Anti-Gunners Include Suicides in Their ‘Gun Deaths’ Stats to Boost Bogus ‘Gun Violence’ Talking Points [More]
Funny, because if it’s suicide without a gun, they’re all for it.
Self-Checkout Line
Category: citizen disarmament
Am I Blue?
Where homicide rates are highest: Blue cities in red states [More]
Shall we keep drilling down?
Yet to hear lying Democrats tell it, it’s because Republicans are sellouts to the “gun lobby.”
[Via Michael G]
Protection Racket
DHS Slams Hochul Over Secret Pardon of Convicted Killer – “Rather than putting New Yorkers first, you’re protecting a criminal illegal alien KILLER with a rap sheet including convictions for manslaughter and criminal possession of a firearm.” [More]
Anybody else feeling the cognitive dissonance…?
If Only They’d Disarm You and Me
Taste of the Hood
Police searching for multiple shooters who killed 3 and wounded 9 after dispute at a Brooklyn lounge overnight [More]
That’s what happens when you disrespect someone entitled to your fear.
Brooklyn’s Crown Heights … isn’t that Yvette D. Clarke’s district?
If not, let the demands for YOUR guns begin! Funny– they limit replies to their X posts– so much for “Giffords Courage.”
[Via Jess]
Let’s Go, Brandon!
Fair Means or Foul
Violence is hitting Ohio’s county fairs, and state law protects guns over fairgoers [More]
It would help if they told us which laws the violent would obey, and how making the peaceable more vulnerable to their predation would do anything but make it worse.
But, like typical statists, their answer is to disempower the individual and give more to the controllers, and call for more when that predictably doesn’t do anything but put free men in restraints.
You don’t hate “authorized journalists” enough.
[Via JG]
Just Like the Founders Intended with ‘Shall Not Be Infringed’
[T]he Department of Justice [is] fighting the so-called non-resident handgun ban that says that you cannot take a possession of a handgun in a state in which you are not a resident from an FFL. That’s right. This law is being challenged down there in Texas and the Department of Justice has just responded arguing that the law is indeed constitutional under our Second Amendment. Is it? [Watch]
Of course not.
Either the AUSA signing onto that is a still-embedded Democrat purposely undermining Pam Bondi’s memo, or it’s all smoke and mirrors and she was just telling gun owners what they wanted to hear to keep them corralled.
And so much for the new “Pro-gun” ATF mandarin NSSF is gushing over.
In either case, it once more illustrates that until the 2A Task Force includes actual 2A advocates instead of just government employees beholden to their masters, we can continue to expect DOJ bipolarity, with aggressive MAGA Über Alles types asking if we’d rather have Kamala.
There’s a reason the rice bowl gun groups aren’t demanding a seat at the table. They’ve been showering him with flattery and simultaneously walking on eggshells, afraid to p!$$ off a mercurial Trump, lest he condemn them and cast them out.
[Via Jess]
Beto Testing
Beto O’Rourke says he does not regret saying he will take away AK-47s and AR-15s while running for president [More]
He still hasn’t fleshed out how for us.
He was speaking as if he had presidential powers, so, say it’s through executive action or even a law he signed– presuming he’s replaced enough SCOTUS justices to reverse Bruen.
Now what?
What’s it going to take to get the guns away from the, say, Three Percent who will say “Hell no, you won’t,” despite seeing some picked off to be made examples of to spook the rest of the herd…?
How far is he willing to go, and what will that do to the smooth running of society?
Focus Group
Bklyn’s Newest Gun Store in 50 Years Opens With Focus on Education and Safety [More]
How Can You Tell John Cornyn’s Lying?
Meanwhile, Over Where the Shot Heard Round the World was Fired…
SAF Challenges Non-Resident Carry Permit Process in Massachusetts [More]
Can you imagine explaining this to Samuel Adams?
[Via Jess]
ALSO from SAF:
The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners secured a major victory today after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mandate overturning California’s “one-gun-per-month” restriction, setting a historic precedent.
I don’t see a link posted yet, but when it is you should be able to read the whole release here.
Welcome to the Party, Pals
When the Team is Up Against It, and the Breaks are Beating the Boys
The National Football League is suggesting good guys with guns be hired to protect all league facilities following the July 28, 2025, Manhattan shooting in which NFL headquarters were believed to have been the intended target. [More]
See…? They’re not “anti-gun.”
They just don’t want you to have one.
[Via bondmen]
Remember, Remember, the 5th of November
One in Five Britons Say They Are Willing to Engage in Political Violence to Stop National Decline [More]
They don’t think their rulers know that?
[Via bondmen]
Blasts from the Past
Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Edwin Walker discuss The Tragedy That Broke the Background Check System.This is about more than just erroneous firearm denials—it’s about a federal policy change that’s leading to massive Second Amendment infringements, and a branch of the ATF most people have never heard of. [More]
So… Fix NICS isn’t everything the quislings at NSSF crack it up to be…?
I look forward to an editorial from Larry Keane explaining how it would comport with Bruen’s text, history, and tradition standard.
[Via Jess]
Well, This was Completely Avoidable
If only some internal team existed to catch this stuff before it becomes an issue…
Well, I guess if the “gun groups” don’t care about not being included, I shouldn’t…
[Via Jess]
You Can Wish in One Hand
Southwest Washington gun shop seeks US Supreme Court review of magazine ban [More]
It’d go a lot further if the DOJ were serious about this and offered its support.
[Via Jess]
Hypocrites, Damn Hypocrites, and Zohran Mamdani
Zohran Mamdani Hires Private Security After Calling to Defund Police [More]
Why is Breitbart so focused on his anti-cop stance they ignore his total citizen disarmament fanaticism? The security company he’s hiring uses NYPD moonlighters, meaning they’re armed.
[Via bondmen]
It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Permanent’ Is
Petitioner contends (Pet. 7-21) that 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment as applied to her by subjecting her to “permanent” disarmament based on a years-old conviction for a nonviolent felony. Pet. 15. That contention lacks merit. The Department of Justice recently revitalized an administrative process under 18 U.S.C. 925(c) through which convicted felons can regain their ability to possess firearms. Given that process, petitioner cannot show (Pet. 15) that Section 922(g)(1) subjects her to “permanent” disarmament. [More]
Yeah, well, it would help if you guys who make noises that 2A is not a “second class right” would let everybody know what the non-arbitrary criteria are, but as yet you’ve ignored my FOIA request well past the statutory deadline. Are you going to make me file a complaint and then drag that on forever just like the Democrats? And then further discourage such rightful fact-finding by denying recovery of attorney fees?
Sorry if I can’t knee-jerk spin this as a positive. Because this really doesn’t tell us “how,” and a right delayed is a right denied.
[Via Jess]
