation, which is a separate entity and has released its own announcement:

Regardless, there is a question gun owners need to ask themselves and then answer, especially the ones who say NRA will never get another dime from them:

Do you want the NRA to continue?

If the answer is “Yes,” what are you personally willing to do about that?

It would be interesting to see a chart of sorts to determine what gaps there will be if NRA folds, things they do that competitor groups do not.

UPDATE

Email from NRA Foundation:

NRA Foundation Clarifies Independence Amid NRA Restructuring
FAIRFAX, VA – Amid recent news about the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) restructuring announcement, the NRA Foundation today reaffirmed its independence, stability, and continued focus on its charitable mission.

“The NRA Foundation is an independent, nonprofit public charity with its own staff leadership, legal structure, board of trustees, and mission,” said Tom King, President of the NRA Foundation. “While the NRA undergoes its internal restructuring, the Foundation’s work continues uninterrupted. We remain focused on preserving America’s shooting and hunting traditions for future generations.”

The NRA Foundation is not part of the NRA’s organizational or financial structure. Its role is educational, charitable, and safety-focused – not political or advocacy-driven.*

Importantly, the current State Fund and Friends of NRA grant cycle will proceed without interruption. Applications, reviews, and disbursements are continuing on schedule, ensuring that local programs, ranges, and organizations receive the support they rely on each year.

Since its founding in 1990, the NRA Foundation has awarded more than $500 million in grants in support of local shooting ranges, youth programs, law enforcement training, firearm safety education, and conservation efforts nationwide.

“The Foundation remains financially sound, mission-focused, and committed to transparency and accountability in everything we do,” added King. “We deeply appreciate the continued trust and support of our donors, partners, and grant recipients who see firsthand the impact of our charitable work in communities across America.”

* Just to clarify, the Sears plan accounts for what both 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations can lawfully do, so I’m sensing some redirection going on.

Extortionists for Gun Safety

Maryland Dem state senator charged with extortion after feds say she recorded foe in bed with married man [More]

But that doesn’t mean we can’t trust her on citizen disarmament, does it…?

Great people, these Democratic politicians.

And maybe stamina-challenged “Only One of the Month” Finklestein can frame his termination notice to hang next to his plaque.

Yes, Virginia Gun Owners, There Is a Governor’s Race

Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners Foundation Successful in Overturning Virginia’s Universal Background Check Law; Judge Halts Enforcement [More]

So what are the odds that it will be appealed, especially if Spanberger wins?

I mean, it’s not like we can count on NRA-endorsed Jason Miyares should he beat Jay Jones:

AG Miyares continues his Second Amendment betrayal

Here’s the thing– I’ve been pretty vocal about NRA and Winsome Earle-Sears, but how does GOA explain this?

And I’m getting similar results here and here.

I’d think being headquartered in Fairfax, I’d want a more visible information effort from both my 501(c)(3) and (c)(4) entities.

Verified by MonsterInsights