Again with the Lie

House Republicans just voted to prohibit the CDC from studying gun deaths and gun injuries. [More]

And here I thought it was just to stop tax plunder from being used to stump for citizen disarmament

Dr. Mark Rosenberg, Director of the CDC’s National Center for Injury Control and Prevention (NCIPC) in 1994 told The Washington Post: “We need to revolutionize the way we look at guns, like what we did with cigarettes. Now it [sic] is dirty, deadly, and banned.”

[Via Jess]

No Charge!

The Brooklyn District Attorney had “no choice but to dismiss” Council Member Inna Vernikov’s weapons charge given her gun was “inoperable” … The council member’s charge, criminal possession of a firearm, requires the weapon in question be “capable of firing bullets” — meaning Vernikov’s charges wouldn’t stand, according to the District Attorney’s office. [More]

So New Yorkers can have 80% receivers now…?

Or more likely, they were politically afraid to p!$$ off the wrong group of NY political power players…

Kingmaker?

Could evangelical leader’s endorsement upend Trump’s massive lead before Iowa’s caucus? [More]

Well, let’s see

“Vander Plaats ran unsuccessfully for Governor of Iowa in 2002, 2006, and 2010. He was the party’s nominee for lieutenant governor in 2006, losing to Democrat Patty Judge.”

And his organization doesn’t think the right to keep and bear arms and immigration are important enough to feature as “Policy Issues.”

How they believe leaving core constituents out will help advance the issues they do care about is left unsaid. Which suits the Democrats just fine.

Looks like Faux News and the Vichycons are doing their best to listen to losers and keep the Stupid Party stupid.

Why?

Idiot du Jour

We should levy an additional tax on firearms and ammunition to help treat victims, including people who must live with the horror of gun violence. Maybe then gun manufacturers and their supporters would think twice about marketing their wares to unstable, angry customers. [More]

Flesh that out with details for us Dorothy, so everyone can see how clueless you really are.

It looks from “Comments” like nobody’s buying her line of sh!+ either, which, considering where this appeared, is a real positive sign that average Americans are seeing through the absurdity of all the stupid infringements.

[Via Dan Gifford]

Gun Stats

Ammo.com has compiled them for Global Civilian Firearm-Ownership, Global Civilian Firearm Rates & Gun Deaths, Gun Ownership Rates By State, What State Has the Most Guns Gun, Ownership Per Capita By State, Percentage of Gun Ownership by State, State Firearm Ownership and Firearm-Related Deaths, Firearm Ownership & Firearm-Related Deaths, Firearm Ownership & Firearm-Related Suicides, Firearm Ownership & Firearm-Related Homicides, and ATF Seizures and State of Origin. [More]

Just a subjective design comment here: If I were doing it, I’d replace ✅ with ☠️ under “Permit to Purchase” and “State Background Check.”

And the Crowd Went Wild

Guy gives new meaning to “Reading Rainbow”…

I guess if you smear them as book-burning Nazis, violence against women is woke.

Funny, the reading that is withheld from children.

[Via WiscoDave]

Point of Origin

Illinois Assault Weapons Ban Faces New Challenge… The petition argues that Justices Elizabeth Rochford and Mary Kay O’Brien participated in the case despite receiving campaign contributions from those who support the ban. [More]

Now I want you to remember who did the original work that made this possible:

[T]he research and publicity this article has caused has led to a petition with the US Supreme Court on Caperton V Massey grounds, which was first brought up in this piece.

Take it from someone who knows what it’s like to be “bigfooted” out of a story by the media and latecomers.

I’ll probably put something together over the weekend to give this wider exposure. In the meantime, if you see any YouTube gun influencers who don’t give credit to Mom-At-Arms, notify viewers in their video comments.

Verified by MonsterInsights