Category: citizen disarmament

What Other Rights Can States Ignore?

This is the last stop for Ballot Measure 114 on a state level. Given the makeup and history of the Oregon courts, it would be wise to not be too optimistic about the outcome. As usual, we hope we are wrong on this issue. And, keep in mind, that, irrespective of the outcome, the Oregon Legislature will continue to enact every possible impediment to gun ownership in Oregon even as it seeks to protect criminals and the violently mentally ill. [More]

If only we had a Justice Department committed to protecting unalienable rights from state and local abuses…

(Inter)National Treasure

“Because, I mean, I really believe that immigrants are our treasure and our strength, and they’re what make this country what it is,” Lakshmi added. [More]

Spoken like a UN “Goodwill Ambassador” born in India and let into this country who wants to make us less like America and more like the $#!+hole she left.

Oh, look, she wants the government to disarm us, too.

Shh… don’t tell the “single issue” gun groups!

In the Spirit of Aloha

Hawaii Sensitive Places Defense Fund… The fact the State of Hawaii hired these big shots is proof they are scared we can win. Please donate what you can. [More]

I trust readers here need no introduction to Alan Beck…?

Here’s just one way costs accumulate.

And this is what the state can afford to bolster rights denial because it has comparatively unlimited tax plunder to draw from.

[Via Tacticool Memes]

A Perfect Understanding

The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has upheld a ban on possessing guns in parks, while completely misunderstanding basic principles of law. [Watch]

So their decision “contradicts SCOTUS”? And we’re sure it’s because they “misunderstand”?

I know what would happen if I went against a judge’s orders.

What will happen to them?

[Via Jess]

Stock Answers

Last week, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled, “Six Words Every Killer Should Know: ‘I Feared for My Life, Officer.” Using a mis-mash of half-baked statistics, legal misinformation, and cherry-picked anecdotes, it tried to make a case that there is just too much darned self-defense going on in America. [More]

Just what do rope-selling capitalists think that rope will ultimately be used for?

[Via Michael G]

Shutting Down Freedom

[T]he Firearm Access During Shutdowns Act was introduced by U.S. Sen. James Risch (R-Idaho), as S. 3085, and by U.S. Rep. Ben Cline (R-Va.), as H.R. 5874. The Act would guarantee law-abiding Americans can continue to exercise their Second Amendment rights during a government shutdown, requiring federal agencies to continue processing firearm applications and licenses during a government shutdown. [More]

Prognosis:

1% chance of being enacted

Report brought to you by the “Don’t Lie for the Other Guy” people…

We don’t need any bills to ensure continued recognition of the other amendments in the Bill of Rights because the presumption is there is nothing government is authorized to do in terms of prior restraint infringements.

Why is this one different, and why do “we” unquestioningly tolerate it?

Brain Teaser

Blast waves may be damaging shooters’ brains. The Times has a new investigation on how it happens. [More]

And any who believe this is anything more than another attack by the newsraper of record against guns needs to have their heads examined.

But watch the narrative get parroted and spread.

[Via Andy M]

Related UPDATE

Four Boxes Diner speculates they inadvertently put out information that can be used to argue for suppressors.

[Via Jess]

Next…

After Glock Redesign, Leading Gun-Control Group Calls on Ruger to Discontinue Popular Pistol [More]

Their turn in the barrel, eh? That’s the problem with feeding a circling pack of jackals instead of repelling it. All it does is encourage them to move in closer.

And as for AR-15s being next, that’s a big reason reason I felt compelled to get involved in the bump stock fight:

Who thinks the gun-grabbers won’t use that to further their goal of banning all such guns?

As I told more than one surrender monkey moron:

If anyone believes this is just about “bump stocks” they haven’t been paying attention…

And if anyone tells you it was all about strategic 3D chess, feel free to question their priorities and incentives.

Never forget the goal, laid out for us not by our words but by theirs.

[Via CP]

In the Spirit of Bipartisanship

Earlier this year, the plaintiff’s wife had been involuntarily admitted to a mental health facility, based on a language-related misunderstanding, resulting in her discharge with a diagnosis of “Adjustment disorder with depressed mood, seven weeks pregnant.” In April of 2025, acting on the information about his wife, the Fort Lee Police Department confiscated Mr. Aliaj’s firearms, ammunition, and related accessories from his home, without presenting any warrant or court order. [More]

Naturally, “the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office was taking the position that his weapons were confiscated under New Jersey’s ‘Duty to Inform’ law,” because Mark Musella is a New Jersey “Republican.”

“Law and order” über alles, right? Especially where “the supreme Law of the Land” is ignored as a matter of course.

[Via Jess]

Thank You, Captains Obvious

Prop 50: A Direct Threat to the Second Amendment [Watch]

Yes, Democrats mean to rule with a monopoly of power, which includes a monopoly of violence, and they’d do whatever it takes and then some. The unanswered question is how did California get this way and what have the gun groups –including CRPA — done to warn citizens and try to stop the root cause, or have they ignored it with a “single issue” excuse?

And will they keep ignoring it in places that have not yet turned because they’re afraid the communists will call them names?

[Via Jess]

Won’t Take ‘No’ for an Answer

How many times do they need to be rejected before they become stalkers?

Actually, it’s not that he doesn’t want to. It’s just that they’re frustrated he can’t satisfy them and are complaining to the neighbors about it.

We’re the Only Ones Infringing Enough

In keeping with the new state requirement that all would-be handgun buyers first acquire a purchase permit, the Delaware State Police have launched a portal for permit applications. Called the “Permit to Purchase Application Portal,” the webpage is used to gather personal information, including name, address, gender, date of birth, email, employment status (including employer info), and race and ethnicity information. [More]

And remember, “law-abiding” gun owners: Back the Blue!

When I think of portals, I don’t think of anything good coming out of the other side.

[Via bondmen]

And They Say There Are No Stupid Questions

Whether Illinois’ flat ban on ordinary citizens carrying firearms on public transportation violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. [More]

That this is even in question shows how far the Republic has degraded from the clear intent understood by the founders as a condition for ratification.

That the big worry now is if SCOTUS will even hear it, and if so, how it will rule, tells us more.

[Via Jess]

One Step Forward and Three Steps Back

Is There a Hidden Meaning in DOJ’s Position on Mag Bans? [Watch]

Let me get this straight: The “pro-gun” DOJ will defend magazines (because they believe bans are unconstitutional or because they think SCOTUS will rule against them?) but still demands license/registration requirements to carry and possess firearms and ammunition…?

If there’s a hidden meaning, they’re not hiding it very well. That seems kind of in-your-face…

And yeah, I’m vulnerable to being sucked in just like most gun owners.

“Full might” my… eye.

Verified by MonsterInsights