BREAKING 2A NEWS: MAJOR ORAL ARGUMENT ABOUT GUNS ON PUBLIC TRANSIT!!!

The Federal Appeals Court for the 7th circuit heard an oral argument about gun free zones and whether they are constitutional under the 2nd Amendment. [Watch]

Of course they’re not. “Shall not be infringed,” remember?

Which doesn’t mean this won’t go on for years and end up in front of a deliberately indifferent a Supreme Court that denies cert.

Forgive me if the whole Snope deal has soured me on hyperbolic video titles.

[Via Jess]

And NOW What?

GOA & GOF File for Summary Judgment to Overturn Florida’s Open Carry Ban [More]

’bout damn time. Before someone gets killed.

So, will Uthmeier and DeSantis stand down, like they did with a challenge to the under 21 long gun ban, or fight, and in any case, all the Supreme Court has to do to keep the prohibition in place is something they’ve proven very adept at: Nothing.

‘Nuns Against Guns’ Campaign Taking Advantage of Tax Exemption to Stump for Nationwide ‘Gun Control’

It’s not out of line to wonder who’s paying for all this and why. [More]

There are idiots, there are useful idiots, and there are Marxist “sisters” seemingly immune to 501(c)(3) restrictions on lobbying… Hey, if you see something, say something.

So: When are those embedding spirititual wickedness in high places going to demand habits for biological males?

Police Responses to Florida Open Carriers Show Need for Direction from DeSantis

There is something that is in DeSantis’ power to do that can mitigate that danger without having to rely on oath-breaking Republican power players… [More]

One simple, proactive order that is within the governor’s power to issue could minimize the chances of lawful open carriers being endangered by police ignorance of the law.

War in Heaven

He’s basically following the increment agenda.

Before uncorking the champagne and anticipating midterm bliss, remember how intractably stupid most Democrat voters are. They’ll still come out against Republicans.

And while he may have screwed his own pooch, it’s not like his follower are exactly rational, and won’t dig in and double down. He may get booted from an official Party position, but don’t look for his influence to go away.

[Via several of you]

No Country for Men

I thought you guys were trying to fake men into thinking you suddenly grokked them

Instead, you’re out there spooking the herd by showing them an open borders hypochondriac spokesmodel who is scared of guns, scared of cars, incompetent at life, obsessed with AIDS movies, and fantasizes that if he were gay, he would “get married tomorrow, just to f*** with the church.”

Come to think of it, that pretty much describes anyone dumb enough to vote for you.

[Via WiscoDave]

It Can Never Happen Here?

“Lol you probably would have to actually genocide white people to make this a normal country,” Rodriguez wrote in one message, according to Klippenstein. “Like even a very targeted and selective rehabilitation program would probably have to lead to the lifetime imprisonments of tens of millions of white people.” [More]

Obviously we’re the Nazis…

Anybody think I wasn’t dead serious?

These domestic enemies exist. They want us disarmed. They want us dead.

Ironically, ultimately we’re what keeps useful idiots enabling them from the lime pits.

[Via Michael G]

That Explains It

From Rep. Paul Gosar to a constituent via email:

Reconciliation is a procedure under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, where Congress implements budget resolution policies that are required to be related to permanent spending and revenue programs. Additionally, the Byrd rule, which was incorporated into the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, prohibits provisions that are “extraneous to the purpose of implementing budget resolution policies.” Consequently, provisions in a reconciliation bill cannot include policy changes that do not affect the budget or spending programs.

Consequently, this is why the full versions of the SHORT and Hearing Protection Act were not included in the bill, as the portions that affect non-tax provisions of the National Firearms Act (NFA) violate the Byrd rule.

Per the recipient:

“Now the only thing I need to figure out is how they managed to pass a bill out of the House that removed both the tax AND the registration. If you have any news on that, it sure would be worth a blog post.”

I don’t. How about you? And why not do the same with SBRs?

Chinese Coil Gun Could Prove Fatal Flaw in ‘Common Use’ Argument

Since no innovation ever begins “in common use,” a government with the power to do so can ban all new weapon developments from those they would rule, retaining them exclusively for itself. [More]

Sorry, you can’t have one. Hey, it’s your “gun rights leaders” who embraced the “in common use” litmus test we’re using to deny you.

A Modest Proposal

The NFA is constitutional because it’s “a modest burden” and not a ban [More]

The Second Amendment does not say “shall not be banned.” It says “shall not be infringed.” Even modestly.

Unless you’re one of the “smartest people in the room” who buy into the Trump/Bondi DOJ is playing super secret 3D chess with court rules that they can’t tell us about, and it will all work out in the end, honest…

Then ask why they’re not pushing SBRs.

Glock Watchers

Democratic lawmakers are trying to make gun laws even harder in New York, including the sale of Glock brand firearms. Legislation passed a senate committee to ban the sale of pistol converters and convertible pistols. The legislation hones in on the firearm brand Glock because the design is easily manipulated. [More]

Zellnor Myrie. Good grief, Democrats are dumb.

Think Glock’ll pull a Barrett?

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights