Notes from the Resistance
Just learned today of the sickening limits set by Contra Costa County (pop. 1.2m) for their CCW licensees. No Single Action only pistol allowed. Yes, implicates the 1911, 2011 etc. No Weapon lights allowed No Red Dots allowed No Lasers allowed No more than 2 weapons allowed [More]
If anyone has credible links to confirm the claims, please share them in comments.
[Via Jess]
Take the guns first, due process later?
And then trust people officially considered to dangerous to own a gun to walk unrestrained among the rest of us?
Speaking of lunatic, if “gun control” and designating “prohibited persons” work, explain Chicago.
Meanwhile, the Democrats, once they get back in power because Republicans keep doing and saying stupid $#!+ like this, are setting things in motion to declare being anti-trans a mental illness and create a self-admitted record of it. Tell me if they could get away with it they wouldn’t demand that to be a “Hate Crime Prohibitor.”
Gee, what do you know: Collectivism (and that’s what such a ban would be predicated on) is two-edged sword.
Rights belong to each of us as individuals. My position on this hasn’t changed.
As for Kirk, he’s a Vichycon fraud. One who knowingly sends Turning Point USA members into harm’s way without adequate precautions, which makes it fair to wonder if he thinks THEIR sacrifice will be worth it.
Where do we get these “conservative influencers” from?
And what kind of Opposite Day Bizarro World are we living in where CNN et al. are backhandedly arguing for the Second Amendment?
Related UPDATE
CCRKBA: DOJ SHOULDN’T BAN GUNS FOR TRANS PEOPLE OVER INDIVIDUAL CRIMES [More]
Yep. That it’s even being discussed by anyone in the administration once more makes my point for me.
These lands belong to the people, and the people have the right to keep and bear arms. [More]
As Commander-in-Chief, this would be an easy and very popular fix with gun owners. Republicans facing midterms and “gun rights” groups take note how this would benefit you and get behind this now.
David Hogg: Trump Is a ‘Damn Coward’ For Not Changing Gun Laws [More]
Says the loudmouth who expects others to do his confiscations for him.
He doesn’t understand separation of powers, does he, not that any branch doing it would result in what they expect.
And this is CNN.
[Via bondmen]
Ohio officials are reminding educational, religious and nonprofit institutions across the state to consider a range of safety-related resources and funding opportunities. [More]
No, of course the one thing that will work isn’t included.
[Via JG]
Democratic lawmakers propose campus gun ban to improve safety at Wisconsin colleges [More]
Because nothing says “No Predators Allowed” like Gun-Free Zones!
I don’t suppose Wisconsin Democrats would also require these and have the Party indemnify schools found liable to pay out?
I guess we could ask Kelda…
[Via Mike F]
And if what they want is you…?
At first I thought I’d posted on this already, but when I checked saw that was just a parroted talking point.
[Via WiscoDave]
An officer should respect your right to legally carry — but what happens when he gets antsy and gets aggressive with you? In that moment, your heart’s racing, your hands are frozen, and you’re trying to decide if telling him you’re armed will calm him down or make things worse. [Watch]
Yeah, why don’t you consider his feelings for a change?
[Via Jess]
‘Tone-deaf’ protesters heckle Vance outside Minneapolis church shooting site [More]
I don’t see anybody in the photo of loser protesters who want our guns who looks like they could take them.
Lawsuit: Seattle sues Glock over handguns that can be turned into machine guns [More]
So getting in bed with grabbers doesn’t result in affection and respect?
[Via Jess]
Why Has Fort Worth – One of America’s Most Conservative Cities – Hired an Anti-Gun Police Chief? [More]
I’d start by looking at who “Republican” Mayor Mattie Parker joins with “to put aside partisan differences and pass common sense gun safety legislation.”
[Via Michael G]
[T]he 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has found that machine guns are not protected under the Second Amendment with really a terribly reasoned ruling. But the outcome is the one we want because, as I’ve explained to you before, unequivocally, 100% we 1,000% do not want a machine gun case to go to the United States Supreme Court. Anyone that disagrees with me is 1,000% wrong. If a machine gun case goes to the Supreme Court, we will 1,000% lose, which will create more bad Second Amendment precedent. And it will also delay, as an opportunity cost the decision that AR-15s and semi-automatic rifles are protected arms under the Second Amendment… [Watch]
The fact that his legal read on this is correct should be all the proof we need that the court benches are dominated by traitors.
[Via Jess]
Following its amicus brief in support of us, the federal government has asked the Seventh Circuit for approval to participate in oral arguments in our lawsuit challenging Illinois’ “assault weapon” and magazine bans [More]
How could they refuse? After all, “Currently, six of the court’s judges were appointed by Republicans and five by Democrats.”
Yeah, but one of those “Republicans” is treasonous dotard Frank Easterbrook…
[Via Jess]
Deadly triple shooting at apartment complex stemmed from robbery, Sacramento sheriff says… The sheriff’s office said all four men involved in the shooting had prior felony convictions and were prohibited from possessing guns. [More]
Being on probation with an ankle monitor was a nice touch.
And yeah, he absolutely had a right to defend himself. If they all had been in custodial care where they belong, guns would not have been part of the equation.
Why is it I get the feeling the goal isn’t really to reduce “gun violence”?
[Via DL]
Democrat Arizona Rep. Yassamin Ansari Calls Illegal Aliens Her ‘Constituents’ [More]
I still want to find out how this miserable ingrate can legally block feedback on a public policy post affecting all our rights from her legal constituents.
[Via JG]
Walz to call special session on gun control, propose assault weapons ban [More]
What lies must he have told NRA to get its endorsement? Apparently he didn’t have to, since his “unwavering pro-gun support” was based on “sportsmen” and “rich hunting heritage.”
[Via Jess]
