A Ploy Named Sue

Uvalde families sue makers of AR-15, ‘Call of Duty,’ Meta over mass shooting [More]

I see they don’t like the First Amendment any more than they do the Second.

Why someone is attacking me becomes irrelevant when the immediate object is to stop him. Their grief does not legitimize their demand to send lethal force equipped enforcers after me to take my property and abridge my rights.

It’s a shame to see them exploited as useful idiot pawns by the cultural Marxists.

[Via Jess]

Common Cause

Let me also respond to your “in common use” argument. There is no “in common use” tradition. [More]

I agree:

The Second Amendment does not say “the right of the people to keep and bear arms in common use at the time shall not be infringed.” If it had, the Anti-Federalists would have told the Framers to go to hell.

Then there’s this:

Dangerous and Unusual? It’s a lie and does not exist. [More]

And again

Interesting reading that also links to “The Historical Tradition and Analogue Lie in Bruen“…

As for this charge, I’d need to see links, specifics and context. What citizen disarmament edicts has Mark W. Smith endorsed? My biggest disgreement with him — and other prominent 2A attorneys — so far has been when they say stuff like ATF doesn’t have the authority but Congress does. Huge deferring to stare decisis vs. “shall not be infringed” hole, that one, but even there that doesn’t mean he’d be for a ban, and for the most part I think he’s been among the best, especially with his insights into SCOTUS.

If Not a Pillar of Support at Least a Fifth Column…

Mad? Sad? Inspired? Fired up and ready to take action? You don’t need to wait for an organization to start a petition on an issue that’s important to you. Start your own petition right now. It will just take a few minutes, and we’ll be here to support you. [More]

If I had time, I might try to see what kind of “support” they’d give me for “Repeal the NFA,” or… ?

If anyone cares to try, let us know what happens.

Always Think Forfeiture

The latest high court action came in a 6-3 decision in Culley v. Marshall, where the justices held that there are “no due process protections for citizens in asset forfeiture proceedings to have an early court hearing to contest the government keeping possession of their seized property while they await trial.” [More]

“6-3″…? The Democrats voted right and the “pro-gun” judges voted wrong…?

What’s a government with an unlimited war chest stripping innocent-until-proven-guilty defendants of resources to defend themselves have to do with guns?

Ask the Reese family (and you’ll need to use the Wayback Machine to access my old Gun Rights Examiner links.)

I wonder if the majority got new Leathermans

Not Reading the Room

“If I wasn’t a libertarian I am now,” he said… He pledged to put a libertarian in his cabinet if he wins the election… [More]

As what? He realizes they demand open borders…?

Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders.

A few of them have dismissed my challenge outright, or tried to change the subject or talk around it by introducing new arguments that evade its points, but none have answered it.

Because they can’t and they know it.

And what’s with sharing the anarchy symbol adopted by Marxist Antifa?

It’s consistent with the sshole who shouted “Donald Trump should have taken a bullet!”not being publicly identified, thrown out of the convention, and expelled from the Party. Instead, the “boos and heckling” were reserved for Trump.

Face it: The ones who would vote for RFK will hurt Biden more.

Speaking or not reading a larger room, the ever-suicidal and irrelevant LP hierarchy instead nominated a true believer who is bound and determined to make it an even bigger clown show with his full-throated endorsement of “drag queen story hours.”

Military Cemetery Gun Bans an Affront to Patriots Who Died Fighting for Freedom

There is no valid reason the government can give that should supersede the rights of deceased veterans’ survivors, certainly nothing that would comply with the Bruen standard of history, text, and tradition at the time the Constitution was ratified. [More]

Kinda puts the lie to those Lee Greenwood lyrics…

Democrats Continue to Place Criminals Above Citizens, Exploiting That to Ban Guns

They rely on violent crime so that they have blood to dance in, to whip up mob furor among constituents ignorant and stupid enough to vote for them. [More]

Why punish their constituents when they can punish you?

‘Our Democracy’

There’s perhaps no statistic more shocking than the 69% of politically obsessed elites who think it would be better if only people with college degrees could vote. [More]

Adding new relevance to the question “What’s your major?…”

But that’s not ’til after, right?

So what do they tell the vet who enlisted after high school and came back a changed man?

[Via Michael G]

Proud Waves Your Banner in the Sky!

The sound of bullets pierced the air at what should have been a momentous occasion at Skyline High School’s graduation Thursday evening, sending students and their families running for cover up in Oakland’s hills. [More]

Nope, it’s nothing like this:

Hey, I find that mascot racist!

[Via Steve T]

Me, I’m Sending ‘Machine Gun Sammy’ a Threeper Flag!

Alito’s House Reportedly Flew ‘Appeal To Heaven’ Flag Used By Jan. 6 Rioters—Adding To Upside-Down Flag Controversy [More]

It’s a pretty one-sided controversy, “real reporter” Antonio Pequeño IV, when you only reference what sets Democrats off and omit the flag’s patriotic origin and history.

Just like making America great again, we dare not trigger those who worship at a different altar with appeals to Heaven.

Anybody remember when Steve Forbes tried to convince us he was our pal, and the NRA mouthpiece asked him about everything BUT the right to keep and bear arms?

[Via bondmen]

Verified by MonsterInsights