Notes from the Resistance
Are we certain, from our brief and privileged vantage point, that our familiar way of life will forever be the norm, when everything that has gone before us shows we are, instead, the extremely lucky beneficiaries of a rare and fortunate convergence of circumstances, and one that has only been preserved under the force of arms? [More]
My fourth and final “Gun Rights” column for the last issue of American Handgunner, which has discontinued going to print…
And point of order:
It says “shall not be infringed,” not “shall not be denied,” but, of course, they know that. And the Framers would have never stood for “shall issue.”
I do get a kick on seeing others pick up on the “bipolar”meme.
[Via Jess]
Inside The 3D Printed Gun Movement—And The Government’s Attempts To Spy On It [More]
“Full might,” eh?
[Via WiscoDave]
It’s all part of that bipolarity we’ve been talking about.
Fortunately, there’s a cure. We’ve even got the legal wrangles and alternatives figured out.
Except none of the rice bowl groups want to play. They say they have their own contacts, and apparently perceived exclusivity if their priority. Except that means things get done in secret with our rights that we may not agree with– as has happened before and will happen again — and the bipolar disappointments and flat-out reneging and betrayals will continue, the groups will continue to walk on eggshells so no administration feathers are ruffled, and popular 2A cheerleaders will convince a critical mass that it’s not only a good thing, but masterful 3D chess.
The Second Amendment Preservation Act (SAPA) was shelved last December, and lawmakers have done nothing to advance it in nearly a year. Which means the critical time for action is NOW! … With complete republican control in Ohio, there is no excuse for the lack of pro-gun wins in 2025, so let your elected officials know you are displeased with their lack of support for the Second Amendment. [More]
Yeah we can expect better than redundancy and “Only Ones.”
Three people were hospitalized after they were injured Saturday afternoon in a shooting in Mattapan, according to Boston police. [More]
Huh. We were just talking Boston and the Massachusetts Democrats who won’t let you defend yourself.
So why won’t the purveyors of “our democracy” let the people vote on that? And now Orwellian is “protect[ing] Mass. gun laws from upcoming ballot question” as opposed to protecting the right of citizens to vote on their own safety?
Looks like the violence monopolists succeeded– the measure didn’t make the list.
[Via Edmund M]
Sen. Johnson introduces legislation to fix serious problems in Ohio… SB 278 seeks to add teeth to the law by giving individuals the power to seek punitive damages against cities that pass gun control measures… SB 279 would make it illegal for a business, state agency, or political subdivision from preventing an off-duty law enforcement officer from carrying a firearm. [More]
So those who would impose new laws on us willfully violate what’s already on the books with impunity? Yeah, punishing Democrats would be nice. Too bad it’s not the politicians themselves who have to pay but the poor tax slobs they already overburden.
As for off-duty cops, yeah, I know, it’s another carve out for “Only Ones,” but like I said in my Firearms News report exposing the illegal rule at Youngstown State’s stadium and citing existing Ohio Revised Code:
[T]he issue here is YSU officials do not have authority to override state preemption on gun laws and impose local prohibitions.
So, basically, we’re talking two new laws to enforce two existing laws.
And here you thought government was ludicrously overblown, redundant, and wasteful…
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a law banning sales of one of the most popular types of handgun in the U.S… It covers handguns manufactured by Glock, as well as similarly designed pistols, that use a “cruciform trigger bar,” which lawmakers said makes them easily convertible to fully automatic fire. [More]
So that’s what being “a trusted partner of law enforcement” gets you…
That and “compromising” to save your skin…
The “cool” thing is the “Only Ones” exemption is still there! That might actually be what keeps the PLCAA in play, although I’m sure there are Democrat activist federal judges eager to impose nationwide injunctions.
And I’m sure there’ll be no shortage of gun companies eager to keep the enforcers armed and ready to confiscate.
[Via Jess]
What issues should be tackled first on day one? [More]
That’s assuming there’s going to be a Day One.
And too bad there’s no inclusive “2A Task Force” to impress their expectations on a president who’s showing deliberate indifference.
Via Henry Bowman, who sent this:
Solicitor General Defends NFA Taxation and Registration Scheme for Short-Barreled Rifles… “When it comes to federal gun laws, it’s hard to differentiate the DOJ under Pam Bondi from the DOJ under Merrick Garland. [More]
Would it be catty if I said I’m waiting for Mark Smith to declare “They say that like it’s a bad thing”?
[Via Andy M]
Related UPDATE
Ah, here we go:
The bottom line is the DOJ’s ultimate conclusion is okie dokie with us. But but sort of some of the methodological arguments they made: Not so smoothie poothie.
I get that it might not be the “right” case. That doesn’t excuse the arguments.
On a side note, I haven’t cringed that much since GW said “Pootie-Poot.”
[Via Jess]
ATF charging individuals for 3D-printed FRTs [More]
Maybe we missed a footnote in the memo…?
Looks like some FA was going on before FO kicked into gear … but still, from a “shall not be infringed” point of view…
Comment from an advisor:
The ATF special agent swore out a a false statement “FRT has the capability to turn a semi auto rifle into a fully auto rifle”. I guess he/she/it/they did not get the memo posted on the DOJ website? PS: Dude was a fool to do this in DC and bigger fool to attempt to install into a rented range gun.
