What If You Seized Power by Fraud and Nobody Minded?

The FBI Paid For Russian Disinformation To Frame Trump—And 7 Other Takeaways From Durham’s Latest Court Filing [More]

Funny. Not a word about this on CNN

That average Democrat voters don’t know and don’t care and won’t be persuaded to vote against those ordering and encouraging this pretty much tells us what we can expect.

Try it yourself. Tell one and see if their response isn’t one of subject-changing and counter-accusation.

[Via bondmen]

Et Tu, Truth Social?

Before:

After:

Does anybody see anything particularly “sensitive” about a painting that hangs in the National Army Museum and illustrates the core reason behind “our beautiful Second Amendment”?

Yo, Donald Trump: Your platform was supposed to be different. (As was your presidency until you started up with bump stocks and “take the guns first/due process later.”)

Will sucking up for the Google Play app mean it’s not?

From the Department of Retroactive Crime

“The current president should not be able to waive the executive privilege of a predecessor, without the consent of the former president. Otherwise, [privilege] means nothing. What president will ever discuss anything in private if he knows the man who beat him can and will disclose it.” [More]

Like Precrime, only with hindsight!

[Via Michael G]

A Real Red Flag

“Governor Hochul made the announcement in Suffolk County where the County Sheriff’s Office is reporting a more than 75 percent increase in utilization of the Red Flag Law over the last three months.” [More]

And, of course, they’ll be prepared to handle the increased caseload to preclude drawn-out delays with rights denied…? I wonder if anyone will be keeping track of people caught up in the net being victimized…

Take the guns first, due process second,” Mr. President?

[Via Jess]

Straight from the Sources’ Mouths?

DEVELOPING: Sources say the FBI agents and officials who were involved in the raid on former President Trump’s home work in the same CounterIntelligence Division of the FBI that investigated Trump in the Russiagate hoax and are actively under criminal investigation by Special Counsel John Durham for potentially abusing their power investigating Trump in the Russian fraud and therefore have a potential conflict of interest and should have been RECUSED from participating in this supposed “espionage” investigation at Mar-a-Lago. [More]

“Sources”?

Then again, sometimes that’s all you can go with at the start of an exposé.

I tried to find more on this before posting to see what kind of evidence Paul Sperry has, but I don’t see anything on his landing page yet and  Twitter has seen fit to “suspend” his account.

Unlike what they do with jihadists who make online threats.

[Via Keith B]

UPDATES

Tangentially-Related UPDATE

It’s foot-dragging reminiscent of the feds’ hunt for Whitey Bulger, the serial-killing brother of the most powerful Democrat politician in the state. [More]

Hey, go with what you know works…

[Via Michael G]

Playing for the Cameras?

“Mark my words here: There will be a moment when President Trump is giving one of his big speeches somewhere and the FBI will storm the stage,” Starnes said. “They will arrest the president on national television and drag him away. That’s how all of this will end up.” [More]

Be funny if someone forgets to order the Secret Service detail to stand down…

[Via bondmen]

Verified by MonsterInsights