Category: Election Integrity

Stormy Whether

EXCLUSIVE: Stormy Daniels claims she was ‘slut shamed’ by female lawyer in Donald Trump trial [More]

And the past-her-shelf-life dumpster’s point is…?

Let’s consult an authoritative source, shall we?

slut noun ˈslət pluralsluts 1 disparaging + offensive : a promiscuous person : someone who has many sexual partners —usually used of a woman

and

whore 1 of 2 noun ˈhȯr ˈhu̇r pluralwhores Synonyms of whore 1 somewhat old-fashioned : a person who engages in sexual intercourse for pay : PROSTITUTE

But Sper… uh, Stormy’s right about one thing: to expect shame is hardly realistic.

‘Who Will Help Me Cut the Wheat and Take It to the Mill?’ Asked the Little Red Hen…

The rubicon has been crossed, now we must do everything in our power to elect Trump. The result at the ballot box MUST be overwhelming, and it will be! [More]

I wish I could say I shared his sense of assurance.

[Via Jess]

Insufficient Gun Owner Involvement in Unsuccessful Herrera Race Will Not Go Unnoticed

If this doesn’t change, correction, if we don’t change that, gun owners will be telling two supposedly opposite groups they can get away with more betrayals and infringements. [More]

Establishment Republicans and Prohibitionist Democrats just got a pretty good snapshot of gun owner willingness to walk the talk.

Hogan’s Zeroes

Republican Senate candidate Larry Hogan is warning Republicans in Washington, D.C., that he won’t be a reliable vote if Maryland chooses to send him to the Capitol. In a new TV ad aired Tuesday, the former Maryland governor stressed his bipartisan bona fides. “In the Senate, Republicans can’t count on my vote. [More]

Then what the hell good is he?

Not much.

Not Reading the Room

“If I wasn’t a libertarian I am now,” he said… He pledged to put a libertarian in his cabinet if he wins the election… [More]

As what? He realizes they demand open borders…?

Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders.

A few of them have dismissed my challenge outright, or tried to change the subject or talk around it by introducing new arguments that evade its points, but none have answered it.

Because they can’t and they know it.

And what’s with sharing the anarchy symbol adopted by Marxist Antifa?

It’s consistent with the Ⓐsshole who shouted “Donald Trump should have taken a bullet!”not being publicly identified, thrown out of the convention, and expelled from the Party. Instead, the “boos and heckling” were reserved for Trump.

Face it: The ones who would vote for RFK will hurt Biden more.

Speaking or not reading a larger room, the ever-suicidal and irrelevant LP hierarchy instead nominated a true believer who is bound and determined to make it an even bigger clown show with his full-throated endorsement of “drag queen story hours.”

‘Our Democracy’

There’s perhaps no statistic more shocking than the 69% of politically obsessed elites who think it would be better if only people with college degrees could vote. [More]

Adding new relevance to the question “What’s your major?…”

But that’s not ’til after, right?

So what do they tell the vet who enlisted after high school and came back a changed man?

[Via Michael G]

Biding a Reich

“This was not a campaign video, it was created by a random account online and reposted by a staffer who clearly did not see the word, while the president was in court,” Karoline Leavitt, the Trump campaign’s press secretary, said in a statement. [More]

And the original creator used “a vintage newspaper template.”

So who made it? I wonder if that was deliberate sabotage, to troll for it being shared.

In any case, the DSM is all over it.

Lie, Cheat and Steal

Last week, the Post’s editorial board — which speaks with the institutional voice of the newspaper — declared that it regards President Biden’s reelection in November as a matter of such importance that it will not fault him for promoting misbegotten policies that are designed to attract votes. The president’s policies “clearly pander to core constituencies,” the editorial board conceded, and “some of these policies are quite bad — even dangerous.” Other pandering by the White House may be “less obviously dangerous but still violates common sense and principle.” [More]

Why is anyone surprised?

And why is no one challenging this as an admission of intent to provide free publicity and suppress other information, making it an “in kind” campaign contribution reportable to the FEC?

[Via Michael G]