Category: DGU

An Inconvenient Truth

CPRC Study: Concealed Carriers Stop More Active Shooter Cases Than Police [More]

You can review the data and the methodology for yourself.

Gun-grabbers would rather the citizens who stopped aggressors had been unarmed and that the attackers had succeeded so they could dance in the blood and demand more.

[Via WiscoDave]

Once a Task is Just Begun, Never Leave it ’til it’s Done

Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor & Richard Hayes discuss the major changes in self-defense law and how new legislation could shield gun owners from civil lawsuits after a justified use of force. If these laws pass, could it mean an end to financially devastating lawsuits for self-defenders? [More]

“If…”

[Via Jess]

Violence Never Solves Anything?

But some experts say there are simply too many lions in some places, many of which have lost their fear of humans, and treeing and freeing doesn’t go far enough. “They need hunting,” said John Chandler, the professional El Dorado County trapper who caught the lion that attacked Brooks’ nephews. “It solves everything.” [More]

Human victims made possible by citizen disarming Democrats and other humanity traitors like those at the Center for Biological Diversity who prioritize wild animals of all species above human lives.

[Via Michael G]

What Do You Need an ‘Assault Weapon’ For?

Chilling surveillance footage showed one of the club’s security guards – who appeared to be wearing body armor – calmly raising his weapon as he steps in front of cowering clubgoers diving to the ground below. [More]

“Commonsense gun safety advocates” would rather he and the sheep he protected had been slaughtered.

[Via bondmen]

Babe in Arms

Mother With Baby on Hip Gets in Shootout With Alleged Intruders [More]

Reasons why Moms Demand Action bleaters would rather she had been unarmed and killed:

  • A successful DGU contradicts everything they stand for.
  • They want people to believe a gun in the home endangers all women.
  • If the invaders had killed her with guns, the Moms have been able to point to another “victim of gun violence” — maybe two, if they were “lucky.”

Oh well, maybe someone can salvage something out of this and make a case for child endangerment…

[Via Lane]

A Good Shoot?

The man accused of murder in the shooting death of a gay man at a Tampa dog park last year was acquitted on Thursday. After deliberating for about 2½ hours, a six-person jury found that Gerald Declan Radford did not commit second-degree murder when he shot John Walter Lay at the West Dog Park last year. [More]

It turns out he’d rejected a plea deal.

The whole thing seems to have been so avoidable. Stupid prideful teenagers escalating with words and duking it out I can understand having been one myself once, but grown and supposedly mature men…? Applying the same standard of conduct I do to myself, you walk away when you can, especially when armed.

I’m glad I don’t have this on my conscience.

[Via Edmund M]

Putting the Wild in Wildfires

Animals fleeing the California fires are seeking refuge in residential areas, having been displaced from their natural habitats in the mountains and hills. [More]

Then thank goodness for Giffords “trailblazers”!

[Via Edmund M]

Tangentially-Related UPDATE

Those aren’t the only predators.

Seems as plausible an explanation as any…

[Via WiscoDave]

Moment in the Spotlight

Should you intervene in a mass attack? Is defending a third person legally different from defending yourself? Do you have a duty to retreat in these situations? And what practical considerations should you weigh, like your physical safety and the chaos of multiple 911 calls? Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss whether you should stop a mass attack, the legal and practical risks of defending others, and how to protect yourself responsibly in high-threat situations. [More]

Having time to think about it, my inner Rick Blaine wins. Responsible people make their own preparations and irresponsible ones disparage armed citizens.

Without having time to reflect, I suppose the unique situation itself would steer my decision and repercussions would be the last thing on my mind. I know from past experience where I felt the end was near my instincts have been to focus and act, not freeze, and do my shaking afterward.

[Via Jess]

This is CNN

CNN Tries and Fails – Again – to Make Florida’s Stand Your Ground Law Controversial [More]

So a 42-year-old with a violent criminal history threatens an armed 79-year-old with a chainsaw, who responds appropriately, and that’s reason to disparage”Stand Y0ur Ground”?

The only thing controversial is why anyone still watches CNN.

Tangentially-related UPDATE

Or that more people don’t sue…

[Via Michael G]

Home Defense-Free Zone

Homeowners in Irving initially came up with the idea of shooting and killing the pigs, but then realized they should not be firing a gun at the animals in a suburban neighborhood. “My first thought was, like, well, I can go shoot them,” Mendez said. “But I’m like, yeah, I’m in a neighborhood. I can’t just go out there and start blasting.” [More]

No, not just “blasting,” but then again, what qualified hunter would characterize it that way? Would he say the same thing if it was a feral human threatening him, and settle for “slingshots and clapping two pieces of wood”?

As long as Cooper’s rules are adhered to, what’s the problem? Who died and made this guy the arbiter of appropriate responses to be selected for national amplification?

Wolf at the Door

Colton Lexus, 30, was arrested Wednesday night after allegedly shooting a man who was kicking his apartment door in the Back of the Yards neighborhood. [More]

Why? That’s a pretty deranged, aggressive and scary action, and it seems a pretty reasonable assumption that if the kicker had succeeded he’d have been a danger to those he could now reach.

Besides, the resident was just following the recognized Gun Safety President’s expert home defense advice.

[Via bondmen]

The Worst Defense is a Bad Offense

Yet Gannon’s defense attorney, Stephen Colella, described Hayes as “someone who, allegedly attending a peaceful rally, saw fit to bring a semiautomatic weapon and 20 rounds, and a person who has, in fact, attended similar rallies in the past similarly armed”… [More]

Yeah, to keep hotheaded lunatics like your 32-year-old buttwad client from attacking his 47-year-old target peaceably exercising his First and Second Amendment recognized rights with potentially lethal force.

This you, Stephen…? I ask not just because of the rather unique name and the same state, but also because of similar seedily manipulative approaches to the law…

[Via Edmund M]

Verified by MonsterInsights