Yeah, So Much for a Good Guy with a Gun

Massive errors in FBI’s Active Shooting Reports from 2014-2023 regarding cases where civilians stop attacks: Instead of 4%, the correct number is at least 35%. Excluding gun-free zones, it averaged over 51.5%. [More]

Check out the video at the end.

Wanna read that line again, self-righteous, propaganda-parroting stage prop pretending to be a heroic FBI “Only One” with a gun?

FAFO

“He did not deserve to die this way. It’s such a tragedy that my husband was murdered in cold blood,” she said, though it remained unclear if she had seen the video of the shooting. [More]

Looks to me like that’s exactly what he deserved.

[Via bondmen]

Defense Against Carjacking by Armed Security Highlights Sotomayor’s Elitism on Guns

It’s good that Sotomayor’s security was able to defend themselves and repel a predator. It’s inexcusable that she won’t admit she has been wrong about our right to do the same. [More]

It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.

An Effective Combination

For the crime of running a huge survey on defensive gun use in the U.S. that was not forced into the narrative structure of today’s gun-control activism, William English, an assistant professor at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business, has been subpoenaed, attacked in The New York Times and by many other “mainstream” outlets and, basically, pilloried in order to, as he put it in The Wall Street Journal, “warn off other academics thinking of doing similar research, and to influence courts where states are losing on the merits.” [More]

Or as the Keeper always said:

[Via Jess]

We’re the Only Ones Uncommandeered Enough

Sonia Sotomayor saved from danger: Supreme Court Justice’s bodyguard shoots gun-wielding suspect who tried to steal his car outside her DC home [More]

Not that she wants you to be able to do that:

“In sum, the Framers did not write the Second Amendment in order to protect a private right of armed self defense.” — Sotomayor, with the dissent in McDonald

[Via Tacticool Memes]

FAFO

‘I don’t understand why he was shot because there were two men and just him. Why not hold him at gunpoint? Or why not beat him up?’ [More]

Those are all concerns someone with more than a split second to make an unplanned decision where adrenalin is surging might consider afterward.

There’s a better choice that could have been made in the first place.

[Via bondmen]

Uber Driving Customers Wild

Seattle Uber driver charged with rape and kidnapping after attack on female passenger… Investigators said family members assaulted Ali and took the woman out of the car. At some point during the confrontation, the victim’s father fired a gun twice, but the bullets did not strike anyone, according to the report. [More]

Damn policy violater

So… tell us more about Ali

[Via Jess]

More Than Meets the Eye?

A homeowner in Oakland was arrested after shooting and killing a robbery suspect. The 77-year-old homeowner was arrested on suspicion of murder. He remained behind bars on Tuesday while the district attorney considered whether to file charges. [More]

If he listens to his lawyer and keeps his mouth shut, he ought to be able to claim self-defense, but using a stolen gun doesn’t help and they may at least get him on that– assuming he’s not a “prohibited person” and “eligibile” for more, and that this wasn’t a dispute between associates…

[Via 1Gat]

Job One

Should You Use NFA Weapons for Self Defense? A Practical Perspective [More]

Use whatever you can get to in time, and don’t let distractions impede swift action. There’ll be no trumped up charges to face later if you don’t survive.

Chech and Balances

UPDATE: The Story of a Chechen Shot by a Special Ops Colonel Is Getting Weirder [More]

Sorry, I’m still not convinced it was a good shoot as opposed to “Only Ones” favoritism. Would I have had justification to use lethal force here, or would I be facing charges? Just not enough is known to pick up this banner and start waving it.

As for how the dead man’s family would know stuff that hasn’t been reported yet, I assume they have a lawyer and access to autopsy results and police communications not made public.

[Via Jess]

Chech Your Premises

The Colonel confronted Daraev, an altercation ensued, and Daraev was shot multiple times. [More]

Good thing it was outside Fort Br… uh…Liberty.

Now describe the what an “altercation” justifying lethal force looks like, because the accounts I’ve seen have been light on the details.

[Via bondmen]

Related UPDATE

Tinfoil Haturday: Special Ops Soldier Shoots Illegal Chechen Photographing His Kid, Then it Gets Weird [More]

The plot thickens…

[Via Michael G]

Proving a Negative

Received via email from WarOnGuns Correspondent Scott J:

Nearly every time the “news” tells you about a car wreck fatality, they tell you “they were not wearing a seat belt”.

Why don’t they tell you every time a person is attacked and killed, “they were not carrying a gun”?

That presumes it’s “news.”

Think of It as an Audition

“I’ve played law enforcement for 30 years. It’s just so different.” [More]

So assuming celebrities possess the wisdom, authority and virtues of the characters they play, and forming political opinions accordingly, is a mistake?

As for the dog-shooting incident, that clear violation of Instacart policy may open the door to another, more lucrative career.

[Via Sweet Babboo]

Verified by MonsterInsights