Category: citizen disarmament

Who Needs Foreign Troops When You Have Foreign Voters?

Democrats in the Rhode Island General Assembly have introduced legislation that, if passed, would grant localities the ability to give non-U.S. citizens the right to vote in municipal elections. The measure marks the latest attempt by leftists to give foreigners and, in this case, even illegal immigrants the opportunity to influence the U.S. electoral process. [More]

Just like another place that works just fine.

That means if a municipality votes for citizen disarmament, the invaders have a say. Sure, Rhode Island ostensibly has limited preemption, but use and discharge control by cities means good luck with either, and Democrat control can change that.

And the traitors are Representatives:

Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue”, right?

Any “gun rights leader” who tells you that is just being politically gutless — or worse — and what’s more, he knows it.

[Via Michael G]

Attempts to Exploit MSU Shootings Run into Inconvenient Truths

Besides, a “gunman” (note the implied pejorative – “Scumbag Murderer” is much more apt) intent on slaughtering human beings is not likely to be deterred by “gun laws,” and this one was no exception. [More]

The killer may not help advance their narrative as much as the gun-grabbers were hoping for.

An Idea Whose Time Has Come?

A Bill That Would Require Legislators to Know What the Hell They Are Talking About [Watch]

Nah. I see two basic problems:

I don’t want an ignorant enemy to know what they’re talking about because then they’ll be in a better position to anticipate a bill’s vulnerabilities and make it more bulletproof.

Besides, those pulling their strings know exactly what they’re talking about, and that citizen disarmament is not about guns, it’s about control.

[Via Jess]

It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Humiliating’ Is

The move, however, leaves Bill C-21 otherwise intact, and as professor Gary Mauser of Simon Fraser University points out, the bill still bans over a million legally-owned handguns. It also doesn’t prevent the government from reintroducing similar legislation. [More]

As long as they think of it in terms of sport, hunting, and being “law-abiding,” and keep avoiding acknowledging it is an existential right necessary to deter tyrants, the final humiliation will be on the disarmed.

[Via Jess]

The Incompetent Kleptocrat Getting Free Publicity Act of 2023

For this reason, I will be introducing the Safer Neighborhoods Gun Buyback Act of 2023… [Watch]

If at first you don’t succeed, right, genius?

Democrat constituents do it to themselves– and not just politically.

The object is to not let them do it to the rest of us.

[Via Jess]

‘There Can Be Only One’

“High-capacity magazines were designed for one purpose and one purpose only — high-capacity killing — and have been used in some of the deadliest mass shootings in America,” Menendez said in a statement. [More]

Is that why you oath-breaking scumbag treasonous, tyrannical POS Democrats demand your trigger-happy enforcers be the “Only Ones” having them?

Measure 114 Lawsuit News

At the moment, gun owners are somewhat protected by the State Judge’s injunction though thousands are still being denied their rights due to the inaction of the Oregon State Police. However, the Oregon Department of Justice, and its militantly anti-gun Attorney General have made it quite clear that they will do all they can to force the implementation of Mz 114 and its unconstitutional and extreme restrictions on civil rights. [More]

The intent is to disarm citizens. And they won’t stop until they’re stopped.

Worried Sickos

Latest Supreme Court-related ruling overturning gun regulations worries domestic violence survivor advocates [More]

Yeah, well their demands to throw due process out the window and eviscerate the rights of those inclined to obey disarmament edicts without due process is the more worrisome prospect.

[Via Jess]

Exactly the Model

Yes: Tobacco. The tobacco industry is exactly the model that I think of in terms of the decades of work that it will take to address this issue.” [More]

You know, “dirty, deadly, and banned.”

But no one is talking about taking your guns.

As an aside, “journalist” Rita Braver, with her practiced “empathy,” is obviously performing for the camera. I wonder how many viewers realized that was to manipulate their emotions while they were being presented with only one side and the wrong side at that.

What can I say but “CBS“?

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights