A Woman’s Touch

DC Project – Women for Gun Rights [More]

Seems like a good idea to counter the Demanding Moms…

Anybody know who’s backing them? The website is registered through a proxy and they’re too new to show up on Guidestar.

I like to know who the hidden interests are, because when I see advice from ostensible major influencers like “Don’t reference the Constitution” on their “How to Talk About Guns, Safety, and Protecting the Civil Rights of All Americans” download — that and “Enforce the thousands of existing laws on the books” — my spider-sense starts tingling.

Going with What Works

Today, the National Association for Gun Rights filed a lawsuit against the ATF, National Association for Gun Rights v. Garland, in federal court in the Northern District of Texas. This action was filed in the same appellate circuit that ruled earlier this year that bump stocks are not machine guns in Cargill v. Garland. [More]

More and more NAGR is showing itself to be a major player on the national scene worthy of support. Perhaps it’s time to bury the past.

[Via Jess]

The Sign of the (Double) Cross

Tennessee Governor Bill Lee Officially Calls for a Special Session on Public Safety; Moms Demand Action, Students Demand Action, March For Our Lives, Giffords and Brady Respond [More]

He’s not only inviting them in, he’s holding the door open for them and offering them a drink.

They’re crossing the threshold and he’s crossing the Rubicon.

I’m going to start calling him Bloomberg’s Renfield.

[Via Jess]

The Rest of the Story

So if the Question’s Unlawful We Can Lie?

Federal gun law used in Hunter Biden case voided by appeals court [More]

The sooner this gets resolved, the sooner I can resume finding out what I’m looking for — or at least go through another round of stonewalling.

Hey, if they have to change the 4473, will they declare the old one invalid and take their time issuing a new one?

[Via Dan Gifford]

Why Would People Who Ignore the Second Amendment Pay Attention to the Sixth?

California Supreme Court: No Right to In-Person Cross-Examination of Accuser During Campus Sexual Assault Proceedings [More]

Well, yeah, we’re supposed to #BelieveWomen.

Noting some “women” are more equal than others.

[Via Michael G]

Save Us from Ourselves?

We are clearly in a war zone,” he added. [More]

So logic would dictate the victims need “weapons of war” to repel the aggressors. I mean, it was supposed to be good enough for Ukraine, and we do have a Second Amendment…

Instead, the answer is more government enforcement, including the National Guard? Sure be nice if these people got their stories straight

Can you imagine how DC and Democrat cities across the land would enjoy the “mostly peaceful” experience if some white guardsman pulled a Michael Brown redux?

[Via Jess]