Notes from the Resistance
The Justices Are Bad Gun Historians – The Supreme Court’s recent rulings on gun rights play fast and loose with the country’s traditions of owning and regulating firearms [More]
Either that or Jack Rakove wants to challenge Saul Cornell to be the Slippin’ Jimmy of revisionist history…
Shall we see where he goes wrong?
[Via Jess]
Today the Illinois Appellate Division reversed a lower court decision that had dismissed a legal challenge to the Cook County tax on firearms and ammunition sales. [More]
That case has been going back and forth for years. I’d reserve words like “huge” for the final decision, whenever that is.
[Via Jess]
US District Court judge Glenn Suddaby finds that NY ban on guns in public housing violates the 2nd Amendment. [More]
That’s all fine and good, but I still want to know why forcing me to pay for someone else’s living costs don’t violate the 13th Amendment…
I wonder what the text, history, and tradition at the time of ratification would have to say about that…
[Via Jess]
UPDATE
Crazy news out of California. the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: A three- judge panel has decided that they are going to literally, literally do nothing, do nothing for likely over a year when it comes to the case of Miller vs. Bonta… [Watch]
The robed traitors are waiting for the fix to come in on the elections so Democrats can reshape SCOTUS and reverse Bruen…
[Via Jess]
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has decided to hear en banc the Bianchi v. Brown MD “assault weapon” ban case and, thus, prevent a likely favor 2A ruling from being issued by the three-judge panel of that court. [Watch]
And as I’ve said, if the Republicans blow the elections and Dems manage to change SCOTUS, we’ll get to see which side is more serious.
[More]
Who thinks doing this in NRA’s backyard isn’t deliberate?
Mark W. Smith elaborates on a major government brief.
[Via Jess]
Judge allows challenge to NY assault weapons ban to proceed [More]
Mark W. Smith explains why that’s “huge.”
[Via Jess]
Are we talking about criminals that are obliterating serial numbers which has always happened in American history, um, or something else…? [Watch]
Are we talking about violence monopolist propagandists using deception to advance a citizen disarmament agenda…?
“Real reporter” Matthew Sedacca certainly is a tool.
[Via Jess]
And semiautos/magazines…?
US District Court of Southern District of California finds that gun purchase restrictions on 18-20 year olds in California is constitutional under the 2nd Amendment. [More]
What kind of evil, lying traitor would you have to be to rule that way? So much for judicial conduct.
His treason will, of course, eventually be overturned, provided the Republicans don’t blow ’24…
[Via Jess]
US Supreme Court justice Amy Coney Barrett just ordered the defendants in National Association for Gun Rights v. Naperville to explain why the court should not enjoin Illinois’s “assault weapon” ban law. [Watch]
And again with the Barden/Sandy Hook ad intro…
[Via Jess]
ANTI-GUN SCHEME IN BIANCHI “ASSAULT WEAPON” BAN CASE? Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner addresses whether the US Court of Appeals for the Four Circuit in Playing Games in Bianchi “Assault Weapon” ban case. The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (VA, MD, NC) has been sitting on the Bianchi case since its December 6, 2022 oral argument. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner offers a potential explanation for this insane delay. [More]
Our rights are their playthings…?
[Via Jess]
A FACTUAL FINDING OF “VIOLENT DANGEROUSNESS” is the Key to disarming a particular person due to mental illness or otherwise. This finding of “violent dangerousness” may only arise after a full blown trial, which is analogous to hearings/ trials associated with placing a person in a mental health institution via an involuntary civil commitment process. [More]
That’s what “full due process” means, something the Sentence Firsters can’t tolerate.
And, of course, disarming only has a chance in custodial environments.
Fifth Circuit judge defends lower-court ruling in Rahimi, domestic-violence order gun ban case [More]
Mark W. Smith explains why this sends a “powerful 2A Message To SCOTUS.”
[Via Jess]
