Police Cannot Seize Property Indefinitely After an Arrest, Federal Court Rules [More]
We need a court order to tell us they’re not allowed to steal?
Can we expect them to appeal?
[Via WiscoDave]
Notes from the Resistance
The Second Circuit has ruled that a Connecticut police officer is not entitled to qualified immunity after handcuffing, detaining, and conducting a warrantless search on the plaintiff’s car because they “presented a facially valid firearms permit and disclosed that he possessed a firearm pursuant to the permit” [More]
Pity there’s no way to send Nicholas Andrzejewski my regards…
[Via CP]
The decision, first announced by the Institute for Justice, means that Tennessee wildlife officers will no longer be allowed to access private lands unless they have explicit permission of the landowner, or have obtained a court-ordered search warrant. [More]
Damn Constitution takes all the fun out of being a JBF (Jackbooted Fudd)…
[Via Michael G]
The U.S. Postal Service has shared information from thousands of Americans’ letters and packages with law enforcement every year for the past decade, conveying the names, addresses and other details from the outside of boxes and envelopes without requiring a court order. [More]
Kinda seems like expecting privacy in that situation is hardly realistic. But it’s something to keep in mind if you’re one of the usual suspects…
Maybe when buying mail order items of interest, “gift” them to a pseudonym…?
[Via bondmen]
Xi Jinping’s Recipe for Total Control: An Army of Eyes and Ears [More]
At least the impulse is “bipartisan”…
Gun owners in the Golden State weren’t deprived of their Second Amendment nor privacy rights because the state only shares minimal biographical information with two research colleges, a Ninth Circuit panel found on Wednesday. [More]
Which will then be used by “The Hero of Medicine” to give cover for infringements to reach into all of their purchases, records, homes, safes…
[Via bondmen]
Senators push for quick action on FISA before surveillance authority lapses [More]
Hurry! We need it NOW!
What? “Include a warrant requirement for federal agencies to search U.S. citizens’ data”…?
No. Do it our way or we let the whole thing “go dark.”
Besides, we don’t negotiate with terrorists.
Received via email:
Here are the 117 GOP Jihadis who have declared their unholy war against the Constitution and the American people [More]
I also blame those who didn’t vote.
Way to take fire out of bellies before the election, Vichycons…
FBI Agents Captured on Video During Home Visit Admit They Spend ‘Every Day, All Day Long’ Interrogating Americans About Their Social Media Posts [More]
If they show up at your door, remember the rule.
[Via Michael G]
NYC to test gun detecting systems in subways amid security push [More]
And if they can have them there, why not Everywhere, in Everytown? If you don’t have to respect the Second Amendment, what’s to keep you from trampling on the Fourth?
After all, it’s for the greater good.
My first thought was of ways criminals and terrorists will defeat this, starting with preferential embedded assets.
[Via Jess]
Today, President Biden will issue an Executive Order to protect Americans’ sensitive personal data from exploitation by countries of concern. [More]
What if the U.S. is the country of concern?
[Via WiscoDave]
Pennsylvania Police Settle Lawsuit With Woman Forced to Undergo ‘Humiliating’ Strip-Search [More]
They ought to carry a collapsible pole in their trunk, and plenty of dollar bills…. maybe play a club mix over the PA…
Or “The Weight of the Badge“…
[Via Michael G]

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is initiating Project Tyr, an effort in its infancy to employ Amazon’s artificial intelligence-driven Rekognition cloud service to identify firearms—among other things—and the people associated with them. [More]
They figure we know their intentions well enough by now to where they don’t need to add the “ant” at the end.
[Via Andy M]