Notes from the Resistance
The Supreme Court on Tuesday sent a challenge to a Pennsylvania law barring people 18- to 20-years-old from carrying guns back to the lower courts for another look in light of last term’s decision in United States v. Rahimi, in which the justices attempted to provide guidance for courts reviewing Second Amendment challenges to restrictions on gun rights. [More]
I know the wheels of justice grind slowly and we have procedures for a reason, but come on...
[Via Jess]
What does it say about opponents when all they reply with are ad hominem attacks and inane, cognitively dissonant declarations like “All of you who are crying for Voter IDs… it is nothing more than a PLOY for Maga and Trump to claim ‘VOTER FRAUD’ after Kamala Harris has won the election LEGITIMATELY.”
This is not the first time Justice Barrett has departed from conservative views on the Second Amendment, values she represented herself as a staunch supporter of when she was nominated to the Supreme Court by then President Donald Trump. [More]
Except she didn’t, the gun groups did.
As with all SCOTUS confirmation hearings, they don’t ask the tough questions needed to elicit unequivocal answers.
As noted when cautioning against rubber stamping Gorsuch:
Typically in judicial confirmation hearings, nominees have been able to rely on an “out” giving them a pass on answering specific questions… Think of one job you’ve ever applied for where you’d have gotten it if you decided to play coy with the hiring managers. While it may be “inappropriate” for a judge to weigh in on a specific case before confirmation — for legitimate reasons, including not having studied and evaluated all the particulars, evidence and precedents against the “supreme Law of the Land,” — there’s no reason why general principles of understanding should be off-limits. Such hearings are supposed to be, among other things, high-level employment interviews, not pre-coronation ceremonies.
Gun owners may be paying the price for that… again.
This short video reveals the dark-money activists from outside Ohio, some from other countries, who want to seize power and rig Ohio elections to elect partisan leftists even in conservative parts of the state. [More]
If you’re an Ohio gun owner who cares about the Second Amendment, or if you know one, spread the word.
Biden’s executive order targets modern manufacturing processes in ways that implicate the First Amendment. [More]
So if Democrats want to ban “misinformation” and now real information, what kind of information will still be “legal”?
The good thing is, the First Amendment says “Congress shall make no law…”
They’re not making it. The executive is!
[More]
Hey, they have to make sure they can get away with it…
And somebody’s gotta bring the F-15s…
UPDATE
Added context, received via email:
The facts present a scenario and probabilities that indicate:
If stealing the election is not possible (read that too large of margin) and Trump wins the the general election, Many democrats have already stated the will NOT allow the electoral college vote to be certified (14 amendment).
They will try to force congress to vote per the constitution 13th amendment (which requires they only can vote for the top three electoral college vote recipients).
Only Trump and Harris will have ANY electoral votes…Meaning they plan on forcing a vote for Harris.
Unless the republicans walk and don’t allow a quorum to be called that is what will happen.
No quorum, then Vance will be “Acting” president until things are sorted out.
Now weave into this mess that all info that establishment does not like is “misinformation” and all folks who refuse to accept this scenario will be called a either an insurrectionist or a domestic terrorist.
NOW; RE-read the DOD memo granting themselves the right to use lethal force….
Get the picture?
[More]
The ever subversive Matt Drudge continues making unreported in kind campaign contributions to the Democrat/Harris/Walz campaign, this time joining forces with “conservative” Matt Labash.
Do they believe we’ll ever vote for Vichycons if they sabotage MAGA or are they really just clandestine Democrat operatives?
And the truth of the matter is, Republicans need gun owners more than we need them. [More]
When it comes to the Second Amendment, every damn one of these characters can’t resist distancing themselves and showing the media what a big “but” they have.
My wife’s brother passed away recently and we will be hosting out-of-state family and friends for a memorial service today.
Rest in peace, Robert. You were a remarkable man. We loved you and carry your memory in our hearts.
I am taking the day off.
One murder with @ 5M members at the time? Is there a more peaceable population on the planet?
Last night, I was given a statement from the victim of Tim Walz to release this morning. [More]
Vs.
Anyone blindly believing this, is retarded. [More]
I agree.
What about people who blindly discourage investigating such a serious criminal accusation leveled against a powerful politician?
It’s no secret I could not be more against Walz. I think if he and Kamala are elected it’s an existential threat to peaceable means of redress for Second Amendment advocates. With that being said, I thought Community Notes existed for just such posts as these.
I understand not dignifying a “Have you stopped beating your wife?” loaded question and helping draw attention to it. Still, this has the potential to impact election results, and if I don’t object to them doing this to Walz I can’t object to them doing this to anyone, including me.
As a proponent of “Red Flag Laws,” Walz is all for you and me having to prove OUR innocence if accused of something the government will disarm us over without being convicted of anything. But that still doesn’t make it right for anyone to demand he prove HIS innocence: The burden of proving guilt is on the state.
FEC and DOJ should be the ones investigating this. If it turns out to be a malicious lie being spread in an attempt at election interference, that’s prosecutable, especially if more than one person is involved. So is if the accusations turn out to have substance.
If you see something say something, right?
[Via WiscoDave]
If they do find any, I wonder what percent will be embedded feds…
If they can’t provoke the low-hanging fruit, they need to find some other way to conflate them with us.
[Via WiscoDave]
“People like me who like to hunt and who love guns, it’s sad almost to watch them get cut up,” said volunteer Dan Krull. “But we are going to support this sort of thing because it is symbolic and sends a message like, ‘Look we need to do something.’” [More]
You’re a real genius, aren’t you, gunkapo Fudd Dan?
So: Who was the FFL who processed the transfers?
Or was this another one of these?
[Via Steve T]
The face diapers work as well as his “gun laws.” How’d they let the one guy in without one?
Let’s be clear. Allowing Trump to hold an event at MSG is equivalent to the infamous Nazis rally at Madison Square Garden on February 20, 1939 [More]
That may be you he’s talking about.
Solid blue district Democrats don’t even try to hide their Antifa affinities.
Or that they want your guns.
‘They Brought Their Country with Them’: Cindy Romero on ‘Terror’ of Living in Venezuelan Gang-Run Apartment [More]
Martha Raddatz says it’s no big deal.
[Via bondmen]
Che Guevara and Víctor Dreke in the African Congo [More]
Miguel A. Faria, M.D., gives us a recent history lesson on communist “revolutionary” savagery and incompetence, excerpted from his book “Cuba’s Eternal Revolution through the Prism of Insurgency, Socialism, and Espionage.”
My own thoughts go to those importing this here.
Cobb County Sheriff called deputies for help after Burger King got his order wrong [More]
Really? Not a single negative comment?
He can’t erase them from Twitter.
So is the “law enforcer” breaking the law?
Shall we see if this stays up?
[Via Jess]
