Category: citizen disarmament

The Finest Tyranny Money Can Buy

Says the guy who’s so rich and connected his armed bodyguards can ignore foreign disarmament edicts when he travels…

Did someone say “pitchforks“?

Aren’t they the weapon of choice in hell?

Just When You Thought You’d Read the Stupidest Thing on the Internet…

Just I thought Mazie Hirono had claimed the prize…

You overprivileged lefties are free to leave any time you want — but you keep breaking your promises.

Since all she does is lie, why wouldn’t we believe she lied for Monsanto?

Who Will Guard the Guardians?

Guardian Angels resume NYC subway patrols for first time since 2020 after shocking arson murder [More]

Pinkley’s question comes to mind.

Followed by “With what?”

How worthy of protection are people who vote for their own disarmament and then expect other men, also disarmed by the edicts they demand, to save them?

[Via Jess]

Cut and Run

What was the first clue that this person is mentally ill? And if someone has proven they can’t be trusted with a knife, what the hell are they doing out?

It’s Only ‘Commonsense’

Now, in the closing chapter of Schmidt’s journey from judicial infamy to political ignominy, he has chosen to flip off Portland voters by attempting to illegally set up early releases for a rogue’s gallery of murderers, rapists, and thugs. [More]

So naturally he was endorsed by the more disarmed victims lobby:

[Via Michael G]

Speaking of Missing the Barn…

AN ACT Relating to protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers [More]

Go after the people whose livlihoods already depend on proving — on demand — that they comply with the law… really?

[Via Jess]

Today’s Five-Minute Activism

On the way back from my routine doctor visit my wife and I stopped in at the supermarket to pick up dinner fixings for tonight ( I make a very good Italian sausage and peppers if I say so myself), and one of the things I usually check is the magazine stand to see if the new issue of Firearms News is on display yet.

Someone moved magazines from other sections and placed them to cover most of the gun mags. It’s not the first time I’ve noticed and set things right.

I can just imagine the bitter, self-righteous, indignant type that has no clue what this says about her as a human being, and instead perversely justifies this to herself and other frustrated cud chewers. And yeah, I just made assumptions drawing on stereotypes. Change my mind.

The thought strikes: In addition to the other resolutions, why not make a point of checking when you’re in the store and setting things right?

Clueless Morons Make Noise About Guns

Gun violence prevention group speaks on deadly Ferguson gun battle [More]

Did they say anything worth listening to?

And they don’t think the admission of “generational poverty” in a land of “free” K-12 education, available jobs, and a universal understanding of how babies are made reflects on their ability to make competent decisions…?

[Via bondmen]

With Republicans Like These

Trump hails Florida Dem’s decision to ditch party, join GOP [More]

I’m trying to figure out how including this cow who has pledged to “stand up to the NRA and fight for a ban on military style assault rifles and the high capacity ammunition that make them so lethal” will help…

Anybody else getting a Professor Harold Hill of politics vibe…?

[Via Andy M]

Shall Not Be Infringed Unless…

We learned that the denials were due to font sizes that were too small, the lack of compliant visual indicators, and so forth. We have just received additional responsive documents from the DOJ which explain their position that, pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, the explanatory text for the CLIs must be permanently displayed by engraving, stamping, etching, molding, casting, or other means of permanent marking. If the explanatory text can be removed, such as with acetone, that will NOT be sufficient for roster approval. [More]

Now they’re just being d!cks.

This is one of the things we ought to be pressing Trump on:

Imagine now the Department of Justice under an actual Second Amendment advocate, and what it could do fighting infringements and prohibitionist lawfare waged by states with unlimited tax war chests in tandem with Astroturf prohibitionist groups funded by antigun elites. Right now, the costs to defend against these innumerable assaults on all levels are borne by gun rights groups and members of mostly modest means who can only support a fraction of what is needed. That equation could be turned on its head.

That presupposes Pam Bondi’s inclination to demand infringements can be reined in and reversed.

[Via Jess]

Speaking of Racial Disenfranchisement…

His research indicates that an overwhelming majority of initial denials, approximately 99%, are errors, disproportionately affecting Hispanic and Black males due to phonetic similarities in names within racial groups. [More]

Yes, we get it. We’ve gotten it for a long time. Gun control is racist.

So, when are self-annointed “black leaders” going to stop being self-serving sellouts to the Democrat machine, and when will its patronizing white politicians, “authorized journalists,” and assorted prohibitionists start being condemned for the insufferable bigots that they are?

Verified by MonsterInsights