Notes from the Resistance
David Hogg: Trump Is a ‘Damn Coward’ For Not Changing Gun Laws [More]
Says the loudmouth who expects others to do his confiscations for him.
He doesn’t understand separation of powers, does he, not that any branch doing it would result in what they expect.
And this is CNN.
[Via bondmen]
Ohio officials are reminding educational, religious and nonprofit institutions across the state to consider a range of safety-related resources and funding opportunities. [More]
No, of course the one thing that will work isn’t included.
[Via JG]
Democratic lawmakers propose campus gun ban to improve safety at Wisconsin colleges [More]
Because nothing says “No Predators Allowed” like Gun-Free Zones!
I don’t suppose Wisconsin Democrats would also require these and have the Party indemnify schools found liable to pay out?
I guess we could ask Kelda…
[Via Mike F]
And if what they want is you…?
At first I thought I’d posted on this already, but when I checked saw that was just a parroted talking point.
[Via WiscoDave]
An officer should respect your right to legally carry — but what happens when he gets antsy and gets aggressive with you? In that moment, your heart’s racing, your hands are frozen, and you’re trying to decide if telling him you’re armed will calm him down or make things worse. [Watch]
Yeah, why don’t you consider his feelings for a change?
[Via Jess]
‘Tone-deaf’ protesters heckle Vance outside Minneapolis church shooting site [More]
I don’t see anybody in the photo of loser protesters who want our guns who looks like they could take them.
Lawsuit: Seattle sues Glock over handguns that can be turned into machine guns [More]
So getting in bed with grabbers doesn’t result in affection and respect?
[Via Jess]
Why Has Fort Worth – One of America’s Most Conservative Cities – Hired an Anti-Gun Police Chief? [More]
I’d start by looking at who “Republican” Mayor Mattie Parker joins with “to put aside partisan differences and pass common sense gun safety legislation.”
[Via Michael G]
[T]he 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has found that machine guns are not protected under the Second Amendment with really a terribly reasoned ruling. But the outcome is the one we want because, as I’ve explained to you before, unequivocally, 100% we 1,000% do not want a machine gun case to go to the United States Supreme Court. Anyone that disagrees with me is 1,000% wrong. If a machine gun case goes to the Supreme Court, we will 1,000% lose, which will create more bad Second Amendment precedent. And it will also delay, as an opportunity cost the decision that AR-15s and semi-automatic rifles are protected arms under the Second Amendment… [Watch]
The fact that his legal read on this is correct should be all the proof we need that the court benches are dominated by traitors.
[Via Jess]
Following its amicus brief in support of us, the federal government has asked the Seventh Circuit for approval to participate in oral arguments in our lawsuit challenging Illinois’ “assault weapon” and magazine bans [More]
How could they refuse? After all, “Currently, six of the court’s judges were appointed by Republicans and five by Democrats.”
Yeah, but one of those “Republicans” is treasonous dotard Frank Easterbrook…
[Via Jess]
Deadly triple shooting at apartment complex stemmed from robbery, Sacramento sheriff says… The sheriff’s office said all four men involved in the shooting had prior felony convictions and were prohibited from possessing guns. [More]
Being on probation with an ankle monitor was a nice touch.
And yeah, he absolutely had a right to defend himself. If they all had been in custodial care where they belong, guns would not have been part of the equation.
Why is it I get the feeling the goal isn’t really to reduce “gun violence”?
[Via DL]
Democrat Arizona Rep. Yassamin Ansari Calls Illegal Aliens Her ‘Constituents’ [More]
I still want to find out how this miserable ingrate can legally block feedback on a public policy post affecting all our rights from her legal constituents.
[Via JG]
Walz to call special session on gun control, propose assault weapons ban [More]
What lies must he have told NRA to get its endorsement? Apparently he didn’t have to, since his “unwavering pro-gun support” was based on “sportsmen” and “rich hunting heritage.”
[Via Jess]
That Kinzinger is evidently unaware of this (or aware but deliberately lying by omission about it) is no surprise. [More]
Photo caption contest winner: How you can tell Adam Kinzinger is lying.
A Delaware state court struck down the state’s ban on firearms ownership for adults between the ages of 18 and 21, citing the obvious conclusion that such a ban is unconstitutional, just as it would be for any other enumerated right. However, the opinion is wrought with other areas of concern that show the court’s hostility towards Second Amendment rights. [More]
[Via Michael G]
