Notes from the Resistance
For this reason, I will be introducing the Safer Neighborhoods Gun Buyback Act of 2023… [Watch]
If at first you don’t succeed, right, genius?
Democrat constituents do it to themselves– and not just politically.
The object is to not let them do it to the rest of us.
[Via Jess]
“High-capacity magazines were designed for one purpose and one purpose only — high-capacity killing — and have been used in some of the deadliest mass shootings in America,” Menendez said in a statement. [More]
Is that why you oath-breaking scumbag treasonous, tyrannical POS Democrats demand your trigger-happy enforcers be the “Only Ones” having them?
At the moment, gun owners are somewhat protected by the State Judge’s injunction though thousands are still being denied their rights due to the inaction of the Oregon State Police. However, the Oregon Department of Justice, and its militantly anti-gun Attorney General have made it quite clear that they will do all they can to force the implementation of Mz 114 and its unconstitutional and extreme restrictions on civil rights. [More]
The intent is to disarm citizens. And they won’t stop until they’re stopped.
Latest Supreme Court-related ruling overturning gun regulations worries domestic violence survivor advocates [More]
Yeah, well their demands to throw due process out the window and eviscerate the rights of those inclined to obey disarmament edicts without due process is the more worrisome prospect.
[Via Jess]
Yes: Tobacco. The tobacco industry is exactly the model that I think of in terms of the decades of work that it will take to address this issue.” [More]
You know, “dirty, deadly, and banned.”
But no one is talking about taking your guns.
As an aside, “journalist” Rita Braver, with her practiced “empathy,” is obviously performing for the camera. I wonder how many viewers realized that was to manipulate their emotions while they were being presented with only one side and the wrong side at that.
What can I say but “CBS“?
[Via Jess]
“Harry Styles” + gun [More]
Don’t worry. He’s made sure everybody knows his body’s guarded.
So a Brit donated $1M to Everytown so they could support or oppose candidates to impose citizen disarmament edicts that were resisted at Lexington and Concord.
And a word from Harry is a free publicity appeal to the mindless.
Funny, how the doctrinaire Marxists say we should eat the rich.
Their intent, of course, is to replace the rich.
The complaint alleges that in Sept. 2022, just two days after A.B.’s teacher, Tom Griffin, covered students’ free speech rights in government class, A.B. was suspended from school for wearing a shirt that said “What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ do you not understand?” and featured an image of a rifle. [More]
Actually, this whole business of compulsory public education seems ripe for Bill of Rights challenges. The government, instituted among men to secure the Blessings of Liberty, is teaching our Posterity to be suspects and inmates, whose bodies are the property of the state, rather than sovereign Citizens.
And ol’ Tom sounds like a real piece of…work.
[Via Remarks]
GRNC ALERT PURCHASE PERMIT REPEAL GETS HEARING TUESDAY [More]
How loud will demands be so they hear it? Put another way, which NC gun owners aren’t adding their voices?
Rep. Angie Craig attacked in elevator of her DC apartment building, office says [More]
Gee, that’s too f****n’ bad.
Democratic Rep. Maxwell Frost says Florida’s proposed permitless carry law is ‘fascism’ [More]
Then again, it is the standard Antifa indictment of anyone who’s not a raging commie.
Our best and our brightest don’t always go into politics, do they?
Stupid, overprivileged little sh!+head…
[Via Remarks]
The specific additional “sensitive places” designations that are challenged in the amended lawsuit include parks, beaches, recreational facilities or playgrounds or areas owned or controlled by a state, county or local government unit, plus youth sports events, an airport or public transportation hub, and various health care facilities. These areas were designated “sensitive” because the New Jersey Legislature was determined to “continue minimizing the carry of handguns as much as possible,” the lawsuit notes. [More]
Honestly, who ever heard of anyone being attacked in any of those places?
The Second Amendment Foundation and its partners in a federal case challenging the federal prohibition on handgun sales to young adults ages 18-20, has filed a reply brief supporting their motion for summary judgment in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. [More]
And the same Democrats who say they want them unarmed because they’re too immature are counting on 16-year-olds to vote for them.
LA Supervisors Push .50 Cal. Rifle Ban After 9mm Pistol Used in Shooting [More]
I’m surprised it’s taken that long, considering the opposition has been flaccid for over 20 years.
[Via bondmen]
ATF Director Steve Dettelbach talks about enforcing gun laws amid surge in mass shootings [More]
Funny. That’s the same thing so many of our “gun rights leaders” say we need to do.
And note this admission:
But at ATF, our job is to take the rules and laws that Congress has passed…
Yeah, about that…
And while we’re on the subject, perhaps someone will be good enough to point out where Congress is delegated with the authority to infringe…?
[Via Jess]
“This Is Not A Gun Bill.” [More]
You just can’t have guns while practicing defensive tactics with your friends.
I wonder what the Green Mountain Boys would have said about that.
Just to be clear, there is no such thing as “constitutional carry”. The constitution didn’t give anyone the right to carry guns publicly without permits, background checks, or training. This term was fabricated by the gun lobby to push for its any guns to anyone everywhere agenda. [More]
Just to be clear, the Constitution (capitalized) does not “give” rights. That deception was fabricated by the lying citizen disarmament lobby to swindle the ignorant.
[Via bondmen]
UPDATE
And just to be clear, they’re a self-admitted hate group:
H.R. 660: To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to require the safe storage of firearms, and for other purposes. [More]
159 treasonous Democrats have signed on as co-sponsors, and there’s a companion bill in the Senate.
Chances of passage with a Republican House are low, but you never know when the planets will converge to persuade the Vichycons to jump ship.
[Via Jess]
This technical change pushes “others” within the definition of “assault weapon” under Connecticut’s ban… While residents of other states are able to register these firearms with the ATF, or change the short barrels for longer ones to make them legal, the ATF has stated that it will not permit any such registrations from Connecticut residents due to Connecticut’s “assault weapon” ban. Nor will changing out the barrels avoid redesignation as banned “assault weapons” under Connecticut law. [More]
Damned if they did, damned if they didn’t.
