Category: citizen disarmament

False Alternative

Opinion: I’m a lifelong gun owner. Don’t tell me more guns and less mental health resources will save our children. [More]

I believe in the Second Amendment BUT… Where have we heard that before?

Who’s saying dangerous crazy people can be trusted with guns?

Is it fair to wonder if this pediatrician gave clot shots to infants?

Closed-Minded

openmindedseptic

Folks who advocate for legalized guns never seen to take into account the effect that guns have ion others who are not using, like children who are dependents. They never calculate the cost to families, or even the public. The cost of homeless, much of which is due to addiction to guns, imposes a cost not just on users, but on everyone else. Cost of healthcare, housing, crimes committed, etc., due to guns, affect society, not just users. [More]

You convinced me! Where do I turn ’em in?

Penn/Swalwell Movie Flap Raises Questions of Consistency, Integrity, and Loyalty

“‘Workers of the world unite’ — unless it affects our bottom line?” [More]

Do union members labor under the illusion that career leftists are interested in championing them? What about gun owning union members?

And Leave the Driving to Us!

San Francisco power outage puts 130,000 in the dark, as self-driving car service stops vehicles in the street [More]

I don’t suppose you have control over the neighborhood where that could happen, do you?

Good thing Waymo says in no uncertain terms, “Do not bring weapons into the car.” Wouldn’t want any passersby taking advantage of unarmed customer!

I mean, it’s not like seeing one of your cars once word gets out will give predators added incentive…

Albo Room

And his victims are paying for it.

Hey, gotta protect him from honest opinions:

See why they need citizen disarmament?

[Via Michael G]

Oh, Look: A Professional Liar

Arming teachers does nothing to protect our children from gun violence. Data shows these reactive initiatives are ineffective, make students and staff feel less safe, and only bring new risks into schools. Despite this, a staggering 15 states have laws on the books that explicitly authorize arming teachers. [More]

And which schools where teachers are armed have experienced mass shootings or any of the dire consequences being warned against?

This is just like when concealed carry was starting to become a thing, and we heard hysterical bleating against Dodge City/Wild West/Blood in the streets over fender benders that never materialized.

These un-American liars would rather see you and yours savagely murdered than armed, and would prefer it if your assailant used a gun so they can dance in the blood and demand more defenselessness.

The Blame Game

We navigate public spaces with a quiet, practiced vigilance, aware that in America guns have become the leading cause of death for children and teens, especially Black and Brown youth. [More]

Because racism.

And not enough wealth transfer.

And nothing to do with choices.

There’s some industrial strength finger-pointing and denial baked into this collectivist’s rant. Good grief, some of the people put forth as leaders…

Rational people can’t deal with this and shouldn’t be expected to. We can feel sympathy for the delusional, but must be ready to repel them the second they become dangerous.

Do You Come from a Land Down Under

Albanese announces gun buyback scheme as NSW moves on gun limits, protest bans – Anthony Albanese said he expects “hundreds of thousands” of guns to be collected and destroyed through the scheme. [More]

That makes him a schemer.

Hey, I figured out who Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett reminds me of.

An Inconvenient Truth

You cannot meaningfully reduce the number of guns in the United States without building a system capable of finding them, compelling disclosure, and forcibly removing them when people decline to cooperate. [More]

And yes:

We believe gun-control advocates – or their leadership anyway – consider the deeply totalitarian implications she draws out to be not a bug but a feature. We think they want to shape the kind of society in which the kind of total. smothering force she describes can be exerted, much more than they want to “reduce gun violence” or any of the other goals they talk about.

It’s not about guns. It’s about freedom.

And having history to show us what totalitarians are capable of, it’s existential.

Like Dr. Banner said…

[Via Michael G]

A ‘Proven Conservative’

GOP Candidate Amy Fennell Wanted to Keep ‘Treasonous Felon’ Trump Out of White House – A series of recent social media posts from Fennell show the Republican candidate blasting Trump while supporting Kamala Harris. [More]

Nope, nothing about RKBA…

Not surprising if she wanted to help enable Kamala to do this…

[Via Sweet Babboo]

‘AND TO KEEP AND CARRY ARMS WHEREVER THEY WENT’

This is a heck of a case. Watch this, because he does a good job explaining Gardner v Maryland, where a traveler forced to defend herself got hosed by Maryland violence monopolists..

I want to know why my A-rated Republican Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost did not join in with the other state AGs, and why my two A-rated Republican Senators, John Husted and Bernie Moreno, didn’t join in with Ted Cruz and all those other senators. I think I’ll ask them.

Also, in the briefs I’ve seen so far, there’s one case that’s not cited, and not being a lawyer that seems more than curious to me as it has direct bearing because it was decided by the Supreme Court.

In the infamous Dred Scott decision, SCOTUS made one admission that showed what the court’s thinking was on this exact issue when it rationalized:

“It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, AND TO KEEP AND CARRY ARMS WHEREVER THEY WENT. [Emphasis added]

Educate a poor non-mouthpiece layman here who holds the simple notion that “shall not be infringed” means what it says and is jaded enough to believe the gun-grabbers understand that, too. Why isn’t anyone bringing up a part of Scott v Sandford that would survive where the rest of the decision would fall?

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights