Category: citizen disarmament

We’re the Only Ones Unflagged Enough

Third Chicago Police Officer Dies By Suicide This Month [More]

We’ve talked for a long time now about how the antis exploit suicide as justification for citizen disarmament, with them conveniently not mentioning that the ones tasked with doing the disarming are a much more at-risk population.

Pritzker wants to empower them to further deny guns to citizens they only have a surface awareness of. Yet here we see colleagues they closely interact with on a daily basis slipping through the cracks and given thin blue line passes.

[Via bondmen]

 

Clear and Present Danger

Illinois governor makes it easier for police to reject gun licenses – The rule change directs Illinois State Police to more broadly use “clear and present danger” reports to deny or revoke Firearm Owner ID cards. [More]

Pig Pritzker channels his inner Gold Hat:

Due process? We ain’t got no due process. We don’t need no due process. I don’t have to show you any stinking due process!

And who better to be the arbiters than the “Only Ones” who say instead of shooting attackers, women should vomit?

Assuming they can still define “woman”…

[Via Jess]

A Commonsense Tyrant Safety Law

Notwithstanding any other law, any person, including an entity, attorney, or law firm, who seeks declaratory or injunctive relief to prevent this state, a political subdivision, a governmental entity or public official in this state, or a person in this state from enforcing any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any other type of law that regulates or restricts firearms, or that represents any litigant seeking that relief, is jointly and severally liable to pay the attorney’s fees and costs of the prevailing party…. Any person, including an entity, attorney, or law firm, who seeks declaratory or injunctive relief as described in subdivision (a), shall not be deemed a prevailing party under this section or any other provision of this chapter. [More]

Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith explains how this will financially intimidate challengers of California citizen disarmament edicts.

[Via Jess]

We’re the Only Ones Alerting Enough

                                                                                                       [More]
About the only thing I have to add to that is this:

The thought strikes: If they don’t downgrade it at least a full letter grade after Bruen, it will be a significant admission.

So: When’s the next “buyback“?

[Via 1Gat]

Arms Race Realities

Black Gun Owners React to Supreme Court’s Concealed Carry Decision [More]

MSN takes a page out of the race hustler playbook to try to make it sound like the problem is with white gun owners.

Funny how they don’t have a designated “Editorial” section and stick crap like this under “News.” You’d think if it actually were, there’d be an unbiased analysis on why some things are happening “disproportionately.”

[Via Remarks]

But No One is Talking About Taking Your Guns…

Not that that would invalidate the right to keep and bear arms…

Any bets on Donald Trump ever giving Thomas Massie the public apology he owes him?

I’ll have more to say on the foolish and subversive  “Active Shooter Alert” — and the foolish and subversive Republicans who appear to be doing their utmost to break up a “red wave — in an article I’m planning to write soon.

[Via Jess]

Will Ricky Martin be Caught Up in Gun Control Net He Helped Cast?

So now, just as with so-called “red flag laws/extreme risk protection orders,” even though he maintains his innocence, Martin could be a “prohibited person.” [More]

What is it about people who want to rape us out of our rights?

Michael Moore’s Proposed 2nd Amendment Repeal: As Impossible As It Is Evil

Make no mistake: His totalitarian position, and that’s exactly what it is, is “Surrender and obey or be destroyed.” His sick ego invites civil war and untold deaths unless his demands are met. [More]

As long as it’s somebody else taking the risks of enforcing the tyranny he demands…

Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing

House Democrats Moving on ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban: Targets at Least 45 Specific AR-15 Rifles [More]

The traitor Cicilline is whoring for media attention again. He introduced it last year and the odds haven’t changed.

Prognosis 2% chance of being enacted according to Skopos Labs (details) [More]

0% chance of being enforced without a civil war.

@$$holes are making noise and not telling us anything we don’t already know– they want our guns.  Don’t lose focus on more immediate threats.

[Via @pamnsc]

Snipe Hunt

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has seen a proliferation of snipers—equipped with a variety of rifles—on both sides. Here, one of the world’s foremost authorities on the subject of military sniping takes a look at the combatants, along with their arms and ammunition. [More]

Most idiot gun-grabbers have no idea what they will unleash here if they keep squeezing.

[Via Jess]

And This Surprises Who?

Today, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray demanding that they cease their attempts to illegally obtain information from local sheriffs on Missourians who have concealed carry permits. Missouri law specifically prohibits the sharing of information on concealed carry permit holders to any entity – local, state, federal, or otherwise. [More]

What, the Trump pick who agreed with Richard Blumenthal on guns?

[Via WiscoDave]

Protection Racket

Weeks after she was denied a protection order, a Michigan woman and her family are dead – A judge denied the order June 27, saying there was insufficient evidence of immediate or irreparable injury. The woman and her family were found dead Sunday, officials said. [More]

The prohibitionists will say this proves the need for “red flag laws.”

Who thinks a piece of paper would have stopped this maniac or prevented him from getting his hands on whatever he wanted for a butchery spree?

Look what they (purposely) didn’t tell us when they report he “bought a gun.”

The only way to prevent such atrocities, proven once more, is to separate the threat from the victim pool. With full due process.

That may not be foolproof? Anybody see any guarantees in life? And a system could be set up that would do that and do a much better job of considering individual circumstances and probabilities than one-size-fits-all prior restraints.

The alternative is denying rights to the innocent. We call governments that do that “tyrannical” for a reason. We’re supposed to accept that because of statistically rare aberrations lawmakers refuse to more effectively address, mostly for political reasons?

[Via Steve T]

Banking on Disarmament

Credit card companies could detect any unusual activity, and submit a suspicious activity report with law enforcement, if needed. This type of activity monitoring would prove to be particularly important, Brown said, in detecting when someone purchases large amounts of weapons, or when someone is buying weapons for somebody that is not legally allowed to do so. [More]

What’s in your gun safe?

[Via Bluesgal]

Verified by MonsterInsights