Category: Legal

A Good First Step

Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of election integrity! Voters in Arizona who register with the state and do not provide proof of citizenship will be rejected. [More]

Why this is even an issue is a testament to the success of the subversives.

“Before: BADE, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges,” eh?

I’m not holding my breath for what the full court will do.

[Via Michael G]

Back to Square One

Gee, I wonder what happens next.

[Via Jess]

Half-Full Faith and Credit

“Imagine your surprise if you are just minding your own business, wherever you are, Ohio, Alabama, Texas, and all of a sudden, your local constable is, like, “Guess what sucker, California says you’re not allowed to have any guns anymore, give them up.” [Watch]

Gun laws don’t work both ways, so your permit and lawful ownership won’t be recognized there.

Heads they win, tails you lose.

[Via Jess]

It’s Not Like It Says ‘Shall Not Be Infringed’ or Anything…

Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in NRA-ILA-Supported Challenge to Delaware’s ban on “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.” [More]

Here’s their weasel-wording to justify tyranny.

Mark W. Smith navigates the fabricated complexities.

[Via Jess]

The Letter of the Law

Missouri execution plans move forward despite prosecutor trying to overturn murder conviction… Judges ruled that they do not have the procedural authority to withdraw the execution order at this time. [More]

So much for securing the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.

I’m just surprised they didn’t say he doesn’t have standing.

[Via Michael G]

We’re the Only Ones Unwarranted Enough

The decision, first announced by the Institute for Justice, means that Tennessee wildlife officers will no longer be allowed to access private lands unless they have explicit permission of the landowner, or have obtained a court-ordered search warrant. [More]

Damn Constitution takes all the fun out of being a JBF (Jackbooted Fudd)…

[Via Michael G]

The Power to Destroy

“California effectively seeks the power to destroy the exercise of a constitutional right by singling it out for special taxation,” the lawsuit alleges. “If this tax is permitted, there is nothing stopping California from imposing a 50% or even 100% tax on a constitutional right it disfavors whether it be the right to keep and bear arms, the right to free exercise of religion, or any other right.” [More]

Just like if one gun a month is good, one gun a year is better!

Or if a three-day waiting period…

Here’s the complaint.

[Via Jess]