Surprise, Surprise, Surprise

“Here, the district court concluded that ‘the federal government has both a dominant interest and a pervasive regulatory framework’ to control immigration into the United States, ‘preclud[ing] state regulation in the area,’” wrote Chief Judge Priscilla Richman. [More]

Nominated by President George W. Bush

[Via Michael G]

Related UPDATE

States copy Texas after Supreme Court permits local police to arrest and deport illegal immigrants [More]

Now I’m confused.

Beating Around the Bush

Why former President George W. Bush is winning… the post-presidency – At a time when faith in government is exceedingly low, Bush has re-earned the public’s respect [More]

Ri-ight…

Spoken like the globalist Swamp apologist desperate to torpedo MAGA that you are, Jared Cohen.

Faux News certainly is reflecting its NepoMurdoch management these days

Bush AG Gonzales’ Proves Authoritarian Swamp Republicans No Different From Democrats

Gonzales showed what kind of Republican he was back in 2005 when he told the Senate he wanted them to remove Patriot Act restrictions and that he supported Congress extending the expired “assault weapon” ban, pointing out that his brother was a Houston SWAT officer… [More]

It must be a “good” boot to the face if it has an “R” on it. Right…?

It’s a Big 俱乐部 and You Aint In It

The Supreme Court also struck down a New York state law that had been in place since 1913 restricting people from carrying concealed firearms. As the nation reflects on gun violence, such a reckless reversal of New York’s gun control law is intolerable, noted the governor of New York. American political commentator Matthew Dowd pointed out that the problems facing the United States today are rooted in the fragmentation of democracy. What American citizens want are a fair ruling in Roe v. Wade, a real gun reform, higher minimum wages, steeper taxes on the super-rich, better health care for all, and other reforms that heed popular calls. [More]

So the Bush/Cheney chief campaign strategist is basically speaking for the Chicoms on “gun control”…

[Via WiscoDave]

Brace Yourselves

For the reasons discussed, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief or, in the alternative, for postponement of the Final Rule’s effective date (ECF No. 33). [More]

So infringements by swarms of officers are constitutional now…?

Oh, look! He was nominated by the Vote Freedom First President!

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights