Notes from the Resistance
Christie says Trump’s ‘intolerant language and conduct’ contribute to rise in antisemitism [More]
That sounds like something “a closet antisemite” would say…
It’s not Trump agenda supporters out to make them — and everyone else — more vulnerable. And he doesn’t think “dangerous… crazy [and] radical” sounds intolerant?
Boy, the DSM sure is playing it up with everything they’ve got, though…
[Via Steve T]
Of course, he’s not an antisemite. Musk had in mind groups like the Antidefamation League (ADL), which have done exactly that in terms of pushing dialectical hatred. [More]
The real antisemites and racists are the antihuman Cultural Marxists who demand disarming all of us.
Virginia Dems Seek Ban on Assault Weapons After Election Wins [More]
With plenty of tax plunder to use against challenges.
Somebody want to tell race hustler Don Scott what “Jim Crow” really stood for when it came to guns?
And Jorge helped.
[Via Jess]
Domestic violence exacerbated by wartime, raising concerns over looser gun policies [More]
“Real reporter” Carrie Keller-Lynn asks us to agonize over speculative conflating that doesn’t qualify “violence,” doesn’t offer evidence of armed escalation, doesn’t factor in women taking advantage of the “looser policies,” and does not account for the effects of defenselessness, all the while exploiting the depradations of a known aberrant subpopulation to impose restrictions on Everykibbutz.
[Via Jess]
It’s over guys. Turn in your guns. The self-defense expert has spoken. [More]
He’s responding to a pro-citizen disarmament self-defense instructor. Y0u know, a real man.
As someone who has had his feet in both camps (I was talking about myself here), we could always see if Gospodin Systema is up for a little challenge…
A FACTUAL FINDING OF “VIOLENT DANGEROUSNESS” is the Key to disarming a particular person due to mental illness or otherwise. This finding of “violent dangerousness” may only arise after a full blown trial, which is analogous to hearings/ trials associated with placing a person in a mental health institution via an involuntary civil commitment process. [More]
That’s what “full due process” means, something the Sentence Firsters can’t tolerate.
And, of course, disarming only has a chance in custodial environments.
It has come to our attention that some Mental Health Companies have been billing individuals that are renewing permit a fee for doing a records check. [More]
You know, just like the Founders used to do…
Mitt Romney says he would vote for Democrat over Trump, Vivek Ramaswamy [More]
And guess who the head of the RNC is related to…
Greg Casar Asks Principal If Giving Teachers Guns Would’ve Stopped Marjory Stoneman Douglas Shooting [Watch]
Change “principal” to “cowardly anti-gun liar and Democrat apparatchik,” and you can guess what he’ll say. Meaning he is absolutely unqualified to offer subject matter expertise on anything but being useless to himself and everyone entrusted to his care in such a situation.
[Via Jess]
The aftermath of Bruen has also prompted a surge in lawsuits challenging various gun laws, according to Giffords, a gun control group, with more than 450 decisions trying to interpret the case. [More]
What a stacked deck. Because it’s not Giffords, which rakes in millions, that’s defending against infringment challenges. It’s various levels of government, with virtually unlimited tax plunder-funded legal war chests.
Meanwhile, the gun groups fighting on our behalf are begging for minimal contributions from already overextended members and supporters. Just don’t let the apparent success momentum of these efforts capitalizing on Bruen suggest it’s OK to ease up.
I may just write up a more detailed elaboration on this.
[Via Jess]
Can we take their silence as a “No”?
So say 3,400 obedient Illinoisans. [More]
The Pentagon is moving toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill humans [More]
Add that to their vaunted F-15s and nukes Democrats from Eric Swalwell to Joe Biden have threatened to unleash on Americans whom they don’t want to allow to own semiautos…
Mayor Eric Adams has been accused of sexual assault in a legal action filed Wednesday night in a New York court, The Messenger has learned. The plaintiff in the case, a woman whose name is being withheld by The Messenger due to the nature of the allegation, filed a summons Wednesday night in state Supreme Court in Manhattan under the Adult Survivors Act that names the Big Apple Democrat as a defendant. [More]
As much contempt as I have for the guy’s wannabe tyranny, this is bull$h!+ that some unknown person with who-knows-what axe to grind can mess with a man’s reputation this way. Unless we’re talking about a court order due to credible threats necessitating witness protection, The Messenger’s motives and credibility should be suspect.
The question now is if he will be hoisted with his own petard and disarmed — and if not, why not?
