Category: citizen disarmament

Woke Castle

White Castle has integrated Be SMART resources into their employee Wellness Resource Guide and will be having in-person Be SMART events in the areas they serve that are hardest hit by gun violence. White Castle’s headquarters are in Columbus, OH. [More]

Openly partnering with Everytown rights swindlers is enough to keep me away, not that I’d eat the cheap slimers they’ve been clogging America’s arteries with for decades anyway…

And my liberal sensibilities are outraged by who such greedy corporations disproportionately target and discriminate against!

I guess they think this is like buying indulgences for “destroying the planet & devastating entire communities.” They must believe Polyphemus when he says he’s going to eat them last.

[Via Andy M]

A Small Price to Pay

Good, but will the state appeal? And when when are they going to suffer punitive damages?

Not that any of it comes out of the pockets of those responsible…

[Via Jess]

There Oughta Be a Law

A “career criminal” is facing federal charges in Minnesota after he allegedly went on an armed carjacking spree Thursday morning that ended when he slammed a vehicle into another car. Prosecutors said the crash killed two women in their twenties and seriously injured a 6-year-old boy. [More]

45 and still pulling this $#!+… in spite of those prior restraints on you and me.

Those who kept letting him go share culpability.

Tangentially Related:

Decarlos Brown Jr. says “Hold my malt liquor.”

The Non-Psychic FFL Loophole

Gun store owner says shooter who killed 2 schoolchildren showed no warning signs before attack… Westman had already passed the required background checks and had a valid permit to purchase the gun… [More]

So, if prior restraints thrown up by all the king’s horses and all the king’s men couldn’t stop him, what’s the point of saying the store guy didn’t catch any disqualifiers?

Ah, the old “You’re law-abiding until you’re not” argument the grabbers apply to all of us… And that gun manufacturers and dealers “knew or should have known”…

Two words: Associated Press.

Ohio County Fair ‘No Guns’ Signs Are Unacceptable Insults to Armed Patrons

Although the board of the Canfield Fair were forced by law to allow carrying of firearms in open areas, they saturated “No Guns” signs on almost every building. [More]

Their motto is “Something to crow about!” What they’re crowing is, “In your faces, gun owners!”

None Dare Call It Treason

The DC Court of Appeals today upheld the district’s under-21 gun ban, saying that “assum[ing] without deciding that eighteen-to-twenty-one-year-olds with no criminal history are part of ‘the people’ that the Second Amendment protects,” they do not have the right to purchase, possess, or carry guns [More]

At least we know where they think rights come from.

[Via Jess]

Tell Me Again How Ohio Has ‘Constitutional Carry’

Garrett’s attorney, state Rep. Josh Williams (R-Sylvania Twp.), says prosecutors are leaning on an Ohio law that bans drivers and passengers from having loaded firearms within reach inside a vehicle. But he argues another section of the law creates an exemption for concealed carry license holders. Garrett holds a lifetime license in Indiana. [More]

And duty to inform IF ASKED seems ripe for a Fifth Amendment challenge.

Yet the Republicans who allow this and aren’t pushing for change will be quick to brag about how they’re “staunch defenders of the Second Amendment” come election time.

[Via Jess]

Let There Be Lights

Just learned today of the sickening limits set by Contra Costa County (pop. 1.2m) for their CCW licensees. No Single Action only pistol allowed. Yes, implicates the 1911, 2011 etc. No Weapon lights allowed No Red Dots allowed No Lasers allowed No more than 2 weapons allowed [More]

I thought the limit was 3.

If anyone has credible links to confirm the claims, please share them in comments.

[Via Jess]

Charlie X*

Take the guns first, due process later?

And then trust people officially considered to dangerous to own a gun to walk unrestrained among the rest of us?

Speaking of lunatic, if “gun control” and designating “prohibited persons” work, explain Chicago.

Meanwhile, the Democrats, once they get back in power because Republicans keep doing and saying stupid $#!+ like this, are setting things in motion to declare being anti-trans a mental illness and create a self-admitted record of it. Tell me if they could get away with it they wouldn’t demand that to be a “Hate Crime Prohibitor.”

Gee, what do you know: Collectivism (and that’s what such a ban would be predicated on) is two-edged sword.

Rights belong to each of us as individuals. My position on this hasn’t changed.

As for Kirk, he’s a Vichycon fraud. One who knowingly sends Turning Point USA members into harm’s way without adequate precautions, which makes it fair to wonder if he thinks THEIR sacrifice will be worth it.

Where do we get these “conservative influencers” from?

WTF is Justice thinking?

And what kind of Opposite Day Bizarro World are we living in where CNN et al. are backhandedly arguing for the Second Amendment?

*

Related UPDATE

CCRKBA: DOJ SHOULDN’T BAN GUNS FOR TRANS PEOPLE OVER INDIVIDUAL CRIMES [More]

Yep. That it’s even being discussed by anyone in the administration once more makes my point for me.

Donald Trump Can Rein in Army Corps of Engineers on Guns

These lands belong to the people, and the people have the right to keep and bear arms. [More]

As Commander-in-Chief, this would be an easy and very popular fix with gun owners. Republicans facing midterms and “gun rights” groups take note how this would benefit you and get behind this now.

Lather, Rinse, Repeat

Democratic lawmakers propose campus gun ban to improve safety at Wisconsin colleges [More]

Because nothing says “No Predators Allowed” like Gun-Free Zones!

I don’t suppose Wisconsin Democrats would also require these and have the Party indemnify schools found liable to pay out?

I guess we could ask Kelda…

[Via Mike F]

Give ’em What They Want

And if what they want is you…?

At first I thought I’d posted on this already, but when I checked saw that was just a parroted talking point.

[Via WiscoDave]

We’re the Only Ones Self-Serving Enough

An officer should respect your right to legally carry — but what happens when he gets antsy and gets aggressive with you? In that moment, your heart’s racing, your hands are frozen, and you’re trying to decide if telling him you’re armed will calm him down or make things worse. [Watch]

Yeah, why don’t you consider his feelings for a change?

Right, George?

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights