Giffords Gun Control Group: Palisades Fire Should Make GOP Back Off on Defunding ATF [More]
Yeah, who else will follow up on Democrat-created problems after the damage has been done?
[Via bondmen]
Notes from the Resistance
The bill would allow the import of firearms when similar products are domestically produced and available for sale in the United States. [More]
I wonder if he reads Firearms News. The thing is, it doesn’t need to be a bill, which would allow for it to fail. :
There’s something else Trump could do quickly that would not require Congressional approval. Back in 1989, George H.W. Bush (the “Read my lips, no new gun laws” president who quit the NRA over its then-Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre repeating Democrat Rep. John Dingell’s “jackbooted thugs” reference to ATF) imposed “a permanent import ban on 43 types of semiautomatic assault rifles, including the Chinese-made AK47 and Israeli-made Uzi carbine,” per The Washington Post. The excuse given was they “were not being used for sport as required by the Gun Control Act of 1968.”
That would be “very easy” to overturn, Firearms News Editor-in Chief, Vincent L. DeNiro, who has a nine-page resume in the gun industry going back to 1982, assesses. “President Trump doesn’t even need Congress to get rid of the unconstitutional 1989 “assault weapons” import ban, he just needs to order the BATFE to declare all imported semi-auto rifles as ‘sporting,’ which is what these same models are considered when domestically produced.” (True, “sporting use” is a term originated in a 1938 German gun control law, and “swords and every terrible implement of the soldier are the birthright of an American,” but it will get the job done and we know why we want them.)
[Via bondmen]
SIG SAUER Recalls ROMEO5 Red Dot Firearm Sights Due to Ingestion Hazard; Violations of Reese’s Law Federal Safety Regulations for Consumer Products with Button Cell Batteries and Child Resistant Button Cell Battery Packaging [More]
Here’s the takeaway:
Incidents/Injuries:
None reported
So unlected, embedded, probable Democrat bureaucrats get to impose an expensive “F*** you” over a non-existent problem, unless you’re in the habit of leaving your guns so equipped in reach of toddlers…
You gotta wonder if they invented this on their own or if the antis have figured out how they can snitch and stick it to gun companies with rulefare.
What was that about teddy bears again…?
I’m wondering if a FOIA request might shed some light, and who would be the best person/entity to file one… I’m also wondering if this type of destructive overreach is something the new administraiton can address.
Too bad Gun Owners for Trump isn’t an actual thing…
[Via Jess]
Medicaid funding for gun violence programs faces scrutiny – Republican Congressman Andrew Clyde, of Georgia, unveiled the Medicaid Funds Integrity Act to restrict Medicaid funds for gun violence prevention programs. [More]
As usual, the “real reporters” are parroting lies to us. The point is to stop using tax dollars to spread violence monopolist propaganda, just like CDC was doing when its Director of the National Center for Injury Control and Prevention publicly advocated “We need to revolutionize the way we look at guns, like what we did with cigarettes. Now it [sic] is dirty, deadly, and banned.”
[Via Jess]
Democrat Coalition Propels Dustin Burrows to Speaker of the Texas House – More Democrats than Republicans voted for Burrows’ speakership. [More]
We’ve crossed paths with this character before.
There are always reasons for these things:
Dustin Burrows’s anti-gun record explained
[Via Sweet Babboo]
Gov. Evers creates new violence-prevention office in wake of school shooting [More]
Guaranteed not to prevent one instance of violence because it will be comprised entirely of people who oppose the only proven deterrent…
It’s revealing, how he lies and says citizen disarmament that will bolster a violence monopoly, a blatantly political move, should “transcend politics.”
That and “Violence is a statewide problem” without telling us how many WI communities has zero murders…
Ah well, his blood dance got him publicity with stupid Democrat voters who believe he’s “doing something,” which is what this is all about.
[Via Mike F]
Have you been fooled..? … John Fetterman remains as committed as ever to gutting the Second Amendment. [More]
No, I haven’t been.
About any Democrat “converts”…
“What are you going to do about it, President Trump?” [More]
First, we neeed to realistically look at what he CAN do. Then we need to realistically look at what he WILL do and use every means at our disposal to get his ear and try to keep him on course.
Everytown Still Counting Non-School Shootings as School Shootings [More]
Why not? It’s the same group that counted Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev as a “victim of gun violence.”
[Via bondmen]
Animals fleeing the California fires are seeking refuge in residential areas, having been displaced from their natural habitats in the mountains and hills. [More]
Then thank goodness for Giffords “trailblazers”!
[Via Edmund M]
Tangentially-Related UPDATE
Those aren’t the only predators.