Omaha mayor signs bump stock ban, joining city curb on gun kits [More]
As I noted earlier when the city was adding harassment infringements to permitless carry:
While the position is officially nonpartisan, it’s interesting to note that Stothert is one of those “moderate” Republicans who take the fire out of the bellies of gun owners looking for alternatives to gun-grabbing Democrats. In her case, her husband’s 2021 suicide “from a self-inflicted gunshot wound” merits our sympathy, but not to the extent that using her political power to mandate life-endangering infringements should be tolerated.
[Via Jess]
The Fifth Circuit panel ruled that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ Final Rule is illegal. Circuit Judge Kurt D. Englehardt wrote, “An agency cannot label conduct lawful one day and felonious the next—yet that is exactly what ATF accomplishes through its Final Rule. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED to the extent it holds unlawful the two challenged portions of the Final Rule, and VACATED and REMANDED as to the remedy.” The case is known as VanDerStok v. Garland. [More]
A Justice Department that was true to the Constitution would be enforcing rights and punishing government transgressors.
A man who killed five people at a bank in Louisville earlier this year wrote in his journal that he wanted to demonstrate the consequences of gun laws that he viewed as too lenient, according to police. [More]
All this and he lied on the 4473… What a perfect Moms Demand spokespredator! Stop me before I kill again!
OK. BLAM!
Some of us are not surprised, and further posit that those who rabidly don’t trust others with freedom are really projecting difficulty containing their own inner beasts.
P!$$ on this freak. He doesn’t deserve a memorial that treats his well-deserved death like a loss.
[Via Dan Gifford]
Republican Celeste Maloy beat state Sen. Kathleen Riebe, a self-described moderate, to win Utah’s special election Tuesday night, filling the last remaining open seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. [More]
Does this look “moderate” to you?
This bill creates a waiting period for the delivery of an assault weapon.
Judge Robert Raschio in Harney County has declared Measure 114 to be “facially unconstitutional by a finding of clear and convincing evidence…” [More]
We Got Kicked Out of a Gun Buyback [Watch]
I’m liking this guy more and more, but I still need him to clarify something.
[Via Jess]
Looks like he’s off to a good start:
Javier Milei’s Presidential Platform: Privatization, Gun Rights, and Immigration Restrictions
I’ll have to look into how far he wants to go.
And it’s nice to see not all “libertarians” are idiots on immigration.
[Via Jess]
Biden campaign warns second Trump presidency would mean gun violence gets worse [More]
You gotta wonder how many of these people are going to fall right back into old voting habits.
That’s why I caution against getting too ecstatic.
The bills prohibit anyone convicted of a misdemeanor domestic violence offense from owning a firearm or ammunition for 8 years following the payment of all related fines and completion of incarceration or probation conditions. [More]
But we can otherwise trust him without a custodian because we all know prohibited persons won’t be able to get guns, right?
The other oft-overlooked point: Exaggerated or outright false vengeance charges can be made and people who are overwhelmed can be pressured into a misdemeanor plea to get the threat of more and more severe charges off their backs — especially if they’re of limited means and don’t understand their rights and where they can go for help.
If the GOP doesn’t blow ’24 and the court stays the same, expect SCOTUS to rule IAW Bruen. How much injustice will be done in the meantime, and how many won’t be able to afford to challenge the unlimited tax plunder resources of the state?
[Via Jess]
“The Justice Department will do everything in its power to find and hold accountable the gun traffickers who are arming the cartels.” [More]
Good one! And they’re headline whoring for the same reasons.
Why does Sir Wilfrid’s cross-examination of Frau Helm come to mind…?
Corporate Media Conspicuously Quiet After Memphis Man Kills Four in Multi-Location Rampage [More]
No one criticizes the DSM more than I do, but that is simply not so.
Then there’s this:
Laws, if enforced, would have prevented him from owning the firearm he used to shoot women and girls.
No, they would not have. They couldn’t have unless, like the gun-grabbers, your contention is that citizen disarmament edicts work to stop chronic criminals.
Credible gun influencers have a responsibility to know better than to parrot the NRA’s/NSSF’s “Enforce existing Intolerable Acts” crap.
As the NRA fades, a more zealous US pro-gun group rises as a lobbying power [More]
Well, that’s what happens when you keep pushing.
Look now for the violence monopolists to try and destroy GOA leaders.
They’re probably too stupid to realize that will just motivate even more zealous gun owners.
[Via Jess]
Pro-Hamas “Globalize The Intifada” Group Publishes NYC Target Map Of Enemies [More]
Has anyone overlaid this on top of the mandated “gun-free sensitive areas“?
[Via Michael G]
