Category: self-defense

For the Children

Shotgun preteen vs. Illegal alien Home Invaders [More]

Reminds me of a post from almost 20 years ago, when a 12-year-old stopped armed robbers invading his grandmother’s store.

In all cases, then or now, self-righteous gun prohibitionists would rather the targeted victims had been killed than armed– preferably with guns, so they could dance in their blood and press for more bans, although they’d settle for pitchforks.

[Via WiscoDave]

UPDATE

Looks like the main link goes to a fake story.

That’ll teach me to ignore my own advice.

Outside Chance

Police said the homeowner was working on his property, which is not his primary residence when he was met with an intruder on the porch who was armed with a baseball bat and a knife. Police said the struggle moved from the porch down into the yard, where the homeowner pulled a gun and shot the other man. [More]

There’s an important reminder here for those who do yard work.

[Via bondmen]

Rapex 2.0

Instead of addressing the factors driving this violence—such as massive and uncontrolled immigration—the reaction is a grotesque distraction: proposing “trap condoms” with internal spikes designed to injure the attacker’s penis. [More]

It’s been done.

And it didn’t work then, either.

Maybe if they combined it with anti-rape electric underwear…

I guess it doesn’t occur to pro-invader/anti-gun “progressive” women that the very act of inserting one of these obscenities is an act of self-rape performed for the dominating pleasure of their masters.

This is what they would reduce us all to.

[Via Michael G]

Good Guy with a Gun

Security guard kills Michigan church gunman, preventing ‘large-scale mass shooting’: Police [More]

It’s nice the church took proactive steps to protect it’s “flock,” but most of them fit that description, dependent on someone else to save them. Sheepdogs are hardly what the Founders had in mind and I’ve never liked that analogy.

Note that not one “commonsense gun safety law” group would have preferred the congregants to be armed instead of being slaughtered like sheep, which would have given them gallons of fresh blood to dance in.

I wonder how soon it will be until Brian Browning appears over at the “Gun Violence Memorial“?

Related UPDATE

A thwarted blood dancer tries to hide his disappointment while demanding even more vulnerability. Give the guy credit, though: He’s managed to be both a foreign enemy AND a domestic enemy.

[Via WiscoDave]

An Age-Old Question

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners have filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging Connecticut’s ban on adults under the age of 21 from purchasing, owning or carrying handguns. [More]

Good– it makes a key undeniable point:

Over 200 colonial and Founding-era militia statutes throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries not only permitted, but affirmatively mandated that persons aged eighteen to twenty acquire and keep arms.

No 2A lawsuit should be without it.

Who Could Have Seen THAT Coming?

Accordingly, we hold that LCMs do not fit the constitutional definition of “arms” before even reaching whether they are “commonly used for self-defense.”However, LCMs also fall outside either protection of the right to bear arms because the provisions protect only those arms that are commonly used for selfdefense, and we have been presented with no credible and persuasive evidence or argument that LCMs are commonly used for such a purpose. [More]

Gee, who would ever think those arguments could be a trap?

Verified by MonsterInsights