Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

Just Like the Founders Intended

Editorial in today’s Uvalde Leader-News calls for gun safety measures: “Raise the legal age to purchase all firearms to 21… Remove liability protections for firearms manufacturers… And for God’s sake, restrict high-capacity magazines to law enforcement and the military.” [More]

Because who but the “Only Ones” and the standing army should be able to deploy weapons of war against the people they are tasked with securing the Blessings of Liberty for…?

[Via WiscoDave]

A Strategic Advance

Murphy: Gun reform talks won’t include assault weapons ban, ‘comprehensive’ background checks [More]

Those will come later after easier obstacles are hurdled without meaningful opposition. The object is to establish a beachhead without expending too many resources from which they can launch future incursions.

You’d think Republicans would know about D-Day.

[Via Jess]

Framing the Terms

This week will determine if there’s a compromise to be made on Capitol Hill to attempt to prevent gun violence or if this round of talks will end up in an overflowing trash can of failed attempts. [More]

Translation: This week will determine if there’s a betrayal to be made on Capitol Hill to attempt to impose citizen disarmament…

It’s almost like DSM “real reporters” have an agenda or something…

 

Speaking of Disenfranchising Voters

Californians enacted the law by a statewide referendum with the unambiguous language that the sentence “shall be” imprisonment for at least 25 years and that prosecutors “shall plead and prove all known prior serious or violent felony convictions.” Nonetheless, directly and openly flouting that law, Gascon ordered a blanket policy of refusing to enter the prior convictions into the record. [More]

All that talk about “our democracy” is just that.

[Via Michael G]

We’re the Only Ones Silencing Enough

As you’ll see, the most shocking revelation from the interview comes via CBS’s reporter, who relays Gomez’s claim that some unknown officer threatened her with charges of obstruction of justice if she continued speaking out about the cops’ passivity. That would mean jail time for her, as she’s currently on probation for a prior offense. [More]

In the interests of consistency, if priors can terminate recognition of your Second Amendment rights, why should the First be any different?

[Via Michael G]

Verified by MonsterInsights