Notes from the Resistance
I have nothing to add.
“We respect the Second Amendment and want people to know their rights and adhere to the law,” Chief Troche said. [More]
That’s why you gear up for war when citizens know their rights better than you do, Chief?
And with Sarasota leaning Republican, how is it the commission is dominated by Democrats?
Report exposes culture of hazing and humiliation at Cape Cod police academy [More]
There’s truth to the observation that most bullies were bullied. So guess who they’re prepping these attack dogs for.
There’s also truth to another observation: No job is worth your dignity, and anyone who tolerates and submits to abuse will only ensure more of it.
[Via Edmund M]
“I guess just the way you guys were eating chips… It picked it up as a gun,” a police officer told the students in the video. “AI’s not the best.” [More]
Hey, it wasn’t the AI that attacked the kid. Are you guys sure you know how to use it?
Still, the rope-selling capitalists don’t have qualified immunity. And it looks like people are starting to recognize that.
“This is South Central Los Angeles,” Gochez told a crowd at a Tuesday evening anti-ICE protest. “They are not the only ones with guns in this city. They’re not the only ones and don’t forget that.” [More]
That’s been pretty much my argument. Except I knpow better than “military AR-15s.” And I’m not a f_n’ commie.
Ironically, when armed resistance breaks out, it will be in “gun controlled” Democrat strongholds, proving another argument some of us have been making.
[Via bondmen]
An armed gang of shoplifters is terrorizing NYC supermarkets— and grocers say NYPD is ignoring the rampage [More]
Wait ’til Zohran the Red takes over with his peoples’ collective markets, enhanced citizen disarmament, repurposed police, and treatment of criminals as social justice equalizers.
I see some Vichycons are still pushing for gungrabber Curtis to either stay in or to step aside form Cuomo. They can all go to hell– and will. Me, I’m makin’ popcorn.
[Via bondmen]
‘He thinks he’s elected king’ – Missouri AG blasts jailed sheriff [More]
Ironic, considering he’s a Democrat and they’re the ones giving the Marxists furious useful idiot foot soldiers for the No Kings rallies.
[Via bondmen]
Law enforcement agencies will soon have easier access to footage captured by Amazon’s Ring smart cameras. In a partnership announced this week, Amazon will allow approximately 5,000 local law enforcement agencies to request access to Ring camera footage via surveillance platforms from Flock Safety. Ring’s cooperation with law enforcement and the reported use of Flock technologies by federal agencies, including US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has resurfaced privacy concerns that have followed the devices for years. [More]
Hey, if you have nothing to hide and haven’t done anything wrong, what’s the problem?
[Via Michael G]
But that didn’t stop anti-gun D.C. police from slapping the cuffs on Avissar. Why? Because he had a completely legal trigger in his suitcase — and made the mistake of calling it a “conversion device” when questioned. [More]
[Via Michael G]
Dad charged with killing his 14-year-old daughter’s rapist now running for sheriff: ‘It’s about restoring trust’ [More]
While I can sympathize:
A. He’s a prohibited person until he can get charges dismissed and would be a sheriff who can’t have a gun and is likely to go to prison.
and
B. I have to put my trust in respecting due process, not in giving enforcement powers to a man who has already proven he would deny it.
[Via Michael G]
Abigail Spanberger has consistently aligned herself against law enforcement. For the PBA to throw its support behind her is not only baffling — it is reckless, tone-deaf, and dangerous. [More]
That’s shallow thinking, to believe the primary function of the union is to protect its members. The primary function is to advance subversion, and when it comes to that, it’s understood by the commissars that their individual “causes” will take a back seat to that.
[Via bondmen]
Sen. Johnson introduces legislation to fix serious problems in Ohio… SB 278 seeks to add teeth to the law by giving individuals the power to seek punitive damages against cities that pass gun control measures… SB 279 would make it illegal for a business, state agency, or political subdivision from preventing an off-duty law enforcement officer from carrying a firearm. [More]
So those who would impose new laws on us willfully violate what’s already on the books with impunity? Yeah, punishing Democrats would be nice. Too bad it’s not the politicians themselves who have to pay but the poor tax slobs they already overburden.
As for off-duty cops, yeah, I know, it’s another carve out for “Only Ones,” but like I said in my Firearms News report exposing the illegal rule at Youngstown State’s stadium and citing existing Ohio Revised Code:
[T]he issue here is YSU officials do not have authority to override state preemption on gun laws and impose local prohibitions.
So, basically, we’re talking two new laws to enforce two existing laws.
And here you thought government was ludicrously overblown, redundant, and wasteful…
Blue city street takeover suspects torched police cruiser in ‘hell-bent’ attack on cops: union chief [More]
‘Takeover” = conquest. Temporary, for now.
In other words, Democrat cities can’t only not protect you, the Only Ones can’t protect themselves and they won’t allow you to protect yourself.
I wonder what Sam Adams and John Hancock would have had to say about that.
Looking around for more information on Boston lawlessness, I found a hypocritical excuse for a projected homicide increase:
…small increases in homicides look large in percentage terms
What have I been saying about the grabbers using rates to try and paint low population red states with concentrations of blue as more violent? A few incidents within a smaller overall population will yield a higher RATE than many incidents within a larger population.
Luigi Mangione’s lawyers seek a dismissal of federal charges in CEO killing [More]
Was he required to be read his rights at the time he started incriminating himself? Did exigent circumstances at the time of his arrest preclude the need for a warrant?
If this guy walks because basic arrest protocols weren’t followed, who should the forehead-slapping outrage be directed against?
And what does all of this say about Democrat women that Orwell didn’t already figure out?
[Via Michael G]
