Saying No to Cartel-Sanctioned Lawfare

The Second Amendment Foundation has filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of Smith & Wesson in its legal fight against the government of Mexico, which seeks to hold the American gun manufacturer liable for criminal acts of third parties in Mexico. [More]

Yes, real threats from the open border directly impact the “single issue” in more ways than one.

Everyone realizes the government there would not exist without cartel sanction? A loyal American State Department would have Obrador on the carpet begging us not to cut back on trade and handout benefits.

You Talkin’ to Me?

“Are you raising your eyebrows at me?” Merchan shouted at Costello. “Were you staring at me?” He sounded like a paranoid schizophrenic. A nut on the street. The psychopath in the movie Taxi Driver. [More]

Is anyone under the illusion he’s anything but a Democrat apparatchik?

One critique: The way this is presented with the byline “By James,” it’s not clear if this is his voice or Dershowitz’s…

[Via bondmen]

Aid and Comfort

This is my shocked face.

[Via Michael G]

The Gift That Keeps On Giving

Hundreds of Fast and Furious firearms have previously been traced to other shootings in Mexico. The new leak indicates hundreds more are still being found. [More]

So change the subject by trying to blame major gun retailers in an attempt to do the same thing the original plot tried to do: Enact more infringements.

I may do more on this.

[Via several of you]

Missing in Action

SCOTUS urged to hear Mexico’s lawsuit blaming US gun makers for cartel violence – GOP AGs say ‘anti-gun activists’ trying to blame US gun manufacturers for Mexico’s bad policy choices [More]

Once more I see my guy, Dave Yost, AWOL

And once more I’ll ask him why.

[Via Jess]

None Dare Call It Treason

It would specifically ban civilian use of armor that meets or exceeds Level 3 ballistic resistance, which protects against rifle ammunition. The proposed legislation only seeks to enforce civilian usage while allowing military and police personnel to use the armor. [More]

The violence monopolists want the state to be able to disarm you and to kill you.

[Via Jess]

Risky Business

The short version is that Oberlin College asserted that the insurers wrongfully refused to settle the case prior to trial, blaming the insurers not the college for the ultimate trial debacle… [More]

I’m surprised anyone will still insure them. Those companies are quick enough to cancel gun owners.

I’ve been following Oberlin happenings for a while, and for a while before that.

Coincidentally, guess what I just happen to be wearing right now, seriously, not staged or I’d have done my hair:

And as long as we’re on the subject of insurance claims, let me introduce you to one of my guilty entertainment pleasures

[Via Michael G]

Proving a Negative

Received via email from WarOnGuns Correspondent Scott J:

Nearly every time the “news” tells you about a car wreck fatality, they tell you “they were not wearing a seat belt”.

Why don’t they tell you every time a person is attacked and killed, “they were not carrying a gun”?

That presumes it’s “news.”

Speaking Volumes

“It speaks to guns in America,” said Chester Mayor Stefan Roots, who said his small city has enjoyed a period of relative calm in recent years, with violent crime on the decline. “Violence is always unpredictable. We don’t know what conditions people are under, in a city that’s impoverished like ours.” [More]

Actually, Stefan, it speaks to incompetent Democrat rule. It speaks to people who would elect a collectivist dolt you.

[Via Jess]

How Can You Tell Scott Jackson’s Lying?

Judge Upholds Arkansas Town’s Bid to Block Gun Store From Opening [More]

Something for everyone,” eh?

Looks like one of those artsy, trendy tourist traps ruled over by well-heeled, rope-selling useful idiots who have no idea what’s in store for the bourgeoisie

“Our kind” need not apply.

Scott’s on a different mission.

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights