Hunter Biden requests new trial after conviction in gun case [More]
I’m surprised no 2A group has offered to help. All I can figure is they think he will lose and don’t want to be associated with that.
[Via Jess]
Notes from the Resistance

The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a federal lawsuit challenging Pennsylvania’s prohibition against allowing young adults aged 18 to 20 from acquiring a license to carry a firearm (LTCF) for personal protection. The case is known as Brown v. Paris. [More]
If nothing else, it’s a mockery of U.S. Code:
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age…
Drilling down further, anyone see anything in here about a license? Yeah, I know, increments. Just sayin’…
The text of the Second Amendment plainly does not guarantee a right to purchase an unlimited number of firearms within a 30-day period. [More]
I’m pretty sure “arms” is plural.
Of course, the miserable traitor Rob Bonta knows that.
Subversive Democrats pull this in-your-face $h!+ because they’re confident they can without repercussions.
[Via Jess]

Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the Gun Owners Foundation today teamed up with the Coalition of New Jersey Firearm Owners to challenge the state’s onerous permitting requirements to purchase handguns as well as New Jersey’s arbitrary “one gun a month” law. [More]
You mean states that signed on to the Constitution might have balked if they saw a list of permissible infringements?
Either that or more “Only Ones”…
And speakling of Murphy’s Lies… uh… law, here he is talking to the head of the White House Office of Gun Violence prevention, who shows is seasoned grasp of what’s going on with this bit of inanity:
“There was no federal law that actually made it a crime to straw purchase or to engage in firearms trafficking…”
Liars and emasculated dolts presume to define your rights.

The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a federal lawsuit in Texas challenging the ban on firearms carry in U.S. Post Offices and on postal property as violations of the Second Amendment, and is seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. [More]
Good on them. Way past time for this…
Anti-Gun Billionaire Michael Bloomberg Funds Backing Sheri Biggs in South Carolina’s 3rd District … Biggs has portrayed herself as a political outsider who is “pro-Second Amendment and pro-Trump.” However, one of the PACs backing her appears to come from anti-Second Amendment sources. [More]
The runoff is in a week. It’s up to these guys to set the record straight before then:

[Via bondmen]
Sen. Murphy says Supreme Court is readying to ‘fundamentally rewrite’ Second Amendment after bump stock ruling [More]
Says the rewriter. Says the side of serial infringers who, with a practiced straight face, contradict themselves every time they declare “We can respect the Second Amendment but…”
Will US Supreme Court Hear ‘Spirit of Aloha’ Gun Rights Case? [More]
Or will barbaric primitives continue to impose Kapu traditions?
The organization, called Police Leaders for Community Safety, will prop up anti-gunner candidates running for Congress in the hopes of getting more gun control laws passed at the federal level. [More]
The money behind it is what I want to trace.
They don’t show up on Guidestar yet, and their website is registered by proxy, and so far, it doesn’t look like they have the guts to open a “social media” account so gun owners can publicly tell these grunting oinkers what they think of them.
[Via Andy M]
‘Squad’ Rep. Jamaal Bowman trending toward landslide loss to NY Dem rival George Latimer: new poll [More]
George may be a more effective enemy.
[Via Jess]
57 F. 4th 447, affirmed. [More]
Bump Stocks Now Legal Again As Supreme Court Strikes Down Gun Device Ban
Looks like ATF will have to surrender my bump stock back to me when I come to confiscate it from them.

UPDATE
Herschel points out a concern with “Alito’s “Machinegun Sammy’s” response.
I agree. Congress has no Constitutional authority to “act,” either.
Judge Reed O’Connor Vacates ATF Pistol Brace Rule [More]
Herschel has the links.
UPDATE
Now I’ve got to go get a better one than this:

NY legislature passes bill requiring posted warning in gun stores [More]
“We need to revolutionize the way we look at guns, like what we did with cigarettes … It used to be that smoking was a glamour symbol—cool, sexy, macho. Now it is dirty, deadly—and banned.”
Is there anything in the law that prohibits posting this right next to it?

[Via bondmen]
California law prohibiting gun shows at county fairs upheld by federal appeals court in unanimous decision [More]
Years ago, before the Great Western Gun Show was forced out of California, I recall being especially bitter over how it could attract tens of thousands of gun owners–yet a counter-protest against the Million Moms preceded by announcements and appeals throughout the “activist” network, only drew a few hundred. And out of all Los Angeles, we’d be lucky to get 50 to show up at an NRA Members’ Council meeting, and of those, maybe half a dozen– of the same people all the time– actually did any work.
Add the engineered demographic shift our “gun rights leaders” say doesn’t qualify for “single issue” consideration, and the traditional uselessness of California Republicans, and no other outcome was possible.
Appealing to the full Ninth Circuit won’t reverse things. That’s just a requisite step to denial, and then hoping the Supreme Court will hear it and that it still has a favorable majority.
[Via Jess]