Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

The Company She Keeps

Democratic Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett co-rented a car in 2006 with a previously convicted robber whose car crash caused her to be sued for damages at the start of her law career, records obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation show. [More]

It’s a real insight into the content of her character that Budget had to sue her and she played the entitlement card by saying the contract was invalid. Especially when she’s doing it again by stiffing her condo association for owed dues.

Ditto for Soweto. No wonder Jasmine wants us to be disarmed:

I’d say she did us a favor by running for Senate where she’ll be creamed, but anyone hateful, envious, and stupid enough to vote for her in the first place will happily elect another scammer, and they’ll be happy to take her back if she decides to reconsider.

The Democrat machine is already sending strong signals that she needs to.

[Via Michael G]

We’re the Only Ones Deflating Enough

Gilbert, AZ, previously ranked as America’s 2nd safest big city, was EXPOSED after a former city council member revealed that Gilbert’s crime reporting polices were changed to artificially LOWER the crime stats. [More]

In fairness, Chief Michael Soelberg only makes $261,098, and other snouts suck up more from the trough than that, so I guess you get what you pay for.

[Via Matthew L]

An Inconvenient Truth

You cannot meaningfully reduce the number of guns in the United States without building a system capable of finding them, compelling disclosure, and forcibly removing them when people decline to cooperate. [More]

And yes:

We believe gun-control advocates – or their leadership anyway – consider the deeply totalitarian implications she draws out to be not a bug but a feature. We think they want to shape the kind of society in which the kind of total. smothering force she describes can be exerted, much more than they want to “reduce gun violence” or any of the other goals they talk about.

It’s not about guns. It’s about freedom.

And having history to show us what totalitarians are capable of, it’s existential.

Like Dr. Banner said…

[Via Michael G]

A Spree Grows in Brooklyn

Niece of NYC’s Gun Violence Prevention Czar among 6 teens shot outside sweet 16 party… The family of a 15-year-old victim exclusively spoke to Eyewitness News and said the teen was standing outside waiting for an Uber after the party when she was struck. [More]

“…early Sunday morning”…?

“This is a lot for me because I feel like a parent, I feel like a father that wants to protect his daughter to go to any length to make sure that she’s alright and safe,” Mann said.

Looks like we need more “commonsense gun safety laws.”

Good grief.

[Via Steve T]

An Equal and Opposite Reaction

Leftist podcast host Jennifer Welch has accused Charlie Kirk of “justifying” his own assassination through his pro-Second Amendment stance. [More]

Low-hanging fruit and avatars… what could go wrong?

I see she never took a class that taught Newton’s Third Law of Motion.

[Via bondmen]

Concealed Carry Killers Redux

Legally armed civilians, we’re told, pose a major danger. They shoot innocent bystanders, justifiably kill others whenever they personally believe “force is reasonably necessary,” and rely on racist self-defense laws. [More]

One question: Why do they refer to violence monopoly propaganda apparatchik Mark Maremont as a “reporter”?

And as per the playbook of resurrecting old scare tactics that didn’t work the first time, such bleating isn’t even original.

I just got a subscription solicitation in the mail from WSJ. They get the same reply FOP did.

[Via bondmen]

A ‘Proven Conservative’

GOP Candidate Amy Fennell Wanted to Keep ‘Treasonous Felon’ Trump Out of White House – A series of recent social media posts from Fennell show the Republican candidate blasting Trump while supporting Kamala Harris. [More]

Nope, nothing about RKBA…

Not surprising if she wanted to help enable Kamala to do this…

[Via Sweet Babboo]

We’re the Only Ones Acid Tested Enough

“Ashley Wasielewski was returning home from Forsyth Park when unknown attacker poured acid on her… We have no evidence that this is part of a larger pattern or that there is an ongoing threat to the public,” Gunther said. [More]

Tell us you have no idea what you’re talking about without telling us you have no idea what you’re talking about, Lenny.

Figures, Savannah’s on the list.

‘AND TO KEEP AND CARRY ARMS WHEREVER THEY WENT’

This is a heck of a case. Watch this, because he does a good job explaining Gardner v Maryland, where a traveler forced to defend herself got hosed by Maryland violence monopolists..

I want to know why my A-rated Republican Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost did not join in with the other state AGs, and why my two A-rated Republican Senators, John Husted and Bernie Moreno, didn’t join in with Ted Cruz and all those other senators. I think I’ll ask them.

Also, in the briefs I’ve seen so far, there’s one case that’s not cited, and not being a lawyer that seems more than curious to me as it has direct bearing because it was decided by the Supreme Court.

In the infamous Dred Scott decision, SCOTUS made one admission that showed what the court’s thinking was on this exact issue when it rationalized:

“It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, AND TO KEEP AND CARRY ARMS WHEREVER THEY WENT. [Emphasis added]

Educate a poor non-mouthpiece layman here who holds the simple notion that “shall not be infringed” means what it says and is jaded enough to believe the gun-grabbers understand that, too. Why isn’t anyone bringing up a part of Scott v Sandford that would survive where the rest of the decision would fall?

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights