741 Former High-Ranking National Security Officials Endorse Harris – The list includes those officials who claimed Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian propaganda. [More]
That’s a pretty good mid-level enemies list.
[Via Michael G]
Notes from the Resistance
Four people were killed and 17 others were injured when multiple shooters opened fire Saturday evening in a bustling entertainment district in Birmingham, Alabama, in what police now believe was a targeted “hit.” [More]
Notice how it’s all boiled down to “conversion devices,” like that’s the issue…?
[Via Dan Gifford]
Received via email:
Mass Immigration Reduction Act of 2024
- Rep. Rosendale Introduces Legislation to Secure the Border | U.S. Representative Matt Rosendale
- Text – H.R.6940 – 118th Congress (2023-2024): Mass Immigration Reduction Act of 2024 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
- Should U.S. Adopt an Immigration Moratorium? | Newsmax.com
- Rep Rosendale introduces immigration package to restore Trump-era policies, ‘shut down the border’ | Fox News
- Legislation | Immigration Accountability Project
Prognosis 1% chance of being enacted
What further proof is needed that we are being ruled by traitors?
New Anti-Gun Group Focused on State Legislatures [More]
To quote a line from The Patriot:
Would you tell me please, Mr. Howard, why should I trade one tyrant three thousand miles away for three thousand tyrants one mile away? An elected legislature can trample a man’s rights as easily as a king can.

This guide estimates where candidates stand on gun issues by comparing their views with those of a control group of gun owners. As noted below, a “4-STAR” candidate agrees with the control group on at least 90% of gun issues, a 3-STAR agrees on least 80%, a 2-STAR on at least 70%, a 1-STAR on at least 60%, and a 0-STAR candidate agrees on less than 60% of gun issues. [More]
It’s a place to start and will no doubt be “single issue” strong.
I’d like to see the criteria and if “the greatest threat” is considered.
Got some X tips while I was out:
China’s New Export Restriction Choke Hold on Critical U.S. Ammunition Components, Are You Prepared? [More]
No, if course I’m not prepared. No one is prepared for the larger issue of critical material supplies that can be cut off at any time in the hands of those who want to eat us.
And that’s just the way the men behind the curtain want things.
Got in last night just before midnight.
Now I get to check the news and sort through emails…
But not until after I finish an article for Firearms News… I started it before we left and got the answers I needed over the weekend.
Hopefully, I can start posting new stuff this afternoon.

I’ll be back Monday.
Please hold off on further inputs until I return because I don’t want to see anybody’s efforts wasted.
US seizes over 350 websites used to import gun parts from China [More]
What, China is committing human rights violations…?
[Via Jess]

Illegal aliens voting away your 2A rights? [More]
Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.
[Via Jim Stephens]

Almost daily, legislators propose new gun laws aimed at reducing crime rates. However, both new and existing laws are unlikely to impact crime significantly. With over 90 years of gun control legislation and crime data, it’s clear that these laws do little to curb criminality or save lives. [More]
“Gun Control” doesn’t work, at least for its stated justification.
A bill introduced after a mass shooting in Maine would require the Army to use state crisis intervention laws to remove the weapons of a service member who is deemed to be a serious threat to themselves or others, U.S. Sen. Susan Collins, the bill’s sponsor, said Monday. [More]
“Deemed” how? What part does due process play?
And if he’s a “serious threat,” will he still have physical access to the public?
And yeah, every time you donate through WinRed, the Vichycons get their cut.
[Via bondmen]

Goldman literally says Trump must be eliminated. [More]
And we know who pulls his strings…
Funny… former Biden press secretary Jen Psaki didn’t seem to mind…
[Via bondmen]
…26 million Americans believe “the use of force” is justified to keep Trump from regaining the presidency. [More]
They mean “by others,” and like the MSNBC moron, most have no clue that it could blow back on them up close and personal. They think they’ll read about it, make some “serve’s the fasicsts right” comments on social media, and that’ll be the end of it.
[Via bondmen]