The Power to Destroy

“California effectively seeks the power to destroy the exercise of a constitutional right by singling it out for special taxation,” the lawsuit alleges. “If this tax is permitted, there is nothing stopping California from imposing a 50% or even 100% tax on a constitutional right it disfavors whether it be the right to keep and bear arms, the right to free exercise of religion, or any other right.” [More]

Just like if one gun a month is good, one gun a year is better!

Or if a three-day waiting period…

Here’s the complaint.

[Via Jess]

Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth

The justices in a 6-3 vote on nonideological lines handed a win to defendant Joseph Fischer, who is among hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants — including former President Donald Trump — who have been charged with obstructing an official proceeding over the effort to prevent Congress’ certification of President Joe Biden’s election victory. [More]

That’s great news. But once again, Amy Coney Barrett casts doubt on her appointment.

She gave us Bruen, but as the saying goes, “What has she done for us lately?”

As I noted at the time:

While Barrett’s confirmation should give gun owners a degree of hope and should certainly be viewed as more positive than a Biden nominee being placed on the High Court, we’ll need to wait and see if the gun groups or the gun-grabbers are right in their assessments. Republican appointments have disappointed in the past. Warren Burger and David Souter coming to mind.

Back to J6, that means hundreds have been falsely accused, arrested, prosecuted,and imprisoned. Who will pay?

Democrats are still out there smearing them as insurrectionists and traitors.

This They’ll Defend

Army Admits Link Between COVID Vaccine and Soldier’s Heart Condition [More]

The coercion was strong.

For the rest, there was propaganda. Now let’s listen to those same celebrities on guns!

[Via Michael G]

Related UPDATE

Explosive Study Once Removed by Lancet within 24 Hours, Now Peer-Reviewed and Public: Reveals 74% of Deaths Directly Linked to COVID-19 Shot [More]

You’d think if this were real news it would be all over the DSM… no…?

[Via bondmen]

An Age-Old Question

The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a federal lawsuit challenging Pennsylvania’s prohibition against allowing young adults aged 18 to 20 from acquiring a license to carry a firearm (LTCF) for personal protection. The case is known as Brown v. Paris. [More]

If nothing else, it’s a mockery of U.S. Code:

The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age…

Drilling down further, anyone see anything in here about a license? Yeah, I know, increments. Just sayin’…

Verified by MonsterInsights