Notes from the Resistance
It’s fair to ask how, in anyone’s universe, such conduct would not be grounds for removal from the court, disbarment from the practice of law, and criminal prosecution. [More]
Do radical Democrat prohibitionists really want to tell tens of millions of gun owners that the courts are no longer available to them to seek redress against infringements of their fundamental rights?
Nice to see the Pence Vichycon Troye screwing things up worse than the ineffectual Littman. [More]
Citing HuffPo to justify citizen disarmament really shows the new girl for what she is.
I wonder when these “influencers” are going to start distancing themselves…
So much for “the supreme Law of the Land”…
The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a federal lawsuit against the Cortland, N.Y. Housing Authority, alleging Second Amendment violations by prohibiting tenants from possessing firearms on CHA premises. [More]
A few years back I found one in Ohio that does that, but I’m not a lawyer and don’t know anyone who lives there to see if they want to be a plaintiff:
Also from SAF:
A federal appeals court has struck down a New York state law requiring private property owners to post signs allowing concealed carry on property open to the public as part of a massive decision dealing with several separate challenges of the Empire State’s post-Bruen gun control legislation. [More]
Huh. Second Circuit did something right in all its wrong…
Mark Walters just called and asked me to join him on air this afternoon at 4 Eastern to talk about all the goings-on in the gun world.
Whatever will we find to talk about?
You know the drill: AAR website to listen/watch/find a station.
You misspelled “assault,” morons.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Hank Johnson reintroduce bill with emphasis on gun violence prevention [More]
Are you really ignorant enough to believe that’s what this will do, “real reporter” Jennifer Gerson?
“And I’s“…?
Here are the Democrat politicians who want us dead.
But no one’s talking about taking your guns.
“0% chance“…?
Now all we’ve got to do is see if the House Republicans are going to implode, because they’ve already got their share of gun-grabbing traitors.
[Via Jess]
Much like Missouri state lawmakers used a so-called trigger law to ban abortion, St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones has now signed a trigger law that could ban open carry of firearms in the city. [More]
In other words, it won’t change a thing.
Ain’t it just like Tishuara?
And did everyone catch Obama’s old “Chicago to Cheyenne” tactic?
[Via bondmen]
Polls reveal most Americans favor laws limiting the capacity of firearms magazines to 10 rounds, and the New York Times reports that several generally pro-gun federal legislators have expressed support for such legislation. [More]
I read that and my immediate thought was “Who?” and to go kick some Vichycon @$$.
So to prove that he links to a 10-year-old article and the “pro-gun federal legislators” were Harry Reid and other Democrats?
This is “thinking seriously”…?
[Via bondmen]
NRA has done something good, so it won’t hurt us to recognize that. Spreading this video far and wide can help promote RKBA and challenge prohibitionist lies. That includes throwing it in the faces of gun-grabbing Democrats in reply to their idiotic social media posts.
It needs to be followed up with a strong “Now Stop Voting for Democrats!” message, because that needs to change not just anecdotally, but dramatically.
[Via Andy M]
Three months ago the New Mexico governor announced a 30-day ban on citizens’ right to carry a concealed firearm in Albuquerque and the county that Albuquerque sits in. What did the Justice Department do when the governor did that unconstitutional order? What did the DOJ do in response to that unconstitutional action from the governor of New Mexico? [Watch]
The same thing they didn’t do two decades ago when we petitioned the Republicans for rights enforcement.
[Via Jess]
From an email discussion amongst the Ramsey. A. Bear Society, a “small cadre” that includes me in their discourse:
DeWilde v. Attorney General: Supplemental authority filed. Here, he says that he got his Form 1 approved for self-manufacturing an FGM-148 Javelin Anti-Tank Missile Launcher. He is doing so to prove that if he can get approval for the Javelin launcher, which is a more destructive portable arm (firearm, to be exact) than semi and full autos, then he should get approval for full autos.
Ahh. That is awesome. The gov argument is that he has no “right” to possess it under the 2A, not that he cannot legally possess it. So if the gov decides to ban it, there is no issue. That is what the gov argues.
We’re gonna need a bigger range…
This week, I will put the Assault Weapons Ban on the Senate floor. [More]
What, is this Democrats whoring for headlines week…?
Question: Say the GOP blows ’24 or the election is stolen again, SCOTUS gets stacked, and this power pervert’s nocturnal emission comes true. Then say just 3% of us, and pray that’s all it is, reply “No, your move”…
Flesh out your plan, Schumer, you loathsome traitor. What needs to happen then, in detail, what will resistance to your bullshit tyranny look like, and you’re sure your enforcers are up for the response your hatred of men who believe unbendingly in the right to keep and bear arms will set off?
[Via Jess]
Sen. Gillibrand said Monday that new federal gun legislation has allowed authorities to prosecute hundreds of gun traffickers. [More]
Is it out of line to ask what “allows” the legislation?
Here’s the tax-funded propaganda the “real reporter” parroted from. And here’s the “report,” which on first glance appears to unintentionally confirm John Lott’s conclusions that concentrated Democrat crime areas do not justify blanket citizen disarmament.
And is Kirsten ever going to show us the answers she gave NRA when she was lying to them for an endorsement?
[Via Jess]
The 2nd Amendment is My Gun Permit [More]
It is not, dammit. Stop saying that it is.
That plays right into the hands of the globalists and the tactical genius NRA prags who defend them.
Waiver of right of respondent Jay Robert Pritzker, et al. to respond filed. [More]
There’s some arrogance for ya. They figure they don’t have to answer for Illinois Supreme Court corruption. Let’s hope SCOTUS surprises them and decides to look into it.
I’m told there may be more action on this later in the week, and if so, will decide if I can address it here or if a longer article is needed.
[Via President Non_Fudd]
