The Old One-Two

Here’s the jab:

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield is suing the Trump administration over cuts to SNAP benefits for noncitizens and its intensified anti-fraud measures.

Here’s the punch:

Oregon’s Democrat Attorney General Threatens to ARREST Federal Agents for Enforcing Immigration Law and Protecting Portland ICE Facility

Civil wars start this way.

[Via bondmen]

Speaking of Spectrum Disorder

The family says the district explained that a pair of staff members’ spouses had the same sort of khaki colored patriotic lunch bag, and those spouses stored guns in them. They therefore worried the autistic student might be doing the same. [More]

These are who Democrats have teaching children? Those people would have had autistic meltdowns over some of my old lunchboxes.

[Via Steve T]

The Cognitive Dissonance…It Burns…

Point:

“You know due process is a – it sounds very scholarly but it’s basically what prevents the government from sweeping you, or me, off the street,” Merkley said when asked his thoughts on Democrats’ defense of Abrego Garcia. “[Due process] is extraordinarily important for freedom.”

Counterpoint:

I am incredibly grateful for the courage my colleagues in the House of Representatives showed… today, they passed a bill creating a nationwide red flag law.

Don’t look for anyone dumb enough to vote for this traitor to see the contradiction.

You Can’t Have One Without the Other

To my fellow Oregonskis, you are outnumbered and your only hope, just like the blacks of the 20th Century lies in federal intervention. And federal intervention it must be. We await a newly invigorated Civil Rights Division of a purged US Department of Justice to get busy. [More]

Which will never happen unless “gun rights groups” stop kissing administration @$$ and start leading their millions of member in demanding it.

I also received this comment via X message:

Howdy. I appreciate your efforts and work! Thought I’d send this privately rather than comment under the article. This is an incorrect take. The Oregon appeals court’s ruling was based on the state constitution as the lower court judge (Raschio) made it clear his decision (pro gun rights) was based on the Oregon constitution (which was an important distinction based on the Federal court decision discussed next). It was the Federal court judge (Trump appointee Immergut) who heard the 2A arguments on measure 114 almost 20+ months ago and attempted to narrow 2A rights with her pro measure 114 100+ page opinion. Raschio’s ruling merely gave us Oregon gun owners a 20 month reprieve (during which time the US Supreme Court should have addressed the issue via Snope and others, but has failed to do so). My $0.02 anyway… Take care & I hope this didn’t come across rude or arrogant, as it was not my intention.

While I don’t recall going into those details to make it an “incorrect take,” it’s not arrogant or rude: I appreciate the background insights.

Oregon Court Decision Sides Against Second Amendment and with Tyranny

If it were other civil rights being violated by a state, precedent has already been established that the U.S. Department of Justice would step in and put a stop to it. Gun owners should demand the same for the Second Amendment from an administration that literally owes its electoral victory to them, and our “gun rights leaders” should be the loudest voices making sure it can’t be ignored. [More]

Yo, AG Bondi: A little help here? Or will your DOJ continue being selective about which rights it will protect?

Ken Boddie, ‘Real Reporter’

Ghost guns — that is 3D-printed guns, guns with no serial numbers, guns that can’t be detected by X-rays and guns built at home using separately purchased parts — are now banned on Oregon streets. [More]

An Emmy Award-winning one at that! And people vote based on this.

This seems appropriate.

CBS KOIN 6: News You Can Wipe With!

[Via Michael G]

We’re the Only Ones Graceful Enough

FBI to grant Oregon a ‘grace period’ to allow access for Measure 114′s required federal background checks [More]

So ignore what the law says to accomplish a “greater” purpose?

Do they have the statutory authority to grant themselves that seemingly legislative power?

Does the Republican-majority House have any funding say in this?

Related UPDATE

Oregon Firearms Federation weighs in.

We Don’t Need No Education

Oregon again says students don’t need to prove mastery of reading, writing or math to graduate, citing harm to students of color [More]

That’s one way to make excuses for the subversive scam of teachers’ unions, where incompetence is a feature, not a bug. Create chaos and dependency through indoctrination and ignorance, and add in importing pathway-to-citizenship foreign nationals whose countries can somehow churn out employees with superior technical abilities on a pittance of what we spend per capita on students, and you have all the ingredients for control — of all kinds.

Not that our “single-issue gun rights leaders” dare notice…

[Via WiscoDave]

Received Via Email

Great article! Yeah, it’s pretty funny that our great anti-gun president has a son who lied on his 4473 to get a gun(s).

Speaking of courts, Oregon hardly get press coverage of the what’s taking place in courts here, specifically the fight over Measure 114. I guess we’re regarded as a hopeless cause while coverage of cases in California, Massachusetts, NJ, NY which involve the same issues are always covered in Ammoland. Hmm

Thanks.

In re Oregon, I publish links to every alert Kevin Starrett and OFF put out and more on WoG:

https://waronguns.com/?s=Oregon

I have for years:

https://waronguns.blogspot.com/search?q=Oregon

I also do AmmoLand articles:

So does AmmoLand in general:

Our biggest problem is getting the word out — search engines and social media suppress us, and most readers don’t share links, so it’s easy to see how our stuff is missed– but it’s not because we’re ignoring it. We’re doing everything we can to juggle all the balls and drop as few as we can with the resources we have.

Verified by MonsterInsights