Hochul signs slate of new gun laws [More]
The biggest lie is the banner that says “Enough is Enough.”
Category: citizen disarmament
Speaking of Insatiable Lust…
If you think they are willing to stop at collecting machine guns, they will eventually go for your semi-automatic rifles. If you think they will stop at semi-automatic rifles, they’ll go for your bolt action and lever action rifles when you’re not looking. [More]
That’s why they call them “totalitarians.”
To paraphrase Martin Niemöller, “Then they came for the Fudds— and there was no one left to speak for them.
It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Infringement’ Is
Two such changes would require gun owners to obtain liability insurance to cover losses and damages from accidental use of firearms, and a new annual $25 harm reduction fee would be instituted for gun owners on each gun they own. The future funds would go to a nonprofit focused on gun violence education and prevention…The city would also ban anyone 18 years or younger from entering a gun dealership and would ban the sale of firearms from home-based businesses. [More]
Tell me THAT won’t reduce the “30% increase in homicides this year.”
And now it’s up to gun owners to cough up more money to let this drag on for years in the courts.
[Via Jess]
Saving Them from Themselves
A federal judge in New York has issued a permanent injunction against the Cortland Housing Authority prohibiting any sort of firearms ban against CHA tenants… [More]
Yet I’ll bet they overwhelmingly vote Democrat.
Going to Great Lengths
Kamala Harris Once Suggested It ‘Would Be Great’ To Ban All Gun Ownership [More]
What’s stopping her isn’t principle, it’s she doesn’t think she’s big enough to get away with it — yet.
What do people think prohibitionists mean by “common sense gun safety laws”?
Calling All Fudds
State attorneys: hunting rifles are not “constitutionally” protected in Connecticut… Whether or not they are constitutionally protected, they are certainly democratically protected,” Perry said. “As a rule, something that is popular doesn’t need constitutional protection, because it’s popular. [More]
And once they’re no longer popular?
Or in “common use” …?
The question nobody asks collectivist monkeys like Joshua Perry is if the Constitution doesn’t protect me, what makes you think it protects you?
Your turn in the barrel, Fudds.
Just because Polyphemus promised to eat you last didn’t mean he wasn’t going to.
[Via WiscoDave]
Old Stamping Ground
SAF BRIEF SUPPORTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION IN POST OFFICE CARRY CASE [More]
Jon Tester won’t be happy about that.
These are the Times That Try Men’s Souls
Speak for Yourself
A Dish Best Served Cold
CNN Commentator Says White People Who Don’t Vote For Kamala Harris Need to Be Held Accountable [More]
She just needs your guns first.
[Via bondmen]
Wrongthinking is Punishable
Speaking of ‘Single Issues’…
I recognize this is a quite sensitive topic, one that some would say is outside of the purview of Thoughtful Money. But this issue does have important economic implications, and from what I hear from viewers, many regular Americans feel they just don’t have a good sense of the facts on this situation. So I’m willing to take the risk here. [More]
I wish the damn “gun rights groups” were.
[Via bondmen]
What Part of ‘No’?
The Sun’ll Come Out Tomorrow
One Hell of a Way to Run a Republic
…we’re likely going to lose it because we’re in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit but a strong showing for the Second Amendment in this case and I think it’s going to give rise to good stuff… before the United States Supreme Court in the Snope-Bianchi case hopefully coming out this spring… [Watch]
So, in order to get over the wall we need to climb over the bodies of our fallen…
[Via Jess]
Double Vision
Trump’s vision for America: Guns everywhere, for anyone, with no questions asked. [More]
As opposed to Everytown’s vision, guns nowhere, for no one but the enforcers, no questions asked.
It does nothing to legalize “prohibited persons,” and if the law is ever followed, what’s the problem?
Notice the dusting off of the old “Chicago to Cheyenne” lie?
And using the “authoritative narrator’s” example (who is that impotent fool, anyway?), how many Montana ranchers have gone on a Big Apple shooting spree?
[Via Jess]
Step By Step
Vanderstok Case: SCOTUS Showdown Could Pave the Way for an ATF Ban on Semi-Autos [More]
What he said.
But what about Bruen?
What’s in an Aptronym?
Under the headline, “‘Brain flaws’: Understanding MAGA as an epidemic disease” and the subheadline, “Epidemiologist Dr. Gary Slutkin: MAGA is a ‘dangerous and lethal syndrome’ of ‘Authoritarian Violence Disorder,’” we are told Slutkin is “a distinguished epidemiologist, formerly with the World Health Organization.” And under the guise of stopping violence, he fires off this Nazi-style propaganda to inspire violence against Trump and his “diseased” supporters. [More]
That sounds libelous. Hey, it’s Salon…
It also sounds like a good reason for a medical board complaint to so label citizens one politically opposes.
Funny, what was once considered a psychiatric disorder and what’s considered on now. The whole thing seems pretty Soviet…
[Via bondmen]
An Appeal to Reason
Think you support universal background checks, red flag laws? Let’s test that [More]
He outlines three scenarios and makes a great case.
But the ones who need to hear his message be like:
