The Other Women

NRA has done something good, so it won’t hurt us to recognize that. Spreading this video far and wide can help promote RKBA and challenge prohibitionist lies. That includes throwing it in the faces of gun-grabbing Democrats in reply to their idiotic social media posts.

It needs to be followed up with a strong “Now Stop Voting for Democrats!” message, because that needs to change not just anecdotally, but dramatically.

[Via Andy M]

Carrying on a Tradition

Three months ago the New Mexico governor announced a 30-day ban on citizens’ right to carry a concealed firearm in Albuquerque and the county that Albuquerque sits in. What did the Justice Department do when the governor did that unconstitutional order? What did the DOJ do in response to that unconstitutional action from the governor of New Mexico? [Watch]

The same thing they didn’t do two decades ago when we petitioned the Republicans for rights enforcement.

[Via Jess]

O What a Tangled Web They Weave

From an email discussion amongst the Ramsey. A. Bear Society, a “small cadre” that includes me in their discourse:

DeWilde v. Attorney General: Supplemental authority filed. Here, he says that he got his Form 1 approved for self-manufacturing an FGM-148 Javelin Anti-Tank Missile Launcher. He is doing so to prove that if he can get approval for the Javelin launcher, which is a more destructive portable arm (firearm, to be exact) than semi and full autos, then he should get approval for full autos.


Ahh. That is awesome. The gov argument is that he has no “right” to possess it under the 2A, not that he cannot legally possess it. So if the gov decides to ban it, there is no issue. That is what the gov argues.

We’re gonna need a bigger range…

A Tale Told by an Idiot, Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing

This week, I will put the Assault Weapons Ban on the Senate floor. [More]

What, is this Democrats whoring for headlines week…?

Question: Say the GOP blows ’24 or the election is stolen again, SCOTUS gets stacked, and this power pervert’s nocturnal emission comes true. Then say just 3% of us, and pray that’s all it is, reply “No, your move”…

Flesh out your plan, Schumer, you loathsome traitor. What needs to happen then, in detail, what will resistance to your bullshit tyranny look like, and you’re sure your enforcers are up for the response your hatred of men who believe unbendingly in the right to keep and bear arms will set off?

We will not disarm.

[Via Jess]

Just Like She Knows What She’s Talking About

Sen. Gillibrand said Monday that new federal gun legislation has allowed authorities to prosecute hundreds of gun traffickers. [More]

Is it out of line to ask what “allows” the legislation?

Here’s the tax-funded propaganda the “real reporter” parroted from. And here’s the “report,” which on first glance appears to unintentionally confirm John Lott’s conclusions that concentrated Democrat crime areas do not justify blanket citizen disarmament.

And is Kirsten ever going to show us the answers she gave NRA when she was lying to them for an endorsement?

[Via Jess]

Not Interested

Waiver of right of respondent Jay Robert Pritzker, et al. to respond filed. [More]

There’s some arrogance for ya. They figure they don’t have to answer for Illinois Supreme Court corruption. Let’s hope SCOTUS surprises them and decides to look into it.

I’m told there may be more action on this later in the week, and if so, will decide if I can address it here or if a longer article is needed.

[Via President Non_Fudd]

To All Intents and Purposes

The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen found that a central part of New York’s licensing process, requiring a special need to obtain a concealed-carry permit, violated the Second Amendment. Because of this, Rivera reasoned, New York can no longer presume that everyone who possesses an unlicensed firearm intends to use it illegally. [More]

The presumption ought to be that licenses are illegal.

[Via Jess]

Without Further Comment

Once the comment period has ended, the ATF will consider the public comments before deciding whether to adopt the rule, modify it, or drop it. [More]

Y’know, I was nodding along with you right until this last line. Does anyone seriously believe the decision wasn’t made before the required rule was posted for comment?

The only reason I submitted one was to show my solidarity with those making their refusal to bow down a matter of record. That’s why I urge you to come and stand with us, regardless of the coordinated Astroturf campaign.

I just wish I could believe the poor showing from “our side” is because most consider it a useless effort and believe Bruen will save us, instead of what “experience hath shown” to generally be the case.

[Via Dan Gifford]

Ball’s in Their Court

US Supreme Court justice Amy Coney Barrett just ordered the defendants in National Association for Gun Rights v. Naperville to explain why the court should not enjoin Illinois’s “assault weapon” ban law. [Watch]

And again with the Barden/Sandy Hook ad intro

[Via Jess]

Flagshafted

The city of Flagstaff, Ariz., banned all commercial advertising at the local airport after a gun-range owner threatened to sue the city for prohibiting his ad specifically from appearing on government property. [More]

The rights prohibitionists have no intention of stopping at the Second Amendement.

You tell me why a city with these demographics feels compelled to virtue signal this.

And this

If not cultual Marxism

[Via Jess]

Gaslighting for Headlines

Sens. Angus King (I-Maine) and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) introduced a bill Thursday to regulate firearms by outlawing weapons with a magazine capacity over 10 rounds, among other measures aimed at increasing gun control. The Gas-Operated Semi-Automatic Firearms Exclusion Act (GOSAFE) comes a month after a gunman killed 18 people in a mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine, not far from where King lives. [More]

F*** these Democrat traitors.

It’s not going anywhere.

And if it did, who worth a damn would comply?

[Via Jess]

Appeals Court Rules California Can Continue Doxing Gun Owners to Agenda ‘Researchers’

That “misuse” can be deliberate by activists gone wild or due to lax/incompetent security protocols. And it’s not like sensitive and supposedly secure government systems at the highest levels can’t be breached and hacked by anyone, from cyber criminals to foreign enemies. It’s not like names, addresses, and lists don’t have real-world street value, and it would be just like the prohibitionists to have their efforts actually increase violence and its incentives. [More]

Why do you need privacy if you’re not doing anything wrong?

Verified by MonsterInsights