Tag: Merrick Garland

Today’s Low-Hanging Fruit Report

So a mouthy Pakistani frostback who should have never been allowed onto this continent and doesn’t even have the gear is all the “Boogedy-Boogedy” needed to spook the herbivores into demanding an AR ban.

And yes, millions of Democrats are stupid enough to fall for this.

Tell us more about “the greatest threat,” AG Garland…

I’d comment to Shannon but she blocked me because I was asking embarrassing questions.

[Via Jess]

From the Jaws of Victory

House Defeats Resolution Holding Garland In Contempt – Here are the Four GOPers Who Voted NO [More]

I’ve always known Dave Joyce to be a lump, and I don’t know much about Duarte and Turner (except the latter voted to fund Joe Biden’s “Office of Gun Violence Prevention”), but McClintock cited some reasons that gave me pause on impeachment of Mayorkas.

I’m trying to figure out what’s going on with him– I’ve been impressed with him for a long time.

[Via Michael G]

While the Iron is Hot

Major breaking news: Attorney General Merrick Garland and his solicitor general are trying to strike while the iron is hot, so they think. They have just requested of the United States Supreme Court that the court take a series … of cases involving Second Amendment challenges … basically trying to take advantage of what they think is a huge win for them in the Rahimi case… [Watch]

It was a huge win. It showed just how malleable all the “good” Bruen judges, with the exception of Clarence Thomas, are.

And like all jackals, emboldened when they sense weakness, they move the circle in to attack.

[Via Jess]

Fun Times in Cleveland Again

New center to help prevent gun violence coming to Cleveland [More]

Nice parroting of the government’s narrative, “real reporter” Julia Bingel.

Looking forward to the follow-up in a year on how it all came true.

At least we’re not Detroit.

Contempt from the Contemptible

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House voted Wednesday to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over audio of President Joe Biden’s interview in his classified documents case, Republicans’ latest and strongest rebuke of the Justice Department as partisan conflict over the rule of law animates the 2024 presidential campaign. [More]

If Vanderboegh were still around, I’d ask him if he wanted to do it again.

I see Dave Joyce is still useless and voting just like his predecessor.

Nothing to result from this in 3…2…1…

[Via Jess]

The March of Progress

Attorney General Delivers Remarks at ATF’s Third Annual Chiefs of Police Executive Forum on Crime Guns … First: our work is far from over. Progress is only progress. Our work is not done until all Americans feel safe in their communities. [More]

Boy, talk about slopping the hogs…

What have we learned about “progress“? And “feelings“?

Speaking of which, I don’t feel safe knowing these official swineherds can dispatch their JBTs out to flashbang my house at 3 a.m. if they think I have arms reserved for “Only Ones,” and execute any family member who so much as twitches…

We so dodged a bullet…

[Via Antigone]

Tell Us They’re Guilty Without Telling Us They’re Guilty

The Justice Department on Thursday informed House Republicans that President Joe Biden has formally asserted executive privilege over the audio of his interview with special counsel Robert Hur, a move that DOJ says effectively shields Attorney General Merrick Garland from any criminal exposure as the Republican lawmakers move toward trying to hold him in contempt of Congress. [More]

Gee, DOJ stonewalling Congress on contempt: Where have we seen THAT before?

I’m envisioning what an “Only One” would ask if a citizen did not waive their rights and give permission to look in their trunk.

Boy, ol’ Carlos Uriarte can weasel-word with the best of them, can’t he?

It’s All in the Optics

Garland’s comments come in an election year when violent crime is a major campaign issue, and one that Biden’s opponent, former President Donald Trump has attacked him on.  [More]

By their motivation ye shall know them.

And guess what they deliberately don’t mention when they assure us violent crime is down.

[Via Jess]

Two Nations

AG GARLAND ON UVALDE SHOOTING: “Our children deserve better than to grow up in a country where an 18-year-old has easy access to a weapon that belongs on the battlefield, not in a classroom.” [More]

First off, they’re not “our children,” collectivist. They’re “my children” and “your children.” And we saw what depending on the “Only Ones” resulted in.

Remember what Vanderboegh asked about two nations divided by the answer to this fundamental question:

Does the government serve the people or do the people serve the government?

Hey, remember when Vichycon Leon H. Wolf, now managing editor of The Blaze, said Trump stood no chance in 2016 and advised Republicans to confirm Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court?

Merrick Garland’s Already Got People Working On It

Biden’s DOJ to stop him in 3…2..1…

After all, the DSM tell us Operation Lone Star is “racist and murderous.”

Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.

[Via Andy M]

Today’s Low-Hanging Fruit Report

…“the FBI is not only exaggerating the threat of white supremacy, but is also embedding confidential human sources within white nationalist groups and encouraging members of these groups to engage in illegal activity.” [More]

I want to see the treasonous motherf*****s sanctioning, ordering, and executing this end up in gen pop.

That includes you, Garland, and you, Wray.

[Via Doc]

The Big Guy’s Boy

DOJ Openly Ignores Hunter Biden’s Ties to International Arms Trafficker Who Sold Grenade Launchers, Anti-Tank Missiles [More]

HEY, LOOK EVERYBODY: STORMY DANIELS! And the thought strikes that she hasn’t done anything to advance her career that Kamala Harris hasn’t done to advance hers. That and Merrick Garland’s the bigger whore.

[Via bondmen]

Curses, Foiled Again!

The Court ORDERS that Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, and employees are enjoined from implementing or enforcing against Polymer80, Inc. or its customers, in any manner, the provisions in 27 C.F.R. § 478.11 and 478.12 that this Court has determined are likely unlawful. [More]

Garland again,

This didn’t age well, did it, Leon?

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights