Category: citizen disarmament

We’re the Young Generation and We’ve Got Something to Say

A new generation of young political leaders is gaining power in the US by using their personal experience with gun violence to push for reforms they say the US is ready for… Pearson’s brother, Timphrance Pearson, died of a self-inflected gunshot wound. It wasn’t his first experience with violent loss; just years before, his mentor Yvonne Nelson and his former classmate Larry Thorn were shot and killed in Memphis. [More]

All these supposed “young Turks” and not an original idea among them…

I’ve been embedded in the issue for longer than some of these people have been alive and have not personally known a single person so affected, making me wonder if it’s more a culture thing than a gun thing.

Noting that Pearson is “a recent gun owner himself” and is still pushing citizen disarmament kind of emphasizes why I maintain new gun buyers is not necessarily cause for the victory celebration so many “gunfluencers” treat it like.

I also note this propaganda piece is filed under “News” and not “opinion,” something to keep in mind when The Guardian pop-up begging for donations appears.

[Via Andy M]

Commiesense Gun Law

New Jersey Senators Push Nationwide Licensing System for Firearm Ownership [More]

Right now there’s no chance this will pass.

Blow the midterms and it could.

But Trump won’t sign it.

But blow the midterms and who knows who the next president will be?

We know what the real goal is, and Democrats will not stop with this infringement. Which means the only thing left could be “I will not comply.”

Remember when “gun rights leaders” used to disparage that? Anybody know if they’ve changed their minds?

Addendum: I don’t know how this happened, but the article IDs Schiff, Padilla and Hirono as Republicans. José Niño typically does excellent work, so perhaps a correction and explanation will be forthcoming.

There Will Be Blood

Dem Rep. Jim Himes tells “MAGA” they better think twice about supporting strikes on drug traffickers because they “need to imagine who gets killed” when AOC is president. “You know, there will be a Democratic president someday…” [More]

More and more Democrats are ginning up the mob. And every one of them want your guns.

What did they go after Trump for, again…?

[Via Michael G]

What Is It They Want Us to Do?

Apparently the defender has a past that disqualifies him from being allowed to defend himself by those absolving themselves of custodial responsibilities. The state’s answer is clear and brief.

Be nice if there were some way citizens under similar forced disability knew what the rules were to get recognition of their rights back…

Method to the Madness

Good thing none of this has anything to do with that “single issue“!

[Via Michael G]

Switch Positions

Instead of a stocking filled with joy, Trump’s Department of Justice dumped lumps of coal in Knife Rights’ stocking with their disappointing response brief continuing their Biden-like anti-Second Amendment stance defending the unconstitutional Federal Switchblade Act. Despite the administration’s lukewarm Second Amendment support in some firearms cases, Trump’s DOJ still hasn’t got the memo that “shall not be infringed” means exactly that. This administration supports the Second Amendment with one hand but attempts to strip it with the other. [More]

So… it’s not just guns they’re bipolar about.

By Denying Information in FOIA Request, Pirro and DOJ Refuse to Define Restoration of Rights Eligibility

DOJ, despite publicizing its championing of rights restoration, officially disagrees. [More]

“What do we have to do to be considered?” seems a simple enough question gun owners who put this administration in office deserve an answer to.

We’re the Only Ones Detailed Enough

Manhattan D.A. Claims Lawful Carry is ‘Dangerous’ and ‘Disruptive’ Conduct [More]

I guess that depends on the conduct being disrupted.

Besides, he’s got his.

Funny, how that works.

Prosecutors against guns. How original.

[Via Michael G]

Closed-Minded

openmindedseptic

Folks who advocate for legalized guns never seen to take into account the effect that guns have ion others who are not using, like children who are dependents. They never calculate the cost to families, or even the public. The cost of homeless, much of which is due to addiction to guns, imposes a cost not just on users, but on everyone else. Cost of healthcare, housing, crimes committed, etc., due to guns, affect society, not just users. [More]

You convinced me! Where do I turn ’em in?

Penn/Swalwell Movie Flap Raises Questions of Consistency, Integrity, and Loyalty

“‘Workers of the world unite’ — unless it affects our bottom line?” [More]

Do union members labor under the illusion that career leftists are interested in championing them? What about gun owning union members?