New data shows ATF gun store revocations at highest rate in 16 years [More]
One bite at a time…
So, let’s see: Bloomberg’s The Trace teams up with USA Today/Gannett to quote David Chipman… Now that’s “real reporting”!
[Via Jess]
Notes from the Resistance
California law seeking to deter legal challenges to gun laws in that state is now under major legal threat. The pro 2A groups suing over the anti civil-rights law were just given the great news that federal district Court Judge District Roger Benitez has been assigned the case. [Watch]
NOW how many years…?
[Via Jess]
Dem Senator Targets Gun Group Over Its Secret Gun Registry [More]
In other words, he’s trying to sow discord to divide and conquer by embarrassing and coercing them into surrendering industry data…?
You kinda wonder what his end game is, and why Chris Wray agrees with him on guns…
[Via Jess]
Freeman said the insurance requirement was analogous to some 19th-century laws requiring gun owners to post bond in order to carry a gun. [More]
Ah yes, Licky Liccardo’s law…
The antis will try to use Bruen’s “historical understanding” to justify every disarmament edict they can think up. Let unsaid with that approach:
Were those edicts ever challenged on Second Amendment grounds? Because what they won’t find is the Supreme Court upholding such “laws.”
[Via Jess]
FOIA Uncovers ATF and Legacy Media Working Together [More]
Hey, they’re going with what works.
Anybody surprised to find USA Today/Gannett at the bottom of this?
Woke Portland mayor LAUGHS at woman’s safety concerns over growing homelessness [More]
At least her tax dollars help make sure he’s taken care of.
[Via Michael G]
Sometimes referred to as “policing for profit,” civil asset forfeiture has become big business, generating significant revenue for the state, local, and federal law enforcement agencies across the country. [More]
I wonder what men who considered a tea tax intolerable and cause for rebellion would have made of all this…
[Via Michael G]
‘The police come here to hunt’: Brazilian cops kill at 9 times the rate of U.S. law enforcement [More]
What does that really mean, who are they killing, and what kind of circumstances are we talking about here? And how does that compare with the “good old days”?
Seems kind of self-defeating that Brazilians are poised to oust the guy who wants them armed and bring in a corrupt Marxist who demands disarming them and bringing back an “Only Ones”-enforced monopoly of violence.
It figures the DSM would put out a timely hit piece to help make that happen, with The Los Angeles Times leading the pack.
[Via bondmen]
I had an understanding that there was a requirement that the law needed to be written so that an ordinary citizen could understand it. How else can you require an ordinary citizen to comply with a law? [More]
Who says the rulers want us to?
And as for the “requirements,” they’re going to have an awfully tough time when reading comprehension has been deliberately degraded in the public schools.
[Via DDS]
CERTIORARI DENIED
21-159 APOSHIAN, W. C. V. GARLAND, ATT’Y GEN., ET AL. [More]
All the Supreme Court has to do to let tyranny stand is…nothing.
I’m wondering if anyone will revisit this in light of Bruen, but then again, the court has pretty much told us they’re not going to touch it.
Some of us will keep fighting in other ways.

“MAYBE what it will do is get some Member(s) of Congress to request GAO to do a forensic audit of the NFRTR to determine its accuracy and reliability,” another one of my “small cadre” advisors chimed in, pointing out the elephant in the room that “amnesty” proponents don’t much want to talk about. [More]
They have no authority to do it, they have no capability to do it, and on top of that, it’s a trap. Sounds like SOP for ATF.

If Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) and U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine (D) face off in a possible 2024 U.S. Senate contest, 41 percent of Virginians would support Kaine, while 39 percent could support Youngkin, according to this year’s survey. [More]
“More… we need more!” says Mark Warner.
Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue”. And I have that on good authority…
[Via Mack H]
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is issuing this open letter to further assist the firearms industry and the public in understanding whether a “partially complete, disassembled, or nonfunctional” receiver of an AR-15/M-16 variant weapon has reached a stage of manufacture such that it “may readily be completed, assembled, restored, or otherwise converted” to a functional receiver, and is therefore classified as a “frame or receiver” or “firearm” in accordance with the final rule titled “Definition of ‘Frame or Receiver’ and Identification of Firearms (Final Rule 2021R-05F), which became effective August 24, 2022. [More]
At least until they change the rules again.
[Via Jess]

At least 16 hurt in 9 shootings during bloody day in NYC: cops [More]
Ah, the original Bloomberg City! The one he and his fellow violence monopolists are bent on remaking the rest of the country in the image of…
How are those “sensitive zones” working out?
[Via bondmen]
CONNECTICUT CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE AND SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION SUE CT OVER BAN ON MODERN SPORTING ARMS [More]
I dunno– “in Common Use for Lawful Purposes Throughout the United States” seems to exclude everything that’s not, including what will be developed in the future.
The Supreme Court, in its infamous Miller decision, nonetheless recognized the function of the Militia, defined as “all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense [and] bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time,” was — and still is — to field citizen soldiers. These citizens bore arms that were suitable for that purpose, “ordinary military equipment” intended to be taken into “common defense” battles. The Militia did not assemble on the green bearing clubs and spears. They came with the intent to match and best a professional military threat. A modern Militia would require citizens to keep and bear exactly what the gun-grabbing politicians are trying to take away from them, what they pejoratively denounce as “weapons of war.”
Second Amendment will be Nullified if ‘Common Use’ is Restricted to ‘Popularity’