Notes from the Resistance
Buffalo Tops Friendly Market Shooting Survivors and Family Members Sue Manufacturer of Gun Lock, Gun Store, Manufacturer of Combat-Style Body Armor, Social Media Companies, and Shooter’s Parents [More]
Go with what works, right?
These people understand something “our side,” always playing defense, has yet to embrace.
[Via Jess]
Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Federal District Court Judge Iain D. Johnston has declared the State of Illinois’ ban on carrying firearms on public transportation and in public transportation facilities unconstitutional as applied to the named plaintiffs in the FPC-supported lawsuit Schoenthal v. Raoul. [More]
Good. But don’t overlook “The State is expected to appeal the decision.”
[Via Jess]
Is Hispanic Support for Gun Control A Cause for Concern? [More]
You have to ask?
The “pathway to citizenship” is the existential threat.
As for existing ones, care to try for some NRA ratings?
No shortage of sellouts here, too…
Sure, outreach is- a fine and necessary idea. All gun groups should have been doing it. Just don’t forget to compare grassroots fundraising to what’s needed to compete for eyes and ears with this…
[Via Andy M]
The Court should not grant certiorari to review at this stage but should permit the ordinary percolation process to continue and reserve its intervention for the point at which, if it comes at all, the courts of appeals are actually divided.” [More]
I understand what they’re doing and why.
It’s not them, it’s a fraudulent power-usurping system that allowed the first infringement to take place and has done nothing since but entrench and assail.
There is no parallel “pro-Second Amendment Democrat” movement happening. That’s because there’s no such thing as one. [More]
Yeah, I believe in unicorns, too.
Massachusetts strikes down a 67-year-old switchblade ban, cites landmark Supreme Court gun decision [More]
Because it’s Masssachussetts, part of me wonders “What are they up to?”
You know their personal sentiments are more in line with California’s.
[Via Jess]
Court upholds gun ban for migrants in US unlawfully [More]
As noted before, this is a red herring.
[Via Jess]
The last version made me afraid to shave my beard.
How They Can Use the Rule on Unfinished Frames and Receivers to Disarm a LOT of You [Watch]
How They Can Use the Rule on Unfinished Frames and Receivers to TRY TO Disarm a LOT of You
There, I fixed it for ya.
Now I’m waiting for some genius on “our side” to say “Only Congress has that authority.”
To prohibit the imposition of requirements that handguns have certain features generally absent from firearms in common use, and to restore the civil and natural rights of Americans in States hostile to liberty, and for other purposes. [More]
And when Republicans are in a position to actually roll back an infringement…?
Besides: What about arms NOT in common use by any except the standing army because the government won’t allow them to be?
[Via Jess]
27 states urge Supreme Court to reject Biden administration’s rule defining gun parts [More]
The court’s ability and inclination to produce favorable future rulings depends on what happens in November, for those of you who believe sitting on your hands because it doesn’t make any difference is defensible.
[Via Jess]
California Raising Background Check Fee’s 500%, Get Ready [Watch]
Hey, if $5 is “better” than $1, how much “better” would $50 be? What’s to stop it?
Guess who won’t pay a dime, chumps.
[Via Jess]
We’re not interested in negotiating our rights that you and your fellow travelers have no claim to. Come and take them. [More]
An impotent peacenik dolt lays down the terms of surrender.
A U.S. appeals court on Friday upheld Maryland’s licensing requirements for people seeking to buy handguns, saying the law remained valid even after a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2022 that expanded gun rights. [More]
Anybody know which clause from Bruen Obama-appointee Barbara Milano Keenan cherry-picked to justify a clear prior restraint?
[Via Jess]
The promise to “listen to GOA” is what we’ll need to remind him of. And he needs to understand there are difference between them and NRA, and why.
Let’s hope historical analogues don’t come back to bite us. Rather than digging up what some colony did to infringe in special circumstances or older English law, put the focus on arguments put forth during ratification. We know what the founders meant, and there was nothing ambuiguous about it.
Anybody else having trouble digging up info on the defendant and his Glock switches? I’m wondering if what’s gun owners may be celebrating as a victory is actually part of an effort to turn the public against Bruen.
[Via WiscoDave]
