Colorado Department of Revenue Gets Police Powers to Go After Gun Stores [More]
Guess who won’t be affected by this. Go on, guess.
[Via JG]
Category: citizen disarmament
Sorry, Neighbors, They Wanted My Guns That Badly
Genocide-minded maniacs never seem to flesh that out.
The vacuous smirker’s somehow got a million followers, but from the ratioing this latest bit of idiocy received, I suspect they’re mostly people hes trolling. As for the post he started with, imagining mass gun confiscation, as noted before, the truth is they wouldn’t dare. Which means the Second Amendment is working (right you are, Nicholas).
There’s one other thing he’s forgetting, besides the obvious (NSFW): Bill Clinton’s Rules of Engagement. If we can’t turn to the Constitution for protection, what makes cheerleaders for tyranny think they can?
But I Have Promises to Keep, and Miles to Go Before I Sleep
“I will get rid of gun-free zones on schools, and — you have to — and on military bases,” Trump said, to scattered cheers during a campaign rally on Thursday night. “My first day, it gets signed, okay? My first day. There’s no more gun-free zones.” [More]
Don’t get too excited. He said that nine years ago.
[Via Henry]
The Top 25
Most Dangerous Places in the U.S. in 2024-2025 [More]
They just keep on corroborating…
How many have Democrat mayors, city councils and DAs who push citizen disarmament “laws”?
[Via Steve T]
Refugees Welcome!
GOP Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte is inviting law-abiding gun manufacturers in Colorado to come to his state in a new video ad [Watch]
I guess they had to add that “law-abiding” part.
Will any go?
Will any tell the state they’re cutting them off?
[Via Antigone]
About That ‘ Unvarnished Pro-Second Amendment Record…
A law recently signed by Republican Governor Kay Ivey makes it a felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, to possess parts intended to convert pistols into machine guns. [More]
That’s quite the “unwavering support“…
Serial Numbers
New England serial killer fears heighten after eighth idyllic town rocked by gruesome discovery [More]
Mass Shooting in Kashmir Enabled by Futile, Deadly ‘Gun Control’
The only people the laws stopped were the “law-abiding,” that is, the ones being slaughtered. [More]
They haven’t learned a thing since Mumbai. Then again, noting all the “commonsense gun safety laws” here, what have “we” learned?
Killers in Kashmir Assured of Helpless Victims by Law
Rage and despair after brazen attack kills 26 in Kashmir [More]
And naturally, the “law-abiding” victims were disarmed and their attackers were not.
I just spent the last hour writing an article for AmmoLand on this and will share the link when it’s up.
And Now, a Brief Commercial Message…
Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses a very innovative argument in the matter of Williams v. United States, yet another challenge to 18 USC Sec. 922(g)(1) the ban on felons possessing firearms. Today, we take a look at a crafty argument based upon the Commerce Clause and how, if accepted, could undo dozens of Federal gun laws. [Watch]
Good. That said, a review of text, history, and tradition of the Commerce Clause at the time of ratification would not have supported the expansion and usurpation of unintended powers to allow the feds to get their hooks into citizen disaramament, treasonous subsequent stare decisis saying they could notwithstanding.
And raising Tenth Amendment arguments isn’t exactly “new”:
Also, it’s helpful to keep in mind that the MFFA and its clones are really a states’ rights exercise, a challenge to federal commerce clause power on Tenth Amendment and other grounds. It is more about federal power than firearms.
[Via Jess]
A Taxing Proposition
The Power to Tax, The Second Amendment, and the Search for Which “‘Gangster’ Weapons” to Tax Which “‘Gangster’ Weapons” to Tax [More]
Stephen P. Halbrook has a new scholarly offering in the Wyoming Law Review.
Based on the man’s past contributions, I recommend you find the time to throughly read it. I know I will.
[Via JG]
Speaking of Miserable Ingrates…
Dem Says American Murdered by Illegal Alien is a ‘Distraction’ from Party’s Deportation Due Process Focus [More]
She’s all for “due process” unless it means guns will be taken away without a trial and conviction. (And what’s with politicians passing laws that affect us all pre-censoring comments that might oppose them?)
Funny, how she’s bent on imposing the same monopoly of violence tyranny her parents fled Iran over on the country that gave them refuge.
[Via Michael G]
Glockteasers
California Votes Yes To Pass “Glock Ban” [Watch]
But don’t worry. There’ll be plenty of exceptions.
So, don’t expect Glock to pull a Barrett.
[Via Jess]
The Obvious Solution
Anti-Gun Republican Sides with Democrats, Doubles Down on Historical Ignorance
Armed self-defense is “moronic.” Voting against it is “common sense.” [More]
With “Republicans” like this, who needs Democrats?
Background Noise
Summarized, “universal” background checks only apply to a fraction of a fraction of all gun acquisitions. As such, you cannot expect them to do much. But we didn’t expect to see gun homicides go up. [More]
But they work great for identifying some “gun criminals.”
More ‘Good First Steps’!
Bans Civilian Armories: They’ll define “armories” and slap a hard limit on how many firearms you can own, potentially forcing you to SURRENDER any guns over their arbitrary cap! Mandatory Gun Registration: Every single firearm you own will need to be registered with the state – a tyrant’s dream to track and control you! Purchase Limits: Caps how many guns you can buy per month, restricting your Constitutional right to arm yourself as you see fit! [More]
Just like the Founders intended!
And, of course, once they pass those they’ll be on to something else, because it will never be enough.
[Via cydl]