As for who the “gun rights lawyer with a significant amount of legal 3D2A experience” might be, an AI search yielded this:
who is r/FOSSCAD top law blawg?
Based on available information, there is no designated “top law blawg” for the FOSSCAD community. FOSSCAD is a decentralized and leaderless online community, not an organization with official spokespeople or designated legal bloggers. The group focuses on the development and sharing of open-source designs for 3D-printed firearms.
For legal information, members typically rely on community discussions and independent research, though they are subject to legal scrutiny and potential law enforcement action.
Here’s why you won’t find a single, authoritative legal voice for FOSSCAD:
Decentralized structure: The FOSSCAD community defines itself as a “decentralized cluster of people and bots” with “no members or leaders”. This makes the concept of an official legal authority incompatible with its structure.
Legal risk: Providing legal advice, particularly regarding the manufacturing of firearms, is highly regulated. An individual positioning themselves as the definitive “law blawg” for this topic would open themselves up to significant legal and professional risks.
Legal complexity: The laws around 3D-printed firearms (“ghost guns”) are complex and vary significantly between federal, state, and local jurisdictions. What is legal in one state may be a felony in another, and these laws are subject to constant change.
Recent platform bans: The r/fosscad subreddit, a hub for the community, was banned from Reddit in September 2025. This shows how platforms can restrict these discussions, making a long-running, public legal “blawg” unlikely to thrive.
For legal questions about 3D-printed firearms, individuals within the FOSSCAD community often refer to official sources or consult legal professionals, as online legal commentary is not considered authoritative.
The U.S. Senate on Thursday confirmed Jennifer Mascott, President Donald Trump’s latest nominee to the federal appeals court in Philadelphia, further shifting the court’s ideological balance to the right. [More]
Anybody ask her some pointed questions?
Or are we just making $#!+ up?
[Via Jess]
Related UPDATE
Major, major breaking news. A huge victory for President Donald Trump and perhaps the Second Amendment… [More]
How is “perhaps” definitively asserted to be a “huge victory”?
It may turn out to be, but the claim is premature.
Attorney General Pam Bondi has announced that the DOJ does not believe that the McCoy vs ATF should be the next 2A SCOTUS case. Why did DOJ say this? Mark Smith, Four Boxes Diner, discusses [Watch]
I’m not afraid to say so when I think he’s not being objective considering all factors, or just generally playing see-no-evil administration cheerleader. That said, I think he’s correct here.
[Via Jess]
You know who ought to be taking the lead on all this, not just with arguments but with bearing the costs…?
“The Postal Service is currently analyzing the court’s decision and taking necessary steps to implement the injunction.” [More]
Yeah, I noticed the sign is still up.
Our Next Debate: Would America Be Safer Without the Second Amendment? [More]
There’s nothing to debate.
Remember what Mr. Paine said [link downloads Word doc]:
The balance of power is the scale of peace. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. And while a single nation refuses to lay them down, it is proper that all should keep them up. Horrid mischief would ensue were one-half the world deprived of the use of them; for while avarice and ambition have a place in the heart of man, the weak will become a prey to the strong. The history of every age and nation establishes these truths, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves.
That balance of power must exist between government and governed or tyranny will prevail.
The Second Amendment does not authorize predatory abuse of arms any more than the First authorizes libel, fraud, and perjury. Since the right to arms is a preexisting one, amending the Constitution would not eliminate, the right, just the government’s recognition of it, and try changing that and you ain’t seen nothin’ yet in terms of body counts.
Dershowitz is an impotent old fool, what Aaron Zelman called a “bagel brained Jew,” serving here in the role of ideological kapo.
Publix has confirmed it will allow customers to openly carry firearms inside its Florida stores, following a court ruling that struck down the state’s long-standing open carry ban. In a statement to 7News, a spokesperson for Publix said the grocery chain “follows all federal, state and local laws” and emphasized that “treating customers with dignity and respect is a founding belief.” [More]
Well, that ought p!$$ off the same people who endorse a Democrat who wants to shoot Republicans in the head.
They sure had no trouble gloating when they thought they were winning.
[Via Kid Sister]
Pelosi dodges when asked if Virginia AG candidate who fantasized about shooting Republican should drop out – Pelosi, who pressured Biden to bow out of 2024 race, says she doesn’t ‘get involved in other people’s races’ [More]
In other words, she’s joined the other grabbers in hiding.
What happened to “Don’t look away“?
What a cowardly and ridiculous hypocrite.
Democrats have given up any claim to lecture anyone– not that they ever had any in the first place. Every single one of them mugging with the red shirts should have this thrown in their faces.
[Watch]
To be clear, I thought those secret efforts where they “don’t like to get into details talking about who we’re working with and how we’re accomplishing it” had everything under control…
[Via Jess]
Equally unsurprising, but nonetheless very revealing, is that none of the so-called “gun safety groups” that have come out for Jones are rescinding their endorsements. [More]
Maybe the cat’s got their tongue… And why does it look like the Brady group is trying to quietly erase their endorsement…?
