Notes from the Resistance
We are faced with a revolutionary party well known from history that aims to change the nation into something unrecognizable by most Americans—and it feels that it has created the means to do it. [More]
Just in case anyone was wondering why they’re so hot on disarming those of us who don’t want them to.
[Via bondmen]
6 family members, including baby, shot dead at home in targeted ‘massacre’: Sheriff [More]
Notice they don’t identify the victims even though everything about this screams victim and perp cartel affiliations? And when the accompanying video is over, the next one begins with a somber “America: armed and dangerous”?
[Via Jess]
SAF FILES PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MEMORANDUM IN JONES V. BONTA … The case, filed in 2019, challenges California’s prohibition on firearms to young adults in the 18-20-year age group. [More]
Supreme Court’s Alito and Thomas warn new gun control law raises ‘serious’ 2A questions [More]
Wake me when they warn about serious consequences for courts that thumb their noses.
[Via Dan Gifford]
Keir Starmer has said he could support stronger laws against the ownership of shotguns, speaking in the wake of a drive-by shooting outside a church in north London at the weekend. While there is no indication any gun used in Saturday’s incident, in which four women and two children were injured by shotgun pellets, was legally owned, Starmer said there was a wider issue of legally held guns being misused. [More]
No.
And hopefully, no more Americans will die in wars saving you.
Enjoy the caliphate that is taking over while you lot are fixated on Harry and Meghan.
In HB101, which was filed today by Representative Andrea Romero, if you own a semi-automatic rifle you would have to destroy it or surrender it to the state by July 1 of this year or you would be committing a felony. The bill also makes it a felony to own a magazine that holds more than 9 rounds. [More]
At some point, there have to be stiff sanctions for in-your-face defiance of the SCOTUS ruling or they’ll just keep pulling this sh!+.
Where ‘Military-Style’ Weapons Are Banned In The US [More]
Think of them as Constitution-Free Zones.
[Via bondmen]
So the individual rights interpretation of the Second Amendment was invented by the Black Panthers and the best advocate for “commonsense gun safety laws” is the head of a family with a generational violent criminal history? And anyone who thinks the problem might lie elsewhere is a jihadist? [More]
Here’s a question for Paul Auster.
[Via Michael G]
Prohibiting a person from knowingly wearing, carrying, or transporting a firearm onto the real property of another unless the other has given certain permission to the person or the public generally; and prohibiting a person from knowingly wearing, carrying, or transporting a firearm within 100 feet of a place of public accommodation. [More]
So forget a “No Guns” sign on the door. You won’t even be able to drive onto their parking lot and leave your gun locked in your car unless there’s a sign inviting it.
[Via Jess]
Federal public defenders in 9th Circuit challenge pretrial release ban on guns. Public defenders in 5th Circuit argue against ban on felons owning guns. [More]
And:
And now in the 3rd Circuit…
[Via Jess]
THE OREGON LEGISLATURE’S ANNUAL ATTACK ON GUN RIGHTS BEGINS ON TUESDAY JANUARY 17TH [More]
That said, I’ve gotta wonder how many gun owners actually involve themselves in organized efforts to fight back, and what those who won’t think a militia is.
If owning a gun was all it took, we’d have no better pals than these.
That said, even though “I’m the NRA,” until they get their house in order, which won’t happen with Wayne’s death grip, I generally look elsewhere for leadership.
[Via Andy M]
The Hunting and Conservation Nexus of the National Firearms Act [More]
I may explore this in more detail. For now, suffice it to say a coalition of elitist Fudds and racist, anamaladjusted environmentalcases screwed posterity.
Tangentially-Related UPDATE
Why Are Short Barreled Rifles Actually Regulated in the US? [Watch]
Because those who do can.
[Via Michael G]
While I am a believer in our Constitution and our 2nd Amendment, I firmly support the ban on assault-style rifles and I truly hope our federal government follows to ban them nationwide. Since our Constitution and the 2nd Amendment were formed, firearms have become much more sophisticated and much more deadly. Our Founding Fathers were not loading .223 rounds into their muskets. They were not using firearms designed to disintegrate human bodies. As I said following the Highland Park mass shooting, these weapons of war do not belong on our streets. They’re used to kill our police, used to kill innocent people, and used to inflict maximum carnage on their victims. [More]
The hand on the Bible is always a good clue.
Some of the cud-chewers in “Comments” certainly have the government they deserve.
UPDATE:
Never mind that this is illegal under current federal law. But who cares, right? [More]
[Via President Non_Fudd]
[More]
Since the subject here is infringements on the right of the people to keep and bear arms, why not go one better and look back to when you were born?
There are a few things more stupidly obnoxious than aging “liberals” who are smug about their ignorance, but they merit special calling out because they have imposed it on younger generations depending on them for adult leadership. “Thanks” to them, we have the equally ignorant, ubiquitous, and bigoted “OK Boomer” response.
And then there’s this moron:
No, you wouldn’t. Because if you were truly interested, you’d already be on top of it instead of passing off ignorant snark and calculated misrepresentation as informed cleverness.
Which makes you one of these.
Why Illinois’ new assault weapons ban might not hold up in court [More]
True, but it’s not like it costs the subversives anything, and those they’re persecuting will need to spend big bucks to fight it.
