Category: Second Amendment

Taking the 5th

Boston firefighter faces over 40 charges after failing to turn over firearms following a restraining order [More]

Of interest from the video:

He initially lied about having weapons, but his defense attorney explains those firearms weren’t registered. He hadn’t done them on time.

So if he’d complied with the order and produced the guns, that would have been self-incriminating.

Didn’t the Supreme Court already weigh in on that?

Anybody know who is his attorney is, and if he knows about this?

Ah, here we go.

All we can do is offer:

[Via Jess]

And So It Begins

Democrat Walkinshaw wins special congressional election where Trump loomed large – Democrat wins Virginia special election seat after voters ‘send a statement’ on Trump policies [More]

Ready to see that happen again and again?

Yeah, but it was a Democrat district.

Making excuses and doing nothing else will ensure more Democrat districts.

Without Coordination, Money and Boots on the Ground, Virginia Will Be Lost to the Gun Prohibitionists

Fusaro has offered a detailed plan, and good one. It’s up to NRA and VCDL to share what plans they have developed to see how their detailed strategies compare… [More]

What happens here will be a bellwether for the midterms. We’re either serious about this — and willing to do all the necessary things — or we’re not and we won’t.

A Small Price to Pay

Good, but will the state appeal? And when when are they going to suffer punitive damages?

Not that any of it comes out of the pockets of those responsible…

[Via Jess]

Got a Minute?

That’s how long it took me to take the White House up on it’s invitation and send it Executive Order idea requests to include gun owner representatives on the Second Amendment Task Force, end the ban on private arms at military bases, and order the Army Corps of Engineers to finalize and implement the rule to allow guns on lands it controls.

Literally less than a minute for each of these. Of course, the various options for communicating I’ve already included in my articles are also easily doable.

Funny thing is, all three articles have generated plenty of comments, mostly petty squabbling, but I’m having a hard time finding more than a handful saying “Yes, I have done this and urged my friends to do it, too.”

[Via Henry Bowman]

None Dare Call It Treason

The DC Court of Appeals today upheld the district’s under-21 gun ban, saying that “assum[ing] without deciding that eighteen-to-twenty-one-year-olds with no criminal history are part of ‘the people’ that the Second Amendment protects,” they do not have the right to purchase, possess, or carry guns [More]

At least we know where they think rights come from.

[Via Jess]

The Mark of Kaine

The prideful creation presuming itself to be the Creator seems to me to be how this whole mess started.

[Via Jess]

Tell Me Again How Ohio Has ‘Constitutional Carry’

Garrett’s attorney, state Rep. Josh Williams (R-Sylvania Twp.), says prosecutors are leaning on an Ohio law that bans drivers and passengers from having loaded firearms within reach inside a vehicle. But he argues another section of the law creates an exemption for concealed carry license holders. Garrett holds a lifetime license in Indiana. [More]

And duty to inform IF ASKED seems ripe for a Fifth Amendment challenge.

Yet the Republicans who allow this and aren’t pushing for change will be quick to brag about how they’re “staunch defenders of the Second Amendment” come election time.

[Via Jess]

Let There Be Lights

Just learned today of the sickening limits set by Contra Costa County (pop. 1.2m) for their CCW licensees. No Single Action only pistol allowed. Yes, implicates the 1911, 2011 etc. No Weapon lights allowed No Red Dots allowed No Lasers allowed No more than 2 weapons allowed [More]

I thought the limit was 3.

If anyone has credible links to confirm the claims, please share them in comments.

[Via Jess]

Charlie X*

Take the guns first, due process later?

And then trust people officially considered to dangerous to own a gun to walk unrestrained among the rest of us?

Speaking of lunatic, if “gun control” and designating “prohibited persons” work, explain Chicago.

Meanwhile, the Democrats, once they get back in power because Republicans keep doing and saying stupid $#!+ like this, are setting things in motion to declare being anti-trans a mental illness and create a self-admitted record of it. Tell me if they could get away with it they wouldn’t demand that to be a “Hate Crime Prohibitor.”

Gee, what do you know: Collectivism (and that’s what such a ban would be predicated on) is two-edged sword.

Rights belong to each of us as individuals. My position on this hasn’t changed.

As for Kirk, he’s a Vichycon fraud. One who knowingly sends Turning Point USA members into harm’s way without adequate precautions, which makes it fair to wonder if he thinks THEIR sacrifice will be worth it.

Where do we get these “conservative influencers” from?

WTF is Justice thinking?

And what kind of Opposite Day Bizarro World are we living in where CNN et al. are backhandedly arguing for the Second Amendment?

*

Related UPDATE

CCRKBA: DOJ SHOULDN’T BAN GUNS FOR TRANS PEOPLE OVER INDIVIDUAL CRIMES [More]

Yep. That it’s even being discussed by anyone in the administration once more makes my point for me.

Donald Trump Can Rein in Army Corps of Engineers on Guns

These lands belong to the people, and the people have the right to keep and bear arms. [More]

As Commander-in-Chief, this would be an easy and very popular fix with gun owners. Republicans facing midterms and “gun rights” groups take note how this would benefit you and get behind this now.

And Leave the Disarming to Us!

US appeals court reverses lower court, approves Illinois ban on carrying firearms on public transit [More]

No doubt when he commutes, Biden appointee Judge Joshua Kolar is “comfortably situated” in a private luxury vehicle and doesn’t need submit himself and his loved ones to this.

[Via Jess]

‘Very Good News’?

[T]he 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has found that machine guns are not protected under the Second Amendment with really a terribly reasoned ruling. But the outcome is the one we want because, as I’ve explained to you before, unequivocally, 100% we 1,000% do not want a machine gun case to go to the United States Supreme Court. Anyone that disagrees with me is 1,000% wrong. If a machine gun case goes to the Supreme Court, we will 1,000% lose, which will create more bad Second Amendment precedent. And it will also delay, as an opportunity cost the decision that AR-15s and semi-automatic rifles are protected arms under the Second Amendment… [Watch]

The fact that his legal read on this is correct should be all the proof we need that the court benches are dominated by traitors.

[Via Jess]

The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship?

Following its amicus brief in support of us, the federal government has asked the Seventh Circuit for approval to participate in oral arguments in our lawsuit challenging Illinois’ “assault weapon” and magazine bans [More]

How could they refuse? After all, “Currently, six of the court’s judges were appointed by Republicans and five by Democrats.”

Yeah, but one of those “Republicans” is treasonous dotard Frank Easterbrook…

[Via Jess]

Daily Defense

Go here to watch or listen live.

Verified by MonsterInsights