Seems as plausible an explanation as any…
[Via WiscoDave]
The public college in a deep-red state that blows $13M on DEI and fighting ‘whiteness’ [More]
Now tell us how much they’ve spent on the John Glenn Second Amendment Research Center, headed until recently by Saul Cornell, or as I call him, the Slippin’ Jimmy of the revisionist history movement.
[Via Michael G]
Multiple Republicans voted for gun confiscations without due process in HB-4144 [More]
Until gun owners let the GOP know they cannot betray us and win, this will continue. They need uncompromising gun owners more than uncompromising gun owners need them.
So does that mean I’d rather let a really, really anti-gun Democrat win the seat instead?
Does that mean you’d surrender your guns if they did?
I believe in asking political candidates and nominees specific questions that demand unequivocal answers… [More]
Or they could just give her a pass for “I believe in the Second Amendment BUT…”
House Bill 12 by Rep. Joy Garratt (D-ABQ) allows law enforcement officers to bypass the need for a “reporting party” and go straight to filing a petition for an extreme risk protective order based on information collected by the officers — allowing them to be the sole source and mechanism by which an order is issued. [More]
And there’s another that makes owning attachments a felony.
Obey or be destroyed.
SB25-003, Colorado’s newly filed “Assault Weapons” Semi-Auto Firearm bill will ban all rifles and shotguns that accept detachable magazines, along with many semi-auto pistols that accept detachable magazines. If enacted, the Colorado Attorney General would have the power and authority to further define the nuanced and often contradictory bill language. [More]
They’re just trying to help their goals along.
[Via cydl]
New Concealed Carry Law Takes Effect July 1 – Plus a Lib Bonus: Vehicle Weapons Now Must Be Locked Up [More]
I don’t suppose being forced to take an eight-hour course and pass a written exam to vote is in the cards…
Coloradans take note. You’ll find no more staunch defender of all rights from government abuses than Mr. Gramlich & Co.
You can subscribe for hard copy or online editions. It sure beats the DSM.
The opening days of the legislative session start on Monday. We cannot sugarcoat it. This is going to be ugly. [More]
Thanks in no small part to Republicans without principle or courage…
Though they are significantly less powerful than real firearms, non-powder guns such as BB or air guns can be deadly, and should be regulated as such. [More]
They’d rather 10-year-old me had been mauled and eaten by jube dogs.
[Via Jess]
A New Jersey attorney who was denied a gun permit is suing Springfield Township and its police department in federal district court, alleging they violated his right to bear arms because of pro-Palestinian social media posts…. In records that Saadeh obtained through the state Open Public Records Act, police wrote that granting the permit renewal “would not be in the interest of the public health, safety or welfare because the person is found to be lacking the essential character of temperament necessary to be entrusted with a firearm.” [More]
Don’t stop there. Sue them for libel.
And no, I’ve changed no positions. I’m only going on facts presented and extrapolating from there while channeling my inner Thomas More.
[Via Jess]
When gun owners apply for concealed carry permits in Mecklenburg County, sheriff’s office background checks have sometimes turned up sensitive health information, including whether a person has had an abortion or has a sexually transmitted disease… The sheriff’s office, through a spokesperson, said the agency has no control over what information health providers choose to send. In a statement, MCSO said the records sent are dependent on the provider’s discretion. [More]
They can’t specify the information they want? And the providers don’t have policies and procedures in place approved by their risk managment departments to only provide what is required by law?
And why the hell is this required by law anyway?
[Via Jess]
ATF Says ALL Braced Pistols Are SBRs, In Violation Of The Law [Watch]
That’s one more bit of housekeeping. I wonder if whoever wrote the response is close to retirement and just doesn’t care.
The U.S. Supreme Court has distributed a third Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) case, B&L Productions v. Newsom, for conference on Friday, Jan. 24. The case challenges California’s statutes which ban gun shows on state-owned property. Because the gun shows at issue are not only opportunities to view and purchase firearms, but also for like-minded individuals to assemble and share ideas, the case presents questions about both the First and Second Amendments. [More]
Having followed this issue for many years, I say apathetic gun show attendees own their share of the mess they’ve allowed. They’re no doubt part of the majority that don’t contribute to efforts like this to clean up that mess.
Based on the record and arguments in this case. the right to keep and bear arms enshrined in the Second Amendment would require this Court—as counseled by the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment decisions—to declare the parks issue in Plaintiffs’ favor.’ But… [More]
A small concession aside, the “but” is all you need to know.
That and he’s one of those Trump judges we’ve been led to believe would turn things around.
[Via Jess]