Help Wanted, Inquire Within

[L]eftist and former NC Supreme Court Chief Justice Cheri Beasley, if elected to the U.S. Senate, has admitted she would “be the 51st vote to end the filibuster…” And if Beasley is allowed to cast a vote ending the filibuster, the ban on semi-automatic firearms Democrats have been trying to pass, as well as universal gun registration (aka “universal background checks”) will become law shortly thereafter. [More]

So what will NC gun owners do about that?

I Have Some Good News and Some Bad News

Defendant’s motion hinges on the constitutionality of § 922(n) because if the provision is unconstitutional, then Defendant’s false statement during the purchase of the firearm is immaterial. [More]

So if that stands, will it moot any Hunter Biden complaint for lying on the 4473?

[Via Robert J]

Related UPDATE

People under felony indictment can’t be barred from purchasing guns, judge rules [More]

I gotta wonder if the judge is trying to force an outraged demand for legislative action here and if all the high-fiving about how significant this is may turn out to be premature. He was nominated by Trump but also nominated for an earlier position by Obama.

[Via Remarks]

What If You Mustered the Militia and No One Came?


This has been out for three weeks and only has 811 views to date on YouTube…? Is that indicative of the interest Oregon gun owners have in being informed, let alone involved?

And according to Oregon Firearms Federation:

With the media in the tank for them, they will not have to spend much on spreading their message, while we have been forced to spend a lot. An excellent video produced for us is being denied digital distribution because it “involves guns.” Of course it does. It’s a gun ban ballot measure!

I wish I could believe that Oregon gun owners who won’t lift a finger to do the easy things now are ready, willing, and able to do the hard ones later. How pathetic that a guy in Ohio does more to share advocacy information than most of them, and has for years.

And it’s not just them.

In the Days Before ‘Commonsense Gun Safety’…

“Possibly you’re old enough to remember the great massacre spree of 1964? … And all because, in its infinite stupidity, the U.S. Government dumped 240,000 high-capacity .30-caliber assault rifles into an otherwise innocent America.” Remember when that happened? No? Me neither, despite being a historian. That’s because it didn’t happen, despite hundreds of thousands of M-1 Carbines being dumped on an unsuspecting public in 1963 for less than a hundred bucks apiece. NRA members could buy them for a 20-dollar bill. No background check either. [More]

Ah, “progress.”

[H/T Wirecutter]

With Republicans Like These

The Federal Assault Weapons Licensing Act, debuted by U.S. Rep. Chris Jacobs (D-NY) on Monday, would create a scheme for any American seeking to legally purchase most new semi-auto rifles, shotguns, or pistols that would require the government to first sign off on the acquisition. [More]

Wrong, Guns.com. He’s an NRA-endorsed Republican and one of the usual suspects. And registration is just the first step toward this lying sack’s real goal.

He’s figured he can’t run again with this level of betrayal, so this is his parting shot at doing as much destruction as possible.  GovTrack doesn’t have a prognosis yet, but my guess is it has less than a 1% chance at passage if the GOP doesn’t blow the “red wave.”

Where does the party find subversive whores like this?

[Via Jess]

Holding Out for More

On Wednesday, U.S. Senator Ted Cruz went to the Senate floor to seek unanimous consent for his proposed school safety bill, but it was blocked. Senator Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, objected to the Cruz legislation and criticized him for not being serious. [More]

That means it doesn’t ban guns, so he’d rather more children be slaughtered until he gets a bill that does.

[Via Jess]

Convenience Store Clerk’s Execution Shows Danger of ‘Giving Robbers What They Want’

They’re forbidden to have the means of defense. Instead, those who demand they stay this way offer useless advice guaranteed to leave them at the mercy of those who have none: “Give them what they want.” [More]

The question must be asked: “What if what they want is your life?”

As Good a Reason to Disarm You and Me as Any

Little told police that Straughter had put a gun on a television stand the night before and that the gun would have been within the boy’s reach, charges said. She also said she knew the gun was there and that neither she nor Straughter moved it. [More]

I can’t tell you how many times feral sons Uday and Qusay were exposed to that exact same situation growing up.

[Via bondmen]

Meanwhile, Over at the Cult of Death…

Texas A&M Promotes ‘Self-Managed Abortion’ Event to Students [More]

As regulars here know, there have been a few times in the past month where various personal priorities have kept me from posting here for a day or so. One of those priorities was the birth of my first grandchild, a beautiful and healthy little girl, four weeks ago today.

Her birth was premature, by six weeks, and she was in the NICU until recently.  She’s actually still not even “scheduled” to be born until nine days from now, which I guess makes her fair game for childless Stacey Abrams and communion-taking Catholics Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi.

There is no question she is a human being, and that the taking of her life, if she had not come early, would have been an act of premeditated murder. There is also no question that the development of her nervous system would make the “procedure” an act of agonizing medieval torture rivaling the disembowelment and drawing and quartering of William Wallace.

Oh, and there is also no question that she is a female.

I guess the only question I have left is since the people doing this are overwhelmingly the ones enabling those who would disarm and rule or kill me and mine if they could, why should I care if they wish to cull their next generations of voters?

[Original story I riffed off of submitted by Michael G]

Verified by MonsterInsights