Notes from the Resistance
HB 3075, the bill to implement the gun bans in Mz 114 has been scheduled for a hearing on March 17. [More]
What’s the point of having the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision if states can ignore it with impunity?
As you no doubt know, the Oregon Appeals Court has ruled Mz 114 “constitutional.” [More]
I submitted an AmmoLand article on this yesterday and will link up when it’s posted.
The Seventh Circuit Upholds NFA Restrictions on SBRs in United States v. Rush [More]
Not bearable arms…? Who are these treasonous ignoramuses on the three judge panel??
Oh:
[Via Jess]
About two weeks ago, Ms. Oyer was put on a working group to restore gun rights to people convicted of crimes, she said. [More]
Four Boxes Diner explains the significance.
See, it’s not “prickly” at all, Mel.
Well, maybe for NRA President “Lautenberg Bob” Barr…
[Via Jess]
Is Bondi Going to Deliver on 2A or Not? [More]
Well, she’s already missed the 30-day deadline.
We need to keep realistic expectations on what she can do and whaty she can’t do. That said, one thing she can is to stand down where they’re being d!cks in court.
[Via Andy M]
Washington House Dems Pass Permit-to-Purchase Bill; Defies 2A, Say Critics [More]
That means the Marxists in charge can say “No,” and expand denial criteria with majority votes. This is naked, in-your-face tyranny.
As Constitutional scholar Edwin Vieira Jr. noted in Kolbe v. Hogan:
“This reliance on a permanent private market for firearms guaranteed that most militiamen, through their own efforts, could always obtain firearms suitable for both collective and individual self-defense, and forestalled tyranny by precluding rogue public officials from monopolizing the production, distribution, and possession of firearms.”
That’s why it’s a mistake to rely exclusively on “self defense” in legal arguments and avoid making a case for the Constitutiopnal Militia.
If you want to fight for your rights against the unlimited power and treasure of the state, you’re on your own. That’s “the reasonableness of the government’s position.” [More]
We’re about to find out how different the new administration is from the old one when it comes to citizens being forced to fight for their rights.
Trump Addresses Congress: One Hundred Minutes and Not a Peep About the Second Amendment – How much of a priority are your gun rights? [More]
And as for that EO, it looks like Bondi’s late.
[Via Jess]
As of right now they have posted it as an “informational” hearing with “invited testimony only.” That means that only their handpicked, anti-gun shills will be allowed to speak. [More]
Welcome to the tyranny of the majority, aka Democrat rule.
What this means is the Form 4473 will need to be revised again if ATF is to comply with the executive order. [More]
Don’t let this distract from a more basic argument.
It sounds more like reserve “Only Ones,” and Founding era thought leaders weren’t big on “select militias.” [More]
Letting those with an agenda redefine terms ignores the real argument.
It’s taking care of our immediate needs. However, the Founders bequeathed us a constitution intended “to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” If this is all we concern ourselves with, what are we bequeathing to them? Semiautomatic firearm technology that’s already 140 years old…? In a world where technological developments and breakthroughs are being introduced seemingly exponentially, what new “terrible implements” will become standard issue in the next 140 years? [More]
In avoiding legal traps today, care must be taken not to catch ourselves in a more dangerous one tomorrow.
If only the Founders had conceived of a way that Americans could band together in times of existential threat and to provide for what was “necessary to the security of a free state…” [More]
Who thinks disarming before the collapse “top men” are preparing for is a good idea?
This morning, AzCDL’s case against Pima County for its violation of Arizona’s firearm preemption law (A.R.S. § 13-3108) ended in victory for your rights! Judge Greg Sakall of the Arizona Superior Court in Pima County rejected the county’s motion to dismiss the case and granted our request for summary judgment. Judge Sakall ruled from the bench in our favor on all claims! [More]
Great. Now, what personal disincentives did he apply to keep Arizona grabtards from trying again?
[Via Henry Bowman]
Top officials, in all branches of government, the police, and the military, are in the pockets of the cartels. [More]
Don’t think of them as partners. Think of them as conjoined twins.
The Anti-ATF Commandeering Act has the intended purpose in its title to “prohibit the provision of material aid and support for enforcement of federal firearms laws.” House Bill 1481 bases its justification on the finding that “the United States Supreme Court has long held that states do not have to participate in the enforcement or effectuation of federal acts or regulatory programs.” [More]
So, what about states that refuse to help ICE deport illegals? Isn’t it the same thing?
The Arkansas bill supports “the supreme Law of the Land.” So-called “sanctuary” laws undermine it.
[Via Jess]
