Category: citizen disarmament

Going with What Works

Both the White House and ATF have turned down multiple House Oversight inquiries into charges of ‘collusion’ with Chicago’s lawsuit against Glock [More]

Gee, when have we seen a Democrat administration stonewall House Oversight on gun-related scandals before…?

[Via Jess]

Memphis Bull

“Why do you want us to not be safe? Why do you want us to be poor?… Why do you want to break this community?” Walker said. “Because where we are with this gun violence and these ridiculous laws we cannot sustain like this. We have to stake a stand on behalf of our government independence.” [More]

Why do you say mandated defenselessness makes people safe? Why do you say collectivism and dependency makes them prosperous? Who is committing the violence?

I guess if her constituents are dumb enough to vote for a gaslighting racist commie, they pretty much deserve what they get. The point is, the rest of us don’t.

[Via Jess]

Single Issue Suicide

What that means for the future of the 2nd Amendment in a nation that is becoming majority-minority is pretty grim. Every three million new mestizo voters is a net one million voters who want more gun control and even if they aren’t really concerned with it, will agree to more gun control if that is what it takes to get more free stuff. [More]

It’s nice to know mine is not a lone voice, but I am wondering where the hell everybody else is.

[Via CP]

Weapons of Law

Buffalo Tops Friendly Market Shooting Survivors and Family Members Sue Manufacturer of Gun Lock, Gun Store, Manufacturer of Combat-Style Body Armor, Social Media Companies, and Shooter’s Parents [More]

Go with what works, right?

These people understand something “our side,” always playing defense, has yet to embrace.

[Via Jess]

A Good First Step

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Federal District Court Judge Iain D. Johnston has declared the State of Illinois’ ban on carrying firearms on public transportation and in public transportation facilities unconstitutional as applied to the named plaintiffs in the FPC-supported lawsuit Schoenthal v. Raoul. [More]

Good. But don’t overlook “The State is expected to appeal the decision.”

[Via Jess]

Lie After Lie with This Guy

“Yeah, I said we were talking in this case, this was after a school shooting, the ideas of carrying these weapons of war. And my wife, the English teacher, told me my grammar is not always correct,” he said. [More]

Says the guy who taught English in China…

And he’s not the only one making unbelievable excuses:

Tim Walz’s ties to China are not concerning

We’re the Only Ones Normal Enough

Defendant Hines … did not mention that Plaintiff’s mother had initiated the encounter by calling emergency services to express concern about a trespasser… and he stated—incorrectly—that Plaintiff had been charged with aggravated assault… Finally, he wrote that Plaintiff complied with the officers’ commands and told officers he had been afraid for the safety of his grandmother (apparently an erroneous reference to Plaintiff’s mother) [More]

And a “trained professional” being sloppily incompetent and incapable of filing an accurate police report is enough to disarm a citizen…?

Normal PD, eh? Where the chief can have a gun in his carry-on with no consequences?

Four Boxes Diner breaks the case down.

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